Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Looking into you right now and others who pressed for a vanilla game. You were the main one who stuck out to me, might be something we do not see eye to eye on. I value day play as well I just recognize town loses 70% of the time in vanilla game and you seem perfectly ok with those odds right now or rather seem to not see it as an issue. Could you clarify why this is the case? I don't care what game we came from, I know this from almost a decade of mafia, PRs balance the game out because it is inherently scum sided by a large margin. I want you to address this.I don't see why you try to bring up statistics to me when I tell you that I prefer vanilla simply because I'd prefer people looking more at their actions during the day, since that's the information we can see with our own eyes, instead of guessing (possibly with wifom thrown in) with night actions and looking at night kills. I think this should be good reasoning enough. I mean we just came from a Maven game that had Vult*scum cleared by Nabe. That wouldn't happen in a Vanilla game.
Now what are your reads Ryu? How are you reading me?
Previous game we were in.I just stated (a clarification, mind you) why bro. I definitely think it's something we don't see eye to eye on and I can understand and respect that. I feel like you just are ignoring my reasoning here and you talk past it with 'I value it as well but..." The statistics don't matter to me because what matters to me is my personal experiences with the games I've played. (Most of that I've won) You have to see that I was purely trying to pick out the best role for town and weigh the options, and I even came to the conclusion that Detective was a good fit. Now, to make things clear. When I say I prefer Vanilla game, I mean I prefer a simpler game, and I don't mind a few PR's to balance scum. I do mind an entire PR game unless it's an OS game. (Time Travellers anyone?)
I want to ask, what do you mean 'I don't care what game we came from?', what relevance does that have with what you are bringing up?
I'm saying that you being null is the only one of Zen's reads I agree with.....
You spent the whole of pregame disagreeing with me and im the thing you dont disagree with now?
What are your reads on Ryker, Ryu, and Maven?
I have Ryker as town via his D0 play. Most of the credit I give him comes from him calling out Laundry's Poisoner bull**** for now.Where are you in terms of reads? I have no bead on you.
Im going to the field tomorrow morning so I'll be v/la till wednesday
Who do you scumread beyond Maven? Give me a second and third read.I agree with Soup's #223 and #228.
I don't see it as any different than anyone else who was arguing on roles. I would agree if he were more present in D0 and actually discussing why the role he'd want would be best. Yet, he wasn't, and I think it's because he did not care to progress the game state. (In the last PYP) He pushes me and soup (not sure who else preferred decoy) simply for wanting Decoy, which shows he's not looking at the whole play, but just one facet of our play. His reasoning to push is indeed, weak as you say.
I'm starting to better about Soup. He's making sense to me.
Because you didn't direct it at me until far after the fact, nor did you attempt to redirect my attention until after I had reaffirmed my distaste for you. The entire phrasing of your post was not "hey Laundry, answer this", it was "this is questionable about Laundry" followed by an open request for the game to talk about it. If you wanted me to talk about it, why not simply say "hey Laundry, talk to me about your Ryker read"? The way you went about it comes across far more likely as baiting and that makes your entire approach questionable from my point of view. I can think of a lot of people that want to bait me given my history as a more emotional and reactionary player on this site.Okay, but you didn't answer what I asked about Ryker and instead just deflected the pressure onto me. I don't understand how this is a hard concept for you.
I didn't expect people to scumhunt but the ones that did fill out the townier half of my readslist for a reason. When people are scumhunting or building the foundation of their scumhunting on a day when it's not the prerogative, they're probably town. That'd be the instinctual townie thing to do: read people, hunt scum, make decisions as well. The people that were visibly doing it (Ryker, Ran, Ruy, myself, somewhat Orbo) come off as townie as a result. The people that didn't, ergo, are not necessarily mafia (see: my Zen read) but are people worth investigating at the start of the day.You're not someone to miss details usually, I really don't understand your angle. You say I wasn't talking about anything but mechanics but I only contributed at the angle of which was being talked about, which was pretty much mechanics. There was nothing else that couldn't just wait until D1, but for some reason you're being arrogant or impatient or maybe both. It's not a good look for you to instantly assume you know my prerogative and then tell me that I wasn't doing anything.
Can you answer me about your read on Ryker from D0 yet?
Spoilers: I changed my mind.Not saying you can't change your mind but...where did the original point go and what did you expect to do with it?
Here's where--in the original analysis of the tailor wagon in an attempt to find mafia on it.I'm throwing out Maven's support of it as I think it comes off far more likely as a crackpot theorist trying too hard to remain a step ahead of his enemies than a manipulating scum.
My understanding of your reads from this post:If I were like Laundry, Ran/Ryu would both be town but I don't think it's that simple. Ran is a gut feeling of town over Ryu because he's more plain about his approach while Ryu isn't as dense as people make him out to be. There's nothing from Ran that bothers me but also just not enough to really solidify him as town. I didn't like D0 at all and I was looking to get past by it and hopefully push people to just move on, which is why I really had no issue just dropping poisoner talk.
Zen I have somewhat mutual trust in, a lot more than Laundry at least. He's made good points and being straight-faced the whole time, but I strongly disagree with his read on laundry if it's not clear by now.
It's strange where I'm at right now because I liked Laundry because of his stance on Maven and now he's gone and flipped and did nothing with it. I don't know how to really read that if I think laundry as scum but I doubt any scum member would be that transparent about their partner and try to force a town-read unto them, so if Laundry is scum then I don't maven is, even I don't like both.
Everyone else I'm okay with or I don't have enough of a strong opinion to want to speak about it.
Because I came off the Poisoner altogether. My point of view on the Poisoner was that while I assumed we had the Bus Driver, it wasn't confirmed we did and scum may not share my view on the Bus Driver. They could've given us one of the investigatives and, ergo, the Poisoner was effectively worthless. It gave us a risk that I was willing to take with the potential for a good reward. Nobody shared that point of view, so I backed off and defaulted to Detective regardless of that plan. The plan itself was completed and my point of view was better shaped but, despite the fact that one of the three roles it beats (and likely two), nobody wanted it. I wasn't going to get it. I defaulted to Detective as a result.#HBC | Laundry you said you'd prefer poisoner if there's no AG claim, yet after everyone claimed you never brought it up, but still mentioned your plan as being completed. Why? We have several days left for the deadline
That feels a little inaccurate. I can concede the reasoning is weak; I can't concede the reasoning isn't there. I have my reasons for thinking both are town but both are not very strong--that's why I think both are leans rather than hard town like other players.My only real qualm with Laundry is his Orbo read (same for Maven). Neither of them have any reason behind them.
Justify this rather than saying it's bad. I'm one of the few people in this game that is justifying my reads beyond simple generalizations. You're in a bad light now and I want more from you.I think we should lynch Laundry toDay.
Vote Laundry
His push against soup is bad.
UhHis reasoning on why he reads Ryker as town seems very fabricated.
I've seen you go into that self-righteous mode exactly once: when you were scum in Koopa vs Kefka. Despite that, I don't understand it. It is a desperation move but I can't understand what triggered the desperation. It's enough to give me pause, though, hence why I backed off. Why is this hard to understand? Explain it to me, Gheb.He's completely blowing my complaints about the poor decision making of town out of proportion by mislabeling it as an outburst.
Back to this again. You can argue that the Poisoner is anti-town; I backed off on that regardless. I will maintain that throwing out results and just not using them is more anti-town than pushing for the Poisoner ever was. That's not how it works.He also tried to get scum a poisoner in addition to being a key factor in preventing them from getting ST. That's a lot of anti-town in very short amount of time.
I already gave one:Vote Orbo
Zen, Laundry, Gheb, can I get a read on Ran?
Ran's the only other person who even appeared to scumhunt on D0 so he's mostly on here for that reason. He looks like typical Ran. I'm not as convinced of him as I am of Ruy and Drew but the fact that he's one of the few that took initiative in D0 to find scum is enough for now. We'll see how he continues.
Uhhhh, no.#HBC | Ryker
Alright, time for you to do some work bud. Justify Orbo as "poking from the side"--why in particular is it scummy here?
isn't this nitpicking? I asked you about Ryker and for you to explain why/how you came to your read, but also the phrasing. When I say something doesn't make sense and I direct it at you, I can't imaging you could interpret it as anything else but wanting your attention.Laundry said:Because you didn't direct it at me until far after the fact, nor did you attempt to redirect my attention until after I had reaffirmed my distaste for you. The entire phrasing of your post was not "hey Laundry, answer this", it was "this is questionable about Laundry" followed by an open request for the game to talk about it. If you wanted me to talk about it, why not simply say "hey Laundry, talk to me about your Ryker read"? The way you went about it comes across far more likely as baiting and that makes your entire approach questionable from my point of view. I can think of a lot of people that want to bait me given my history as a more emotional and reactionary player on this site.
Since I know you're going to look at that and not reach the point I'm trying to make (given that you just did it in this post), here it is clearly:
-I think you are opting for the safe option in pretty much everything you do--you didn't scumread, your role preference was based on what you believe was the safest option (on which you flipped between 3 different options), and you refused to take a stance on my bp guard plan. There is a distinct lack of stances here from a slot with a history of picking the safe route as scum.
-I think that your weird post about me in D0 was an attempt to bait me.
Not completely true but alright. I don't want to throw caution to the wind about something I'm not fully positive in so I don't like calling someone scum or not scum unless I'm decently confident about it. Right now I'm feeling confident that you're scum but I don't think you're scum with maven, and this is again lack of foresight from you because I said in the post you quoted that I don't think you two are aligned.My understanding of your reads from this post:
Town: Zen
Town-lean: Ran
Null: Everyone else
Scum: Laundry, Maven
While you did what I asked, I'm a bit unimpressed when everyone else in the game has far more fleshed out reads than this.
It's a moot point now. What do you think about Maven as of late? You marked him as null suddenly.Spoilers: I changed my mind.
Here's where--in the original analysis of the tailor wagon in an attempt to find mafia on it.
I wanted to flesh out my read with you further through interaction before I threw down a vote.EBWOP: And if you do think I am scum, where's your vote?
What? That is what baiting someone is meant to do.........What does that even mean? You're right? I was baiting you....
I wasn't attacking you, I wasn't looking to get under your skin.
I explained it a little in my #225, saying that he's made good points and been straight-faced so far. I haven't seen any malicious intent in his posts even if they're not exactly the most in-depth.What? That is what baiting someone is meant to do.........
I think you use that term differently than me. The rest of the situation not withstanding, I would definitely define your comments toward Alex as aggressive. Why exactly do you trust Zen, btw? I don't think I've seen you explain it yet.
I don't see why he makes a point of saying "hey guys let's not start d1 until we've finished up all these discussions". I don't see why he tries to ensure that you have everything on me and I don't see why he asks for more from Maven as mafia. That's about it. Regardless, I didn't ask you why you think he's null, I asked you why you thought he was scum. I want better from you if you're going to slap a vote down on a guy that's not even going to be able to respond to the pressure for 3 days.Uhhhh, no.
I'm not going back through the thread right now, or any time today in all likelihood if we're being real. Also, you're going to facilitate this by playing Overwatch with me until late into the night.
Can you remember anything he's adamant about? I don't. I could be wrong. Feel free to show me. I also don't have a reason in particular that it's scummy aside from general lack of commitment being a safe stance that doesn't push anything forward defaulting to scum favored. My vote's on him because I have no reason to think he's town and no reason to think it's going to change, especially with a V/LA until ****ing Wednesday.
I don't want to chase Gheb right now either. I am not as confident on Ran town as others are at the moment.
No, you asked for the thread to "help you understand". Here:isn't this nitpicking? I asked you about Ryker and for you to explain why/how you came to your read, but also the phrasing. When I say something doesn't make sense and I direct it at you, I can't imaging you could interpret it as anything else but wanting your attention.
This is your exact post since you don't seem to be remembering it clearly. This isn't directed at me. You talk about me and conclude with an open question to the thread. You didn't try to poke me to respond until D1 started nearly two pages later (and I definitely have posts in between this time). If you had wanted to have a discussion of me, this post would have been constructed like this:I understand some people though and why this matters. While I don't like laundry's angle I understand it, it's just everything else. His Ryker read for example is really weird, despite their experience with each other. It reads as cautious and not even really a full opinion, just basically something that results to null saying it's a gutread on town but there's no basis. What? I can't really follow a gutread if you say that's it's not based on anything or not concrete. I'd expect something more solid from anyone if they're going to throw a read out there. I'm further confused by what he meany by this line:
It's confusing to me. If it wasn't important why bring it up? What reasoning? Help me understand.
Notice the difference?#HBC | Laundry
I don't really understand your Ryker read. It seems a bit cautious and I don't understand why you brought it up. Can you flesh it out a bit more? This statement in particular:
Looks off to me. Explain it.