Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Then he can see possible uniqueness with a character from Brain Age and Nintendog, and they are series lots of people are aware of.
I take uniqueness also as a reason (In which Nintendog and Dr. Kawashima actually have) with the addition both series as important to Nintendo, they already differentiate from other characters. There's my reasons.
Although I agree with you on ROB and indeed your general point, Snake, being the first 3rd Party character, was anything but an obvious pick for pre-Brawl trailer speculation.
Fox is a FOX, Falco is a BIRD, Mario is a HUMAN, Dedede is a PENGUIN, Toad is a TOAD, Yoshi is a YOSHI. <- totes best example.
They're not REAL dogs, birds, and penguins!
Wait WHAT? Kawashima is not owned by Nintendo?
He's also a real person.
Vaati! The most underrated smash contender.
If Nintendog, Chrom's voice actor, and false Pichu leak is fun, then yes.
I can understand the general shock made by a character like WFT at first, but the fact is that it doea make sense in the end. Like Snake, where his history with Nintendo was strong enough to include him, even if he was 3rd party which we havent seen before at that point.
They are all anthropomorphic and/or cartoony, though (also, Toad is a MUSHROOM)
Yoshi is a Yoshi. At what point do we draw the line? Yoshi is a real imitation of dinosaurs, right? No, of course not. There is some merit to the argument that the characters are not express imitations of real life counterparts, however, cannot a representative of the Nintendog franchise be devised that is DOGE THE DOGE or something that's like a Yoshi or Toad or anything just as unique? Smash, then, would not be representing an imitation, but be representing a representative of the franchise. To that effect it is about perspective, but I ultimately have to agree with you, I don't think that Sakurai will take that perspective and include Nintendog as a character, however, it is certainly well within the realm of plausibility.
It's possible that Sakurai can ask Kawashima to use his likeness. I don't think you should immediately round to negative 100.
He could ignore the fans again, just like WFT. :9
I'd love to see him, as Minish Cap is the best Zelda ever NO EXCEPTION, but even I know his chances are nigh abysmal.
Then he can see possible uniqueness with a character from Brain Age and Nintendog, and they are series lots of people are aware of.
I take uniqueness also as a reason (In which Nintendog and Dr. Kawashima actually have) with the addition both series as important to Nintendo, they already differentiate from other characters. There's my reasons.
Lots of people are aware of Tetris, let's add a Tetris character!
In what way? Come at me, bro! Oh, popularity. I suppose I have to give that one up.
I thought the Pichu leak was rather entertaining, actually. Gave me a good laugh.
I thought I did a pretty good job defusing it with a concession. We all bros here :3
He doesn't need to stand on the ground,
Corn and Rye tag team for Smash.
Actually Anna is Banana.
M Bison sez yes.
WILL YOU STOP IT ALREADY!?
If you want him to stop, don't give him something to reply to.
Hey.
Nintendo actually has a great relationship with Kawashima, Iwata and him are great friends, those two lead to the creation of Brain Age. I think he's willing to accept ideas from Nintendo.
Yeah, I don't' believe you.
Saying something possible is one of the worst defenses to claim something is likely going to happen. Anything is possible. And you STILL didn't answer my last question.
Come at me, bro, haha
You might as well have to copy-and-paste this post elsewhere, as I fear the tireless discussion of "4th party characters" and intellectual properties will arise again.
