I wouldn't go as far as to say that homosexuality in itself represents femininity.
But you're right in that people shouldn't use the term gay the same as one should say "jank" "inferior" "silly"
I wasn't saying that, I'm saying that it's likely seen as such by those who fling it around in such a crude manner.
I don't think "everyone needs to work or your family starves" is a progressive step, that is the economic system forcing two working parents instead of allowing one parent to stay home and raise children. And in that the mother would probably get the option much more often than the father would based on inclination.
And you really aren't giving the different play styles of boys and girls enough credit. Raising both the same will not yield the same results with all other things being within average parameters. Which as I said has a lot to do with hormones even if that is against the idea that gender doesn't have any biological basis to it.
Society accepts all kinds of things outside the norm, what makes them outside the norm is that not many people choose to do it.
I didn't mention anything about the economy? If one wants to stay at home while the other works, that is entirely their choice to make.
I don't like to sound condescending, but it's fairly obvious that no two individuals ever turn out the same. Even identical twins raised by the same parents would eventually differentiate in some way, so it's not purely a hormonal thing.
And I so wish that last sentence of yours was as true as it should be. On average, people don't like when things deviate from the norm, and more people than I'd care to know are a bit too vocal about stamping out what they don't understand.
(Not this again...)
There are marked mental, physical, and emotional differences between males and females. Also, if 'male' and 'female' don't mean anything, why would our species have two genders? From an evolutionary standpoint, if our genders didn't mean anything, wouldn't we just be asexual?
Gender =/= sex, to start. Reproduction cares not about individuals, only survival, and as the sentient terraformers we 7 billion humans have become it's safe to assume that we don't need to focus on reproduction at this moment.
And the differences between male and female humans really aren't drastic compared to other species. If sexual dimorphism was great enough, this discussion would not take place at all