#HBC | Laundry
Grand Sage of Swag
Whatever man I don't care what you say I gotta have my frosted flakes and my visions of R'hllor you can't hold me down man
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's so pleasant to be playing a game in DGames again instead of other sites.
Vote: #HBC | Laundry
What are you doing?oh god the cancer
Vote: Maven89, goodbye cruel world
I'll consider it if you tell me about some new faces I don't know much about. Rosa/Spak/Maven are the only ones I don't know.
Shall we be friends J?
Calm yer arse down it aint that badCommenting on the state of the thread
What competition there's no competition unless it's a frosted flakes eating competition then you're on son It's on like donkey kongHave to eliminate the competition ASAP.
. . .What competition there's no competition unless it's a frosted flakes eating competition then you're on son It's on like donkey kong
????
:???:
I didn't get any PM
Bruh, it ain't Smash, so you can't do it at Apex. You need to hold it at EVO.. . .
I'll have to take you up on that sometime.
APEX 2016 mm?
I'm in.. . .
I'll have to take you up on that sometime.
APEX 2016 mm?
It was joking rationale for a random vote.That was @ Spak btw
Terrible rationaleIt was joking rationale for a random vote.
Not terrible rationelle, joking rationelle. I see that attempted humor isn't welcomed in a game, so my apologies (and I apologize for inevitably using it further throughout the game). I picked Maven because he's the only one I've played with before and I wanted to see him post some more to tell how different his content isis.Terrible rationale
That was laundry not meNot terrible rationelle, joking rationelle. I see that attempted humor isn't welcomed in a game, so my apologies (and I apologize for inevitably using it further throughout the game). I picked Maven because he's the only one I've played with before and I wanted to see him post some more to tell how different his content isis.
As for it being rationelle for him being scum, it's as much of a rationelle as you voting for Rake because he has the word "Jabroni" in his name.
This is not the same as:Not terrible rationelle, joking rationelle. I see that attempted humor isn't welcomed in a game, so my apologies (and I apologize for inevitably using it further throughout the game).
this.I picked Maven because he's the only one I've played with before and I wanted to see him post some more to tell how different his content isis.
That's all you had to say in response?That was laundry not me
Its the simplest explanation to his result. Aint no reason for me to answer more in depth if that covers itThat's all you had to say in response?
Oh, OK. In that case, @ BarDulL I think you're missing Laundry's vote on Rake. I remembered that happening, but only saw Wots voting for Rake, so I assumed it was him.That was laundry not me
It was supposed to be. I was attempting to pass it off as a random vote so that he wouldn't be so carefully looking over anything he types for scummable material and I could get an early read off. It was less likely for me to get a reply from Maven since randvotes are pretty nonconsequencial, but I figured it would be less susceptible to having scumminess filtered out. Unfortunately, that plan is busted now because any scumminess that wouldn't have been filtered is now going to be filtered.The former is a random vote which is basically just thrown around as a joke. The latter is targeting a player you know to get a reaction. One of these statements sounds like bull**** as a result.
No, it was a response to him pointing out the rake vote was me, not at all to anything else he said. That doesn't respond to anything else he said.Its the simplest explanation to his result. Aint no reason for me to answer more in depth if that covers it
Because imo it was more focused on a vote that wasn't mine. I can't explain mtself if hes quesyioning your voteNo, it was a response to him pointing out the rake vote was me, not at all to anything else he said. That doesn't respond to anything else he said.