Saxophoneoftime
Smash Lord
I mean, of course I would say that the murder of infants is wrong (which I do believe; I feel that murder is an abominable wrong), but right there you're assuming that murder is intrinsically wrong; it's only viewed as evil because we're biased on a psychological/social (sometimes I think even a biological) level in believing that it is. I can't really justify it since I'm biased towards letting little babies live, but that's assuming that it's even possible to be truly judged, if that makes sense. I've never really thought much of this stuff though.Interesting choice of words.
Tell me how you intend to justify the murder of infants who come from well off, caring families, while said infant has a high life expectancy.
I have to be extremely descriptive because if I leave out any information, the intent can be twisted.
If I don't say infant and used children instead, one could assume that I mean a child that is old enough to rationalize, and thus is old enough to do wrong. If one can do wrong, then someone can have an intent and reason to murder. Infants, while they can think, do not possess the means to do wrong intentionally, which renders pretty much any "reasonable" reason to murder said infant, moot.
If I don't say well off, some psychopath could justify it as putting them out of their misery.
If I don't say caring, the same ^above^ (might I add ridiculous) logic could be used.
If I don't say high life expectancy, then one could try to justify it as mercy killing but it would be more legitimate.
Merely hypothetical situation, I seriously hope you guys don't do this.
I don't believe that you're 15.
NOT EVEN FOR A SECOND.
Also, doubting someone on the internet of being younger than they are? That's a new one.