Zeox
Smash Champion
but... but... the fake leak... only means one thing... Fake Leak confirmed for Smash 4!!ey don't respond with a distasteful family guy gif, I was just joking and making fun of everyone who keep posting that pic. =P
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
but... but... the fake leak... only means one thing... Fake Leak confirmed for Smash 4!!ey don't respond with a distasteful family guy gif, I was just joking and making fun of everyone who keep posting that pic. =P
I still have no idea where this idea comes from. The game isn't going to be hype enough? They'd have to be withholding these five characters for the duration of the wii u prerelease period, which is at most two months. That means they'd be sitting on five characters that could be in the 3DS version right then, but have arbitrarily decided to withhold for later.You're forgetting the strong possibility that the final five characters will be included as free dlc at the time of the wii u launch, which would make sense as this would build massive amounts of hype. In this case dlc doesn't have to be rated, or is rated separately, meaning Ridley's absence would make sense. And honestly, Mewtwo is the character that makes the most sense to be one of the final five, considering the massive amount of demand from both Japan and everywhere else.
Shulk's reveal trailer is the first one to show a rating. They rest had a disclaimer "May contain content inappropriate for children."The game's been rated for a couple months hasn't it?
Also, why is Ridley objectionable for being a "giant flying monster" while Mewtwo, a more human sized monster with a preference for violence, gets a pass? Your argument needs better presentation I think.
We only saw bits an pieces of the leak. There could've been more footage that we never saw. This is all just speculation, but I definitely agree that DHD should've been shown off because of the game he's from.I doubt the footage and photos we saw was everything shown to the ESRB, though. It's just not enough. It shows very few characters (it seems to focus on unannounced newcomers, I guess because the leaker wanted to show off specific stuff) and presumably none of the 1P modes. And if Ridley should have been shown, shouldn't Duck Hunt have also been shown due to the nature of the original game? They'd probably want to be sure that anything revolving around that character was highlighted, but all we see is a render.
Now you guys are just trolling.Hey guys I'm new to smashboards but I saw this leak here and it blew me away it looked so real!! Can we discuss this please?
Okay, I'll try to be a little more clear. Sorry if this is a little long. A sliding system of roster expansion was used in Brawl. SSB4 seems to use the exact same system. In this system, characters are in a fixed order horizontally based on their position in the final roster. When a character is unlocked, it appears in its set place and all the characters after that new addition shift right to accommodate them. If a character is at the end of a row when a character is added before them, that character moves to the start of the next row.I must REALLY not be understanding you. You say...
The sliding rule was used in Brawl, which means everyone was in the right order, and did not bounce around;
But then explain how everyone bounced around.
You state that this is likely what is evident in the new game.
But we see the (likely) starting CSS and the alleged/near end CSS do not have characters bounce around.
yeah its confirmed is 100% true my friend from Noentiendo confirm thisHey guys I'm new to smashboards but I saw this leak here and it blew me away it looked so real!! Can we discuss this please?
This definitely escalated quickly...Hey guys I'm new to smashboards but I saw this leak here and it blew me away it looked so real!! Can we discuss this please?
So guys, can we talk about this totally new leak I just found out about just now?
I dislike the idea of DLC used other than for extra alternate costumes. It is a fighting game that has a competitive scene, so having characters added in later would change things up competitively.You're forgetting the strong possibility that the final five characters will be included as free dlc at the time of the wii u launch, which would make sense as this would build massive amounts of hype. In this case dlc doesn't have to be rated, or is rated separately, meaning Ridley's absence would make sense. And honestly, Mewtwo is the character that makes the most sense to be one of the final five, considering the massive amount of demand from both Japan and everywhere else.
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure the rating was made public before that trailer.Shulk's reveal trailer is the first one to show a rating. They rest had a disclaimer "May contain content inappropriate for children."
As for Ridley vs. Mewtwo, Ridley is a creature from T-rated games. Mewtwo is a creature from E-rated games. If the leak truly was the ESRB build, which I think is undoubtedly is, they most likely would've shown something of him. Ganondorf was shown, and he is also from a T-rated game (at least that version of him is).
I've been looking at the CSS in a similar way and doesn't Kirby also work for a new rep?The only series which could have additions in the leaked roster without forcing franchises to split across rows are Pokemon, Star Fox, clones, and characters from so-far unrepresented franchises, and there are only a few combinations that will work.
I would just be to keep hype up and keep people focusing on the game with rampant speculation. Basically, they want people looking forward to the wii u version rather than becomiing content with the 3ds version. This, of course, doesn't mean that everyone will, but there's a possibility that some might.I still have no idea where this idea comes from. The game isn't going to be hype enough? They'd have to be withholding these five characters for the duration of the wii u prerelease period, which is at most two months. That means they'd be sitting on five characters that could be in the 3DS version right then, but have arbitrarily decided to withhold for later.
It honestly doesn't matter what you like, it's what makes sense for Nintendo to do as a business. There is also the fact that the wii u version is going to probably be the main competitive version, and the main idea of this theory is that these extra characters would be included on-disc for that version.I dislike the idea of DLC used other than for extra alternate costumes. It is a fighting game that has a competitive scene, so having characters added in later would change things up competitively.
Nice double post.I would just be to keep hype up and keep people focusing on the game with rampant speculation. Basically, they want people looking forward to the wii u version rather than becomiing content with the 3ds version. This, of course, doesn't mean that everyone will, but there's a possibility that some might.
What a stupid reason to not have DLC. Oh, the poor competetive scene of Smash 4, that doesn't even exist yet!I dislike the idea of DLC used other than for extra alternate costumes. It is a fighting game that has a competitive scene, so having characters added in later would change things up competitively.
If only this were a fighting game that the DLC would be releasing for. But even then, fighting games do that all the time.I dislike the idea of DLC used other than for extra alternate costumes. It is a fighting game that has a competitive scene, so having characters added in later would change things up competitively.
Now that you say it that way, I think you're right. I guess I just never thought about it like that.Nice double post.
All they have to do is start showing what's exclusive to the wii to get it selling. Better graphics and online capabilities alone are gonna do that. There's no reason to withhold characters, especially since they're going to be on the 3DS as well. So it's not even an exclusive deal to look forward to since you wouldn't even need the Wii U version to partake in it.
I don't have anything substantial. I'm going off of pure speculation at this point, and the fact that Shulk's trailer is the first one to show the game's rating. However, the ESRB, as stated on their website, rates a game based off of an online questionnaire and a DVD showcasing the game's most extreme content and the game's context.Yeah, but I'm pretty sure the rating was made public before that trailer.
Again, your argument is flawed. The games they come from have would have no bearing on whether they were shown or not. Ridley is a genocidal pirate, Ganondorf is a tyrannical warlock, and Mewtwo is a violent clone whose most well known depiction slaughtered an entire island full of scientists.
Show me something substantial for why Ridley would NEED to be shown specifically but something like Mewtwo wouldn't. Using Ganondorf as your evidence proves nothing unless you can prove that's why Ganondorf was also shown.
EDIT: Just checked. First reference to Smash 3DS' rating was mid July.
It makes no sense for Nintendo to have extra characters on the WiiU version, when they've already said the rosters will be the same on both versions. And if they were to release them for the 3DS version later, what would be the point in holding off on them? To build hype? As has been previously stated, does it not have enough hype?I would just be to keep hype up and keep people focusing on the game with rampant speculation. Basically, they want people looking forward to the wii u version rather than becomiing content with the 3ds version. This, of course, doesn't mean that everyone will, but there's a possibility that some might.
It honestly doesn't matter what you like, it's what makes sense for Nintendo to do as a business. There is also the fact that the wii u version is going to probably be the main competitive version, and the main idea of this theory is that these extra characters would be included on-disc for that version.
1. RudeWhat a stupid reason to not have DLC. Oh, the poor competetive scene of Smash 4, that doesn't even exist yet!
Ridley was in Brawl and I don't think its rating suffered any for it.I don't think Ridley will be in. For one, he was "shown" immediately after Sakurai talked about Yellow Devil, and it even had the caption "Other boss character appearances." The leak from a week ago is definitely real, simply based on 2 things:
1. The render of Shulk in the leak is the exact same pose as the render on the official website.
2. The nametag "ESRB0083" kept popping up in the leak, and we got a rating as of the Shulk trailer: E10+
Because it was the ESRB build, they needed to show the most questionable things in the game that may or may not have affected the rating. If Ridley, a giant flying monster, was in, the ESRB would've seen it. Mewtwo, however, is from a kid-friendly E-rated franchise, and I don't doubt he'll come back, especially if we are getting Dr Mario back. As for Duck Hunt Dog, 2 words: Punching. Bag.
This is insanely likey, imo.Not sure if anybody if anyone is still discussing potential final rosters based on the leak, but here's my expectation:
So what am I basing this on? Well, obviously the leak and that the order changes up when everyone is unlocked, but other than that.
The Trophy Quiz theory.
Not sure if this was still on peoples minds, but the smash direct had a very particular random thing in it. Four breaks that had a little quiz that made you guess a trophy ala "Who's this Pokemon?". It was particularly interesting since it really was a very random thing in the whole direct, everything else in that direct was purely to give info about the game except those breaks. I personally, and I'm sure others with me, believe that nothing that Sakurai does is random and that that seemingly random trophy quiz isn't random at all, but was a very specific tease of Sakurai of what new characters are still coming. So there were four trophies from four particular franchises: Kid Icarus, Fire Emblem, Metroid and Zelda. So far after that direct we've seen two character reveals that are part of these franchises, namely Palutena from KI and Robin from FE. That leaves us with two more franchises that should get a new character, Metroid and Zelda. I know this is of course a theory, but for me it's a 100% confirm on that we'll get a new Zelda and Metroid rep, there is literally no doubt in my mind and no argument is ever gonna convince me otherwise unless it's the real full roster of course.
So, why Ridley and Impa? Well, simply because of all the random leaks surrounding this leak. I was specifically looking for leaks that had at least a Zelda and Metroid character on it, and the few who did mentioned Impa and Ridley together. This is also why Dixie and Mewtwo are on there, because those two got mentioned alongside Impa and Ridley a lot. Machrider seems to be mentioned alongside them as well sometimes, but since that happened inconsistently I left him of the roster for now.
So why Mii's in the bottom-left? Tbh I put them there as a wildcard. We've been shown a separate menu for the Mii's so I don't actually think they would appear on the roster. That said, a lot of options are still left. As a Sal leak supporter I still feel like the the Chorus Kids/Marshel has a real chance of appearing, but since that leak was either fake or very outdated they can be either real, fake or cut so it's just an possibility. Machrider is a possibility as well, but that's only because his name popped up near the leaks I find plausible. Another possibility is that it actually does belong to your Mii. Since your 3ds only holds your personal data, the whole customization menu could be totally separate from all the other menu's and the Mii on the roster would always give you your own Mii that you customized somewhere else. With so many options to fill the slot, I prefer to just assume that fifth missing character doesn't exist and is just a personal Mii slot.
Anyway, this is the final roster I deem most likely. It's not meant to be taken as the truth but as a realistic take on what the final roster imho is gonna look like. Feel free to discuss.
Because imagine how the internet would explode if we got the 3ds version and were convinced that this was the final roster, and then Nintendo blows our minds saying that there are still more characters on the way. That's instant hype and publicity, especially if they revealed one of the hype 3 at the same time.It makes no sense for Nintendo to have extra characters on the WiiU version, when they've already said the rosters will be the same on both versions. And if they were to release them for the 3DS version later, what would be the point in holding off on them? To build hype? As has been previously stated, does it not have enough hype?
Honestly only liked it cause of that Wonderful 101 reference. Hehe great game.Check out his Valiantium Blade!
Exclusive. Exclusive. Exclusives. That's all I hear you do know there isn't a Metal Gear game made every year don't you?What gives Sonic more priority than Snake is that Nintendo has the rights to multiple Sonic exclusives for the coming years. Sega and Nintendo have a very close bond right now in the form of Sonic.
Yeah, that'd be awesome, unless they were already complete characters that were withheld because reasons.Because imagine how the internet would explode if we got the 3ds version and were convinced that this was the final roster, and then Nintendo blows our minds saying that there are still more characters on the way. That's instant hype and publicity, especially if they revealed one of the hype 3 at the same time.
Meh, I prefer characters. Still I don't see how anyone can feel empty. Approx. 50 characters is still awesome.You guys are going to feel very, very, very..empty when the official list comes out.. lol.. But then you can just hype about new techs/combos/tiers ^_^
It's true that would suck if they didn't release fully complete characters, but every other smash game has had characters that the dev team couldn't quite finish in time, and I'm sure this one will be no different. Wouldn't it be better if they kept working on characters they couldn't finish and release them later instead of cutting them like they have in the past?Yeah, that'd be awesome, unless they were already complete characters that were withheld because reasons.
Yeah but even if it did it more than likely wouldn't make it any closer to Nintendo. Ask yourself, when you think of Metal Gear Solid, what console comes to mind? I'm sure that your honest answer would not be a Nintendo console.Exclusive. Exclusive. Exclusives. That's all I hear you do know there isn't a Metal Gear game made every year don't you?
What console do you think of when you hear "Sonic the Hedgehog" or Pacman? Probably not a nintendo console.Yeah but even if it did it more than likely wouldn't make it any closer to Nintendo. Ask yourself, when you think of Metal Gear Solid, what console comes to mind? I'm sure that your honest answer would not be a Nintendo console.
Are you willing to spring ~200$ to play smash a month early? Really only you can answer the question if it's worth it or not.This leak is hyping me up so much that I need to ask a question. If given the opportunity, should I get a Japanese 3DS, and copy of Smash, to hold myself over until the US launch, or ride out the mind numbing, education filled month wait for Smash 4?
The 5 character slots don't have to be dlc. Mario Kart 8 added 5 extra slots to the roster with dlc.You're forgetting the strong possibility that the final five characters will be included as free dlc at the time of the wii u launch, which would make sense as this would build massive amounts of hype. In this case dlc doesn't have to be rated, or is rated separately, meaning Ridley's absence would make sense. And honestly, Mewtwo is the character that makes the most sense to be one of the final five, considering the massive amount of demand from both Japan and everywhere else.
Sonic(if the 3 game exclusivity deal didn't happen): Nintendo, Microsoft, SonyWhat console do you think of when you hear "Sonic the Hedgehog" or Pacman? Probably not a nintendo console.
I'm not saying that they have to be, it's just something that could possibly happen.The 5 character slots don't have to be dlc. Mario Kart 8 added 5 extra slots to the roster with dlc.
Uhh. How about 3rd Party since there all 3rd Parties.Sonic(if the 3 game exclusivity deal didn't happen): Nintendo, Microsoft, Sony
Pac-man-Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft
So yeah I(one person) would think a Nintendo console and other consoles
I meant to say if you asked some one what console they think of when you hear "Sonic the hedgehog", they'll probably say sega genesis. I mean sure, they're not in the console business, but still. I mean, if you ask besides sega,I guess you'd get nintendo or sony.Sonic(if the 3 game exclusivity deal didn't happen): Nintendo, Microsoft, Sony
Pac-man-Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft
So yeah I(one person) would think a Nintendo console and other consoles