Cacti
Smash Journeyman
Actually
unvote vote: pierre
unvote vote: pierre
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I don't really understand this. Kevin claims doctor. I don't really feel like we should lynch either.hey pierre. why mentos over kevin. Mentos claims an investagative role, kevin claims a overwifomed vanilla townie. If we were to lynch one, why should we pick Kevin?
I'm still not convinced by your idea. What if Kevin flips town? You still won't know if you're insane or paranoid and we might lose our doc because of that. Too much risk, too littel reward. If we're really lynching one of your guilties I'd say Pierre the Scumcrow unless he has some epic claim. If you insist on Kevin you'd have to show me how and why Kevin is scummier than Pierre.Gheb, I've already mentioned that Pierre was suspicious to me, which is why he was my n2 investigation. Also, I'm not sure if I can self-investigate, and I wouldn't anyway. Not only would it waste an investigation, but given the flavor this game is based off a lawyer and/or framer would not be terribly unlikely, and if I was planning on self investigating, a framer could hit me to make my results look like I needed the opposite of what I did. For all I know I could self investigate, get an inno, then turn around and lynch Kevin and have him flip town because a framer had been on me and I need to look for innos. Especially in this game, I don't see it being a potentially good benefit.
I agree with you on this.I'm still not convinced by your idea. What if Kevin flips town? You still won't know if you're insane or paranoid and we might lose our doc because of that. Too much risk, too littel reward. If we're really lynching one of your guilties I'd say Pierre the Scumcrow unless he has some epic claim. If you insist on Kevin you'd have to show me how and why Kevin is scummier than Pierre.
no **** that.I do think Kevin is scummier, as I have, ya know, already outlined in my case against him, however I do agree if we were to lynch a guilty Pierre would probably be the safer choice of the two to not risk lynching a doctor. And the reason WHY I would want to lynch a guilty, as said before is yeah, I don't know if I'm insane or paranoid if they flip town, but I do know that if I get an inno it's a scum, instead of townie/if I get a guilty it doesn't mean anything until I have an inno. Regardless, I agree Rockin, Swords, and Cacti need to step it up, we're getting close to crunch time here.
Well, sorry for being pretty **** busy recently for me to not contribute much of D3. I'll do a reread right now and get myself right back to posting.Ride their claim to late game? I claimed pretty late in the game(10 left, by tomorrow we'll be at mylo most likely if we miss scum). Plus, there are people riding doing absolutely nothing to late game who should be a much bigger priority than someone who's at least trying to accomplish something. Honestly right now, it's pretty much been Mac, me, and Gheb talking, occasional posts from you and Marshy, and few and far between posts from everyone else. Honestly as much as I want to figure out my sanity, I'm tempted to lynch someone between Marshy, Rockin, Cacti, Swords, Riddle/Kata because they are doing absolutely NOTHING and barely posting enough to avoid prodding.
I dont mean to be too rude but I looked over your post and I dont really feel like playing anymore tonight. I seem to have trouble tackling what exactly you are talking about sometimes because your diction is opposite what is normally in a mafia game - you are exceedingly vague all the time, your case applies to more than Riddle (almost all of it actually applies to ME also yet you never mention me as a suspect on Day 3 and previously I think you said you thought I was Town), and you fault Riddle for not building more cases after he built one that you think might have merit. I don't know, you seem to form pillows of ideas instead of rocks to stand on, and when I try to climb them and see from your perspective, they just deflate and puff out.
inactivity also isn't a towntell either, like I thought it was in Megamafia. The thing with you 'coasting'/not posting so much is that you at least have both a legit reason and you do contribute to the game. Yeah, D1 you wasn't posting as much as now, but at least you had a sense to wanna share your insights with town, and that carried all throughout now. Riddle however began posting stuff like this...Not to forget that almost everything you say is wrong with him is just inactivity which isn't a scumtell when he is active all across the forum - I believe he was just modkilled in Monster mafia for it (flipped Town too), and he has not made regular posts in a very long time in Paranoiafia.
so it's pretty meh and discouraging to see him still in the game, unconsidered or not lynched. I know inactivity isn't a strong case against him, but he's also havn't been contributing like he used to.Sorry guys. I've just kinda lost interest in mafia in general. I'll make an effort to be active in all my games until they finish those.
Thoughts:
1) Yeah I've been inactive.
2) Kevin made a claim in twilight not before being lynched which implies Governor fishing to me (scummy).
3) I think Mentos is Paranoid.
No way for me to know that Circus was a confirmed townie? Did you not believe The_Truth's full-claim Day 1? His claim to be a mason partner with another player, in addition to his name claim, was very believable. Circus was basically a confirmed townie while he was Circus and not T_T, and if you disagree I will simply point you to the regular vote counts. So, no, there is no "I told you so" coming from me - if there were, I would be telling you it. Also, if I were scum, proxying my vote to Circus would have meant giving the town more power and giving the mafia less power - the opposite being simply keeping my vote to myself and putting it on any lynch I wanted. I really fail to see why you think it was scummy. And yes, I asked KevinM to name claim (not role claim). There was nothing scummy about that.I'm OK with lynching either Pierre the Scumcrow or Riddle toDay. Pierre never really responded to the accusation of him coasting and parroting Circus the whole D2. His response was that he "proxied" his vote to Circus which is a perfect excuse for a scumbag to not take a stance on anything and look credible in case Circus flips town (which he'd only know for sure if he was mafia). He keeps calling Circus a "confirmed" townie but there was no way for Pierre to actually know if Circus is town yesterDay unless Pierre is mafia. He probably just wanted to draw the "I told you" card after Circus' flip. Him wanting the assumed doc to claim so early yesterDay also looks iffy to me.
It really seems like you've started lurking ever since the lynch on me died down. You've contributed the same amount as Marshy on D3.Pierre, I voted you because I thought it'd be good to test mentosman's investigation, and you're the safer one, like other people have said.
unvote vote: rockin
Again, you are frustrating me terribly. You are not providing reasoning for anything, which isn't helping me with my doubts that because you are supposed to be such a great player, the fact that I don't feel your influence on the game at all means you are doing it subtly. Do you understand that?rather go riddle/rockin/pierre
You don't touch on me at all except to say that you support my lynch. Compound, please.It really seems like you've started lurking ever since the lynch on me died down. You've contributed the same amount as Marshy on D3.
I think we need a cacti/Pierre lynch. Kataefi is replacing for riddle, so i will let him get his thoughts together before i say anything.
Explain yourself before i vote you sCumti.
I think this is possibly a good idea.what are peoples thoughts on having truths mason partner claim and forcing kevin to protect him for the rest of the game?
I find your opposition to this idea to be severely questionable, basically because your reasoning is sucky and lacking. Obviously the textbook "directing the doc is bad mkay" doesn't apply here when we have a possibly new clear through a claim, and since the doctor is not confirmed (though he is not countered) it would not be that bad at all, especially considering the majority tried to lynch said doctor yesterday. I don't think that made Macman look scummy at all - I think you look dumb for shutting down the idea. You don't feel like you could use another confirmed townie right about now? Because with Cacti/Rockin/Swords being unimpressive, KevinM being in a strange claim position, Marshy not living up to my expectations, and you claiming cop when a cop is already dead (with a guilty on me and Kevin, no less, meaning you are not sane but still possibly mafia), I could use a bit more clarity right about now and this would provide that. Or are you just not in the same boat as me.Mac, I've said it before to you and its frustrating to have to say it again: stop trying to force a doc claim to do something and take away the ability to wifom the mafia. Worst role to try to direct and its making you look scummy.
Contradictory, much?I am severely lacking info. Only flip that was at all helpful to me was omni's but he didn't make many connects with people day1 so that doesn't help. A new clear would help things alot.
Though it bugs me that pierre agrees with it............