Quakfest 11: Milk Was A Bad Choice *~ 9-20-08~* BART PLANS CHANGED!!!!

[Rosedemon]

Why does everyone spell Casey's gamer tag wrong.

Its The___Cheese.

Nubs.

 

[Miharu]

So if you're going to classify someone, what would you classify someone who has no preference in a guy or a girl?

What am I, some guy who likes girls, and guys on the side? Or someone who doesnt clearly know what i like.

Dont take me there, cuz I know what the hell im attracted to.

fa

ggot

no homo

 

[Rosedemon]

I like it when you talk dirty to my HK.

^In a non-gay way.

 

[NeighborhoodP]

fa

ggot

no homo

best post evar

 

[Havokbringer]

Alan you should be mad at smashboards also cus it went overboard with the underscores.

 

[Shroomed]

hey ppl look at this http://www.flickr.com/photos/26645199@N06/2834703809/

too funny

made by HFCS (another peach player)

 

[HyugaRicdeau]

P obviously doesn't know Zoap.

Sexuality is a continuous scale from 100% straight to 100% gay. Few people are really 100% of either in my experience.

 

[Rosedemon]

P obviously doesn't know Zoap.

Sexuality is a continuous scale from 100% straight to 100% gay. Few people are really 100% of either in my experience.

This man speaks the truth.

Half one of my high schools football teams claimed to be straight, but then fessed up to being Bi curious.

Half of my other highschools football team was blowing each other.

Awkward highshcool life, I had.

 

[NeighborhoodP]

lol @ implying most straight people are 90% straight or some other such nonsense

 

[Miztik]

Hey Zoap get your d i c k outta your a s s and stop being so sensitive you f u c k i n p u s s y.

uncensored ftw...

whoa

this is intense Zoap is too good whats your prob???

also Noob at uncensored post lmao (spacing between each letter)

too fucking good

 

[ProdigyKid]

i think we should all play mario kart ds competitively

Fixed your post.

 

[The___cheese]

Everyone shut up, this thread is now about Quakfest and how stupid the names are.

 

[HyugaRicdeau]

lol @ implying most straight people are 90% straight or some other such nonsense

A percentage scale doesn't really make sense here, I just used 100% to mean "absolutely" or "exclusively" and to emphasize the fact that orientation is not binary but a continuum. Not to mention that "gay" and "straight" are notoriously ill-defined terms.

The Kinsey report found that "Kinsey estimated that nearly 46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or "reacted to" persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives." Kinsey concluded that all but a small percentage of the population were to one degree or another bisexual (falling on the scale from 1 to 5) at some point during their lives.
http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html#bisexuality

 

[NeighborhoodP]

Except that doesn't necessarily mean anything at all; you can "engage" in both activities and still be 100% straight (or gay). Come on now. Wtf is "reacted to"?

All in all, that study says nothing.

 

[pockyD]

the problem is you have a preconceived notion of what "100% straight" means in your head that isn't shared by the people you're arguing with

 

[HomeMadeWaffles]

PHIL IS GONNA WIN THIS AND IM GONNA MAKE SURE HE DOES.

IM TIRED OF HIM NOT GETTING 1ST. HE FING DESERVES IT. SO WATCH OUT PEOPLE HE IS GONNA GET FIRST AT THIS QUAKFEST

justin speaks the truth.

phil is probably one the most nicest/positive people i know

to see him win would be really nice.

 

[The___cheese]

He will have to defeat us all.

 

[Miharu]

justin speaks the truth.

phil is probably one the most nicest/positive people i know

to see him win would be really nice.

that means i'd have to play him in tournament (which happens every tournament anyways)

i don't like men

no homo

 

[debaser]

Wtf is "reacted to"?

broner

no homo

 

[PHIL07]

LOL ill try

 

[HyugaRicdeau]

I take it that the "reacted to" phrase is just a parenthetical expression, i.e. Kinsey intends "'reacted to' persons of both sexes" and "had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities" to mean equivalent things.

I said I was talking about "gay" and "straight" in terms of sexuality, not something like say, forming long-term romantic relationships, which is probably more polarized, so I'd say that you can't engage in both activities willingly and be 100% of one, by definition. If you like, replace "gay" with "homosexual" and "straight" with "heterosexual," then gay and straight refer to romantic relationships instead. Though they certainly aren't disjoint from one another.

 

[Naota21t]

And Sheriden w/ the ****.

no homo.

 

[NeighborhoodP]

And Sheriden w/ the ****.

no homo.

You're an idiot.

I take it that the "reacted to" phrase is just a parenthetical expression, i.e. Kinsey intends "'reacted to' persons of both sexes" and "had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities" to mean equivalent things.

I said I was talking about "gay" and "straight" in terms of sexuality, not something like say, forming long-term romantic relationships, which is probably more polarized, so I'd say that you can't engage in both activities willingly and be 100% of one, by definition. If you like, replace "gay" with "homosexual" and "straight" with "heterosexual," then gay and straight refer to romantic relationships instead. Though they certainly aren't disjoint from one another.

My point is that as written it's extremely misleading because he's not even specifying the definitions of what a heterosexual / homosexual activity is (I'd hope he did at some point in the study, but it's not like I care enough about this whole thing to bother looking). Don't you see how easily that a statement like "Kinsey concluded that all but a small percentage of the population were to one degree or another bisexual (falling on the scale from 1 to 5) at some point during their lives." could be so semantical as to be effectively and, in practical terms, worthless?

 

[quak]

fyi, i don't endorse any of the san pabloians posts

nor anyone bored enough to take them seriously

yes, anyone will to help out with a car should be here at nine

big head, i volunteer you

[/win]

 

[HyugaRicdeau]

According to the website, what constitutes "heterosexual and homosexual activities" is ultimately a self-evaluation based on the experience of the subjects of the test. So the result is really "nearly 46% of the male population considers themselves to have engaged in both homosexual and heterosexual activity." Certaintly there will be variation in what people consider to be such activities, but it's not an empty statement. A less subjective conclusion (from the same study) reported that 37% of males had at least one same-sex experience to orgasm, presumably by the same standard of definition of a "same-sex experience."

If I had to come up with my own definition, I would say that someone is SOME "percent" bisexual (i.e. not completely 100% straight/heterosexual or gay/homosexual) if they could imagine a possible scenario where they derived any sexual or romantic enjoyment whatsoever from the act (whatever it is, it doesn't even have to be sexual necessarily) itself by virtue of it being with the same/opposite sex. And again, speaking from personal experience only (I never claimed anything beyond that in the first place), few people I have met actually are "100%'s" to the extent that I have been able to evaluate them.

 

[ProdigyKid]

All in all, that study says nothing.

Neither do you.

 

[Vodage]

According to the website, what constitutes "heterosexual and homosexual activities" is ultimately a self-evaluation based on the experience of the subjects of the test. So the result is really "nearly 46% of the male population considers themselves to have engaged in both homosexual and heterosexual activity." Certaintly there will be variation in what people consider to be such activities, but it's not an empty statement. A less subjective conclusion (from the same study) reported that 37% of males had at least one same-sex experience to orgasm, presumably by the same standard of definition of a "same-sex experience."

If I had to come up with my own definition, I would say that someone is SOME "percent" bisexual (i.e. not completely 100% straight/heterosexual or gay/homosexual) if they could imagine a possible scenario where they derived any sexual or romantic enjoyment whatsoever from the act (whatever it is, it doesn't even have to be sexual necessarily) itself by virtue of it being with the same/opposite sex. And again, speaking from personal experience only (I never claimed anything beyond that in the first place), few people I have met actually are "100%'s" to the extent that I have been able to evaluate them.

To the extent that I have been able to evaluate this conversation, it is 100% gay.

(Edit: Hey Denny! Put me down for cube and BART ride plz kthx)

 

[Miharu]

fa

ggots

you are homo

 

[NeighborhoodP]

If I had to come up with my own definition, I would say that someone is SOME "percent" bisexual (i.e. not completely 100% straight/heterosexual or gay/homosexual) if they could imagine a possible scenario where they derived any sexual or romantic enjoyment whatsoever from the act (whatever it is, it doesn't even have to be sexual necessarily) itself by virtue of it being with the same/opposite sex.

I'm pretty sure if almost any guy has some dude sucking his **** like Sasha Grey, his biological response is to get an erection, and if adequately sustained, to bust a nut

I'm sure there will be some exceptions that will mentally just be unable to be aroused, but to your **** a wet hole is a wet hole.

I can look at some dude and be like, "Well, I can see why girls would be really attracted to him," or "It's not hard to get b1tches looking like that," but I wouldn't say that makes me 99 or 75 or anything less than 100% homosexuality (or even if it "does," it's a numerical value with no significance attached to it); it's just being secure in your manhood, in your sexuality.

 

[HyugaRicdeau]

I'm pretty sure if almost any guy has some dude sucking his **** like Sasha Grey, his biological response is to get an erection, and if adequately sustained, to bust a nut

Of course, but that's why I include the "by virtue of it being with whatever sex" caveat.

I can look at some dude and be like, "Well, I can see why girls would be really attracted to him," or "It's not hard to get b1tches looking like that," but I wouldn't say that makes me 99 or 75 or anything less than 100% homosexuality (or even if it "does," it's a numerical value with no significance attached to it); it's just being secure in your manhood, in your sexuality.

I agree, and that reaction wouldn't fit under my definition anyway.

 

[NeighborhoodP]

fa

ggots

you are homo

***got might be my favorite world in the english language

 

[Zoap]

all i said was get your **** outta here, no need to tell me to take my **** and **** myself.

P how is ***got your favorite world?

Hey sheridan would you like to team?

Dont worry about it Falcomist, Shroomed knew I was just ****ing around, if havok takes it that seriously beating him in tournament might cause some huge problems.

 

[The___cheese]

*Redirects everyone (Including the goblins in the caves) to Quak's last post.*

 

[Shroomed]

if I wake up in time denny, then I'll b there at 9

 

[Rosedemon]

What is this?

Ky vs Zoap @ quakfest? Thats bout to be some good ****.

Dont forget the popcorn.

 

[Miztik]

shroomed wake up early for doc haha

 

[Zoap]

Marth vs Peach is hardly ever a good match, assuming the marth knows what he is doing.

 

[Miztik]

yea i think its funny when a marth think they pretty much have it won if they ban dreamland lol

 

[Rosedemon]

Oh trust me, I know my marth vs peach stuff. And its downright gay.

Also know Ky has like, 10 years of Alan practice.

Just saying, Zoap vs Ky would be something to watch.

 

[lordXblade]

****it, that's my move in date.