Hrm. I can't say I'm not wavering on the Sinz lynch. He has been unhelpful and he has had fairly poor opinions (in my fairly strong totally awesome buff max to the extreme opinion) and both he and his role show no future increase of usefulness. However, maybe he is just having trouble getting his berings strait and the haunts of the "easy lynch" are already pestering me in the back of my head.
But that's okay! Because there's plenty of people who look scummy!
Isn't that right, The_Truth 
I do in fact have a bit of a bone to pick with KevinM, contrary to the conclusions I had come to earlier.
Yes you've explained like your reasons as well which makes me wonder why you did your huge write up on who you thought was pro-town. Like it's been said before you're just painting targets on people's back which I would think you're a lot smarter then. Like I just don't like the way you're playing normal Marshy for the most part but seemingly have painted targets on various players backs. It's making my second guess your alignment because I know for a fact you're smarter then that so the scum or dumb thing doesn't play for me.
This was your #561 @ Marshy. You said that you do not like the fact that he has explained who he thinks is pro-town, in essence "painting a target on their backs." If I am not mistaken, this is similar to what Omni has been advising me against (though I disagree with him): do not explain who you think is town because then the mafia knows who you trust and will kill them, and instead only say who you think is mafia. From this context, I assumed Omni was comfortable with me as town but simply didn't want me to out who I thought was town because then the mafia would kill them. In contrast, however, you are telling Marshy that you think that he is scummy because he is doing what I did? You are telling him that you think he might be scum because he is saying who he thinks is town and therefore allowing the scum to know who to kill to keep the townies in the dark. But then, that would assume that Marshy is a townie who the scum need to know who he trusts so he can keep him in the dark. Do you like y'know understand this contradiction?
----
On the subject of SwordsRbroken, then, some people have brought up the fact that by using a "disconnections" theory, they do not think he is scum because people have disconnected the string between themselves and him. If I recall correctly, Macman posted a long list of every player at one point disagreeing with SwordsRbroken majorly and/or voting him. In essence, then, they don't think he is scum because he doesn't seem to have any scum partners.
It shouldn't take any explanation to realize how poor this logic is.
You are essentially saying that he's not mafia because everyone has disagreed with him, and the mafia wouldn't disagree with their scum partners. Except for the facts that 1) of course they would (WIFOM, distancing from a weak partner, future bus planning) and 2) if everyone has disagreed with him, then not only would the rest of the mafia have disagreed with him, but
every townie would have, also. Are you telling me that even though every townie has disagreed with him, he is not a logical lynch? Hot. Garbage.
I kinda expect Macman and Omni's responses to that because they seem to be the ones heralding the grand invention of disconnections.
I also don't understand why Macman is his (Swords') primary suspect.
