Fixed
How does pikachu really out range Kirby? Kirbys ariels all pretty much have more range, I almost swear one time where my Dtilt hit Pikachu while his didnt hit mine Ftilt, I don't even have to mention, Utilt, I think Pikachu hits slightly more infront of him, but thats just me, but Kirby's is faster, same with all of is tilts.
Pikachu's d-tilt and up-tilt outrange everything Kirby has on the ground.
In the air, up-air is disjointed and what can Kirby do about that? his n-air and d-air are awful for that, and Stone is too laggy. All of Kirby's aerials except for n-air and b-air have low ending lag but mediocre startup lag. If Kirby jumps at Pikachu and Pikachu jumps at Kirby, Pikachu's aerials will come out first, and Pikachu will win the exchange.
In addition to winning on the ground and in the air, Pikachu is way faster on the ground, and can get out of bad situations with Quick Attack. How does Kirby have an even matchup here? Pikachu wins in every way possible.
Pikachu is only slightly lighter then Kirby, so he dies almost as easily. Pikachu has lag in his smash attacks which are easy to defend against and are very punishable, which Kirby is good at. You only mentioned Pikachu's Usmash as a killing move...... Even that's expected to come when your at high percents and has limited range that doesn't make its very reliable.
lol, and how does Kirby kill? His own smashes are also incredibly laggy (f-smash is not good at all, no; if you are landing it is only because of For Glory lag or a hard read), you will never hit Pikachu offstage with Kirby because Kirby is too slow to hit through Quick Attack, and up-throw doesn't kill as early in this game as it did in Brawl.
Pikachu has no trouble killing Kirby because of Kirby's bad airspeed. Kirby has to land sometime. If he airdodges or uses an aerial too quickly, that's up-smash bait. What does Kirby do? He's too slow to catch Pikachu while Pikachu is landing; Pikachu can just Quick Attack out of the bad scenario and not get KOed.
Peach spaces really well and almost forces Pikachu to approach when she floats over TJ.
Peach has the moves for close combat as well and a fantastic edge guarding game.
60:40 In peach's favor.
"a fantastic edgeguarding game" -- except that we're talking about Pikachu. Quick Attack is not easy for Peach to edgeguard at all. There are too many angles. We've been over this. Her edgeplay is not an advantage for her in this MU. You should learn to consider both sides of a coin. Earlier in this thread you said that it's bad for Pikachu if he goes out to edgeguard and misses a b-air, but it's even worse for Peach if she goes out to edgeguard and misses, because she's floaty and slow in the air.
What does Peach do in response to SH f-air? She spaces her own, slow, floaty f-airs back? What does Peach do vs. reverse up-tilt? How does Peach catch up to Pikachu? The lack of matchup experience here is glaringly obvious.
"forces Pikachu to approach when she floats over TJ"
You act as though if Pikachu's tjolts don't work, then he has to approach. Why would that be the case? Why can't he just crouch and wait for Peach to approach? Turnips? That's laughable; you can z-catch Turnips with ease.
Pikachu doesn't have to approach Peach. "Not being able to camp with tjolt" doesn't mean that you are suddenly forced to rush in and die.
You don't need huge running speed to actually punish all the time thought. Their running speed(I think) are just plain average which is still decent, but nothing special.
How does Peach punish a whiffed b-air into an up-tilt from midrange? Answer: she doesn't (Turnip is too slow; clashes with up-tilt) You do need good running speed to punish characters with fast aerials who are running around and spacing. Her dash attack makes up for her mediocre ground game because it kills, but even that's not until like 120%?
Your assessments so far have been biased and shallow. You say "What does Pikachu do when someone is below him," but the real question is what does Kirby do when someone is below him? His multiple jumps don't help because his airspeed is bad, and Stone is so slow that it's actually useless. You say Peach's edgeguarding is great when Pikachu's is obviously better. When people correct you, you say "But it's predictable" and leave it at that. What do you think you're trying to accomplish? What is the purpose of your posting here? You're clearly not trying to advance Pikachu's metagame or the metagames of other characters against Pikachu. All you're doing is posting obvious statements like "Peach has good edgeguarding" (we all already know that) and your ratios and asking everyone to convince you that you're wrong. It's also obvious that you don't have any tournament experience with these matchups, and while I won't discredit you on that basis alone, by posting what you're posting you're not being helpful or contributing to the discussion at all.
Instead of that, why not post about what Pikachu can do in his hard matchups in order to win them (for example, Sheik), or what other characters who lose to Pikachu can do to win (like ROB)? Why not be
actually constructive?
I believe in educating others, but there are limits. This will be my last post on the subject.