BREAKDOWN WITH RONALD JAMES LEVINSON (YES. I USED MY NAME. NOW DD CAN CALL ME RONALD J. LEVINSON IF HE WANTED WHEN HE'S ANGRY):
1. So if it's behind Dragon Quest and Final Fantasy, who are overall more important to VIDEO GAMES than Tales, then why wouldn't we get them?
They're not requested.
2. Yeah... they have more. So... what does that have to do with Nintendo? Regardless of who is on whose console, Fire Emblem is a Nintendo franchise.
Therefore, it has more priority than Tales. By the way, if we have seen Fire Emblem in 3 out of the 4 games, then why hasn't Lloyd made an appearance? I mean, clearly he is much more of an important character than *gasp* Marth and Ike.
I mean that it has a lot of video games because its a big-time series.
3. Entirely subjective. Anyone can have a great moveset and potential for one. If they can make a toy Robot a valid player, then I think anyone can be done.
But some are like better than others. tell me which sounds better - Takamaru's potential moveset or Starfy? Tell me.
4. Sales doesn't really matter that much. If it mattered, then we wouldn't have Earthbound, would we? No, I don't think so.
Earthbound's a special case because of Sakurai's raging hard-on for the series. I don't know why and I don't think we ever will.
5. Yeah, because spinoffs that have no or little value to Nintendo are really important, even moreso than the consistent popular Fire Emblem.