You may be able to understand something, but it doesn't mean you ''fully'' understand it nor have the ability to hone that understanding. ****
That seems a bit like straw-grasping. If you understand something, "lacking knowledge" doesn't qualify as understanding, yet not understanding. Understanding typically doesn't have a modal aspect to it.
This is the only thing out of all of your oppositions that I agreed with to an extent. I was wrong when I said ''A beautiful harmony''. I should've said ''The manipulative''. Then changed what I had said about miasma into ''Pulls into corruption''. :beezbo:
Mistaking harmony for manipulation is pretty hard to do, AV.
Do you even know what miasma means? This makes completely perfect sense. What the **** are you on about? What Sane said was pretty much like saying,''Gravitates toward the miasma''. As in, the manipulation is brought into corruption. There doesn't have to be ''Us'', you just aren't reading it right. That is what I was talking about. You don't know how to manifest your understanding. You may have an idea what the OP is going for, but it is how you manifest what you've collected that makes the biggest impact on how you choose to see things.
Miasma is a poisonous effluvium. I'm aware of what it is, but the syntax of "pull into miasma" directly preceded by "the marionette's strings" forms an antecedent implication which means "pull the marionette strings into miasma" which, I'm sorry, doesn't make sense unless you extrapolate beyond the malformed structure. I think it's you who has preconceived notions of the poem, 'cause I'm just pointing out grammatical flaws that relegate the poem to silliness at some points.
****ing
Verm, Sane used ''or'' in that sense to generalise how people can have either or of that specific ****ing trait. I know what dissemble means. When I said ''never to be used again'' basically means to hide those lackadaisical traits of ours that makes nothing advance. Hide it ''forever''. Because, you know.. Being lazy is actually a big part of us. So it makes perfect ****ing sense.
That's called amphiboly. In the context, "or" implies a contrasting choice, which doesn't make sense given that indolence and inertia are synonymous. "And" would've been a much more sensible choice. Copula like "and," "or," and "if" hold almost as much, if not more sway in the way a sentence is perceived than the words themselves. Next would be why the OP chose the word "dissembled" rather than "abolished" or "purged." Technically, he could've said "Indolence or inertia must be beaten with a shovel" and it would've achieved the same idea, but the implications of it are so strange that it makes the reader go "...what?"
I read it just fine, Verm.
Then have knack and reading things fabricate sense not
No. That is just your technical BS talking. If we were to understand this world, and ourselves aswell.. There wouldn't be so much bull****. This place would be alot more of a better place. We would have logical peace. You do know.. I killed my ****ing cat because I didn't know how to control my anger when I was younger. Ignorance is alot more ****ing deadlier than you may think it is. -.-
Not a particularly classy choice of words, dude. >_>
I stand by my primary critique. The OP sacrificed vital grammatical determiners and used words with very peculiar implications which made the poem very disjoint. It was easier to interpret it stanza by stanza, but when read as a whole, it's very spasmodic and difficult to follow.
