Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It appears that you are using ad block :'(
Hey, we get it. However this website is run by and for the community... and it needs ads in order to keep running.
Please disable your adblock on Smashboards, or go premium to hide all advertisements and this notice. Alternatively, this ad may have just failed to load. Woops!
I do think it's rather early to have a third game....and I was kind of worried that 2 wouldn't turn out so well because of how quickly it was released, but I thought it was fine in the end.
Still, I do hope that a bit more time is spent on the next one, as long as Scott thinks he can do more to improve it (without making it too huge either) It being announced this early is fine by me regardless though.
Also not sure about the rest of ya but I personally like a lot of the fan songs and voices and all, as long as they fit the storyline of the game and the characters, respectively.
The overall fanbase does have....a lot of bad moments, though.....
I dunno if I agree with that. To me iof it was literally just animatronics coming up and scaring you/even killing you if you wanted to let that much of the story seep in, i'd be far less interested. I'm not a horror game fan, the reason I like FNaF is because it has potential roots in other things and because of that makes the animatronics coming to get you feel so much worse.
Kingofphantoms is right though, the FNaF fanbase can be... well yeah.
Perhaps. I must say, I can't go beyond the lore and play it myself, i'd freak myself out.
I think it's fine to enjoy the game for its story, I know I certainly do (and KoP does too). If it gets out of hand with a bad fanbase, I don't think that's necessarily a good reason to turn on the game. All it was trying to do was be an interesting game. =P
Ugh, why do they feel the need to dumb down the Pokemon difficulty? Pokemon games weren't really hard to begin with. I don't feel I'm missing much out with ORAS to be honest.
Why dose Masuda say they want to make the main game easy and the post game hard, and then immediately after that he says they took out the battle frontier because it made the post game hard?
Actually, it's implied in Kid Icarus: Uprising that
Hades being evil isn't necessarily due to him being the Underworld god, but because he's abusing his powers as a god. There's an implication that the existence of the Underworld is necessary to maintain a balance.
There isn't the Hades = Underworld = Evil thing in play, actually.
You should play that game if you haven't, by the way.
Why name him Hades then? I mean, he still seeks destruction, right? Something the Greek Hades would never do (among other things), which is why I still think it's portraying misconceptions... Okay, I mean, it's possible that Hades might want to, idk, do some bad things, like kill people or destroy whatever. But, like I said before, there are far better Greek gods that fit the bill, so why make Hades abuse his powers and become the villain (yet again)? Zeus would make a more interesting villain imo.
Yeah, the Underworld is never an evil thing.
What I'm trying to get at, is that I guess I wished they portrayed some characters more closer to their Greek counterparts. However, it's kinda like Disney and their interpretations of some classic tales. I'm just overly picky when it comes to Hades (as he's one of my fave Greek gods) and how he's portrayed in some media (there's some that I think do a decent job at presenting him though).
I always thought it would be cool if Pit had to go to Hades and ask to borrow Cerberus or some weapon to help complete a part of the game. Of course, Pit would need to defeat the dog or Hades to receive whatever in order to prove he's worthy. Or maybe help Hades recover after he got the **** beaten out of him randomly by Hercules and his arrows (or depending on the interpretation used, choose to side with either Hades or Hercules before the battle). Something more akin to the myths I guess (perhaps make him more neutral idk).
I've played the original KI and Of Myths and Monsters, but Uprising doesn't interest me that much (which is why I only read/watched playthroughs).
Why dose Masua say they want to make the main game easy and the post game hard, and then immediately after that he says they took out the battle frontier because it made the post game hard?
Why name him Hades then? I mean, he still seeks destruction, right? Something the Greek Hades would never do (among other things), which is why I still think it's portraying misconceptions... Okay, I mean, it's possible that Hades might want to, idk, do some bad things, like kill people or destroy whatever. But, like I said before, there are far better Greek gods that fit the bill, so why make Hades abuse his powers and become the villain (yet again)? Zeus would make a more interesting villain imo.
Yeah, the Underworld is never an evil thing.
What I'm trying to get at, is that I guess I wished they portrayed some characters more closer to their Greek counterparts. However, it's kinda like Disney and their interpretations of some classic tales. I'm just overly picky when it comes to Hades (as he's one of my fave Greek gods) and how he's portrayed in some media (there's some that I think do a decent job at presenting him though).
I always thought it would be cool if Pit had to go to Hades and ask to borrow Cerberus or some weapon to help complete a part of the game. Of course, Pit would need to defeat the dog or Hades to receive whatever in order to prove he's worthy. Or maybe help Hades recover after he got the **** beaten out of him randomly by Hercules and his arrows (or depending on the interpretation used, choose to side with either Hades or Hercules before the battle). Something more akin to the myths I guess.
I've played the original KI and Of Myths and Monsters, but Uprising doesn't interest me that much (which is why I only read/watched playthroughs).
I'd rather want it on Wii U with beautiful HD visuals. It's perfect for this type of game honestly! (And you never needed an actual camera to play the game, so his logic made even less sense)
..But honestly, I just want Pokemon Snap 2 at all at this point. 1 was soooooo freaking fun and addicting. I love the whole challenge score thing too
I'd rather want it on Wii U with beautiful HD visuals. It's perfect for this type of game honestly! (And you never needed an actual camera to play the game, so his logic made even less sense)
..But honestly, I just want Pokemon Snap 2 at all at this point. 1 was soooooo freaking fun and addicting. I love the whole challenge score thing too