Real talk, why is it Skull Kid people want when it comes to another Zelda villian?
Like, almost every argument that can be used for him can be used for every other Zelda villian. A lot of Zelda villians were one shots that left a good impression on people due to their mannerisms. Is it solely MM alone that gives him the upper edge?
I mean, I may be confused as I'm like the only guy in the thread who would rather have Vaati instead.
Or WW Ganondorf.
He has a rad design and is from the
objectively best game in the Zelda series
Also he can be seen as repping MM, which is otherwise somewhat poorly represented in Young Link (no Fierce Deity Final Smash, weapons from the beginning of OoT)
Dunno bout other people, but I think he could also have a really unique playstyle based around cursing the opponent (nothing broken like swapping their controls or anything)
As for other Zelda villains, Ganon would be cool but I'd rather we got a Zelda newcomer that's not one of the triforce wielders for once. Vaati's decent but hasn't been a presence for years as the Capcom Zelda games get sadly ignored. Bellum and Malladus are boring, Demise is Ganon but worse, Ghirahim would be cool but I'd rather a non swordie ideally, Veran and Onox are largely forgotten, and the nightmares from Link's Awakening ... but I don't think anyone's ever demanded them