Khoru
Smash Champion
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2013
- Messages
- 2,530
Dang
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Dang
Fire Emblem x SMTOk, so the first two Fire Emblem games I'm assuming are supposed to be if, but what in the world is the third?
The tears of every Zelda fan...and not only for Zelda Wii U not being there, for this too:Nah. The tears of every Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale fan sounds more plausible .
Dammit! I thought you were Mega Bidoof for a secondI just finished my last essay.
I'm freerrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
I'm still fairly convinced that we'll get a teaser or something for Zelda U, no matter what Aonuma said.
considering freerree, you might want to check for spelling and grammeerI just finished my last essay.
I'm freerrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Finals week does terrible things to your briver....considering freerree, you might want to check for spelling and grammeer
With Mario Maker, Pokemon Super Mystery Dungeon, and an impending Hyrule Warriors 3D official announcement, I'm afraid you've already lost, good sir.I actually hope this E3 is completely free from main Mario/Zelda/Pokemon stuff.
Those are spin-offs.With Mario Maker, Pokemon Super Mystery Dungeon, and an impending Hyrule Warriors 3D official announcement, I'm afraid you've already lost, good sir.
ahh I missed mainThose are spin-offs.
Still, I wouldn't be surprised if Mario/Zelda/Pokemon info is not only there, but the main focus.Those are spin-offs.
Nah not yet it hasn't.Out of curiosity, was the Sonic in Hyrule Warriors leak already proven to be fake?
Because I might have found some veeeery small details that cooouuuuld prove it to be fake...
Let me guess. Sonic Lost World DLC?Out of curiosity, was the Sonic in Hyrule Warriors leak already proven to be fake?
Because I might have found some veeeery small details that cooouuuuld prove it to be fake...
Wasn't the image already put on SEGA of Japan's Twitter though? I thought that's where it was from.Out of curiosity, was the Sonic in Hyrule Warriors leak already proven to be fake?
Because I might have found some veeeery small details that cooouuuuld prove it to be fake...
Nope.Let me guess. Sonic Lost World DLC?
Out of curiosity, was the Sonic in Hyrule Warriors leak already proven to be fake?
Because I might have found some veeeery small details that cooouuuuld prove it to be fake...
It has text detailing the transfer of Tetra and the King on it, if I recall correctly. I say that means it's fake.Nah not yet it hasn't.
But please share, we are all ears.
Then show us!Nope.
(It'll take me some time, because I won't just talk about it, I will show it to you! )
I'm currently working on it, but, like I said, it'll take some time, because I'm taking the pictures during I write the text.Then show us!
Take all the time you wantI'm currently working on it, but, like I said, it'll take some time, because I'm taking the pictures during I write the text.
i have no idea on the second one but if you buy the bundle the second code will be on the digital recipt(which can be found in the eshop)Questions for you guys since I didn't buy Mewtwo.
If I get the bundle that gives you a character on both versions on the Wii U, does it give you a code or does it automatically download that character onto the 3DS?
Second question: If I erase an NNID (not formatting) on a 3DS does it keep the purchased games?
I currently have a secondhand New 3DS XL with a bunch of purchased digital games (FE: Awakening, Phoenix Wright Dual Destinies, Shovel Knight, etc.) and I want to change it to my ID and link it to Wii U, but I want to keep the games.
Nintendo's site does not provide a useful answer.
So I can use the Wii U purchase to get Lucas on the 3DS? Good.i have no idea on the second one but if you buy the bundle the second code will be on the digital recipt(which can be found in the eshop)
yep its all goodSo I can use the Wii U purchase to get Lucas on the 3DS? Good.
Wasn't the image already put on SEGA of Japan's Twitter though? I thought that's where it was from.
that was the claim, but quite literally no one other than the leaker has corroborated thisI thought SEGA posted that "leak".
It is 3 days, 10 hours, 15 minutes until Nintendo's presentation.Man, just barely a day away until the E3 insanity begins.
Full of hype and disappointment
Wow. That was super in-depth, but uh... was it necessary? We all kind of debunked this yesterday. Were there people that still believed it was legit?I'm sorry for the GIGANTIC wall of text here!
(I also do recommend to listen to some Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney music, while reading this.)
So, first of all, I just googled "hyrule warriors 3s tetra wii u" and the second picture in the search was the "original" one.
(This proves it is not hard to find) But it also has exacty the same size as the "Sonic in Hyrule Warriors" picture.
Here they are, for comparison:
So, even though they at the same size, the Sonic one is much more... blurry.
(I will always use the leak on top and the offical one below.)
If this is an official art it seems rather off, that this could happen.
(If it is really fake, the leaker should have taken it in potato quality. )
But this is just a small thing, that could happen... because reasons. (Or not. Who knows?)
Next, I want to talk about the "new" elements.
...Technically there aren't any new ones. Artwork from Lost World, Sega Logo, amiibo Logo, same covers, etc.
The question is, why does every single character get a new character, but not the special guest character?
Well, maybe Sega wanted it to be so? But honestly, I doubt it.
So, next I go into detail, first, the red area and the text. (Not the text itself, because I can't read japanese. )
Most things in these two pictures share the same color, like this:
But now, when I mark the red area with the text in Sonic's picture:
The "marked" areas do have all the same shade of black. It is not 100% identical, probably because the Sonic one is more blurry.
(by the way, the bigger the area, the higher the chance that it stays mostly identical.)
So, why did the main red part change the color, but not those tiny pixels in the KT Logo?
You can now see that the main red part of leak is not the same red as in the official picture.
The same goes for the orange arrow.
It cooouuuld be because they erased the text, yes.
But there is one other detail that cached my attention:
Look closely around the text. In the official one the main red part ends very edgy right before the text, but in the leak...
Yes, It follows the edges of the text relatively strict along the lines.
So, why is it different in those two pictures? I can tell you why.
Because every program, that can use texts, makes the letters very clean.
The edgy colors in the official one are most likely like that, because the quality got reduced.
But the quality reducing doesn't make a picture necessary blurry, like the leak is.
The only theory that could prove my point wrong is that the makers used another program or way, to create the "leak" like it is.
But enough of that, now, the arrow:
you can clearly see that it is pretty much the same case. Very edgy in the less blurry official one, but a lot cleaner in the more blurry leaked one.
So, I can't imagine a scenario, in which I gets LESS edgy, without ruining the whole picture.
Believe me on that, I, as an hobby-artist, studied (more or less) this a long time ago.
But now to an actual thing, that doesn't can get denied due to "quality" reasons.
The shadows.
First, take a look at the whole thing again:
In the official one, you can see a weak shadow around the covers. There is none around the arrow or Tetra and the King.
But in the leak, there are shadows around everything (that isn't a logo).
You could say, "It's for artistic reasons" and I'd proably say: "You're right"
...
BUT why is there ALSO a shadow behind the arrow? Why is it in one, but not in the other?
Again, I can imagine that this is for artistic reasons, too.
...
BUT (again!) then answer me this: Why are there shadows in the official one around the covers, but not behind the ones in the leak?
"What are you talking about? There clearly are shadows behind them!" You might ask... hehe...
Right you are... But take a closer look...
See? In the leak are shadows around the covers... but ONLY on the right and bottom! Where are the shadows on the top and left from the cover?
My theory?
The leaker clearly just forgot to add them, or he didn't even see them, because they are weaker then on the other side!
Here, you even can see some pixels of the shadow, suddenly stopping!
There, I took the lower part from the official one and put it over the leak.(L=Leak O=Official)
You can see the Shadow suddenly stopping, while the rest is almost 100% identical!
I'm confident there is NO excuse for this one...
But wait! There's even more! The background! "The background?" Yes, the background.
This is the point, that, finally, kills the leak. (For me, and hopefully for you, too.)
I have to admit, the leaker did a great job, imitating the background, so that it looks real on the first look.
But he did one SIGNIFICANT mistake.
This is actually the only part, we really need, to prove it fake. (I'm confident!)
If you look at the part of my last picture, you see that it is in comparison to the area on the right from the amiibo a lot more blurry. A. LOT. MORE.
To see what I'll be describing, you might want to look at it from a (little) further away point.
And why is it that? Simple. Because this part was covered before by the 3DS cover! The leaker couldn't recreate the exact pattern, because there wasn't one before!
But this wasn't even the significant mistake I talked about... No, no, no...
THIS IS THE EVERYTHING-UNCOVERING-MISTAKE:
As you can see, there is actually a weak pattern in the background, those areas, I marked. It looks like a crosswalk.
(There are also some areas, where I didn't mark it, so that you can see them better.)
These lines are EVERYWHERE on the Background, but NOT in the leak's area, where the 3DS cover was before!
If this was made by experts, they would have used layers, that means the background should have been ALWAYS the same.
Because I work with Image editors for years now, I can say that this area IS, and I'm 100% sure about taht, this area is, in fact, a attempt to get background somewhere, where wasn't background before. I even demonstrated it:
Of course, the leaker got it better than me, but just look at the part, where the 3DS cover was... At the top, it looks somewhat like in the leak. And even the pattern of the background disappeared...
After all that, the only thing left to say is...
Thank you very much for your attention.
Oh boy, this took me longer than expected... I'm also sure somewhere in between I slipped a little into the role of Phoenix Wright...
Personally, I'm now sure this leak is fake, but if it really turns out to be true... Well... They probably should get a new editor.