My God, just because you've researched this does not mean that it's been proven for fact, that it would be 100% impossible for this to not be true.
Most science is theory, you pseudo-intellectual.
Looking at Wikipedia, the word "theory" is used constantly, including the "theory of gravitation". In an episode of MythBusters, they're discussing gravitation and eventually they say that "well, I suppose gravity IS a theory".
You may think you're absolutely right, but I want you to provide me with something besides its popular usage to show that it is a fact.
And Sora doesn't rely on gimmicks? Yeah, I guess even though the entire game is built on its relation with Disney characters means nothing. Take away Disney and Sora has FF moves.
The fact remains that the licensing issues don't validate appealing to a fanbase that exists primarily on Sony consoles. You either can never even hint at anything that originated from Disney material, or buy the rights to those and break his rule of "vg originating characters only". Slime has none of those problems - in fact, he has all of the advantages that Sora lacks. His fanbase is primarily located with Nintendo, no licensing issues at all, a more well-known face - and you know what? Sonic has never been more iconic in Japan than Slime.
By the way, checked out the "Newton's law of universal gravitation" article on Wikipedia.
Isaac Newton's theory of universal gravitation is a physical law describing the gravitational attraction between bodies with mass. It is a part of classical mechanics and was first formulated in Newton's work Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published in 1687. In modern language it states the following:
See that magic word, "theory"?
I don't pretend to know much about science. But if there's one thing I know, which you seem to not know, it's that most sciences are based mostly on theory, and that includes this one.
For a physics geek, you don't seem to gravitate to logic.
Really? Because to me it read like a slightly more well worded "no, UR gay" response.
Though, in general, I agree with your point. "Gay" is about the least offensive "insult" you can call someone.
The whole point is that I said it to insult him, not gays.
However, his insult was simply derogatory, and in an attempt to insult me, it implies that being gay is bad to be.