There's so much I disagree with this and I see it a ton.
Mainly that smash is a celebration of Nintendo characters. It isnti anymore. It's a celebration of Nintendo and gaming as a whole. Only the first game was a celebration of Nintendo. Melee wasn't supposed to just have ninty characters and that's only around 2 years since the initial celebration. That's the past, and smash 4 proves more than anything that's the case.
Those that "add a bunch of 3rd parties" on thier rosters also add a bunch of 1st parties, and it's ignorant to say otherwise or say that's wrong when ultimately it's thier wants. And the same can be said about people adding more retro characters than most, since thats thier interest. Nothing stopping hoping, you may disagree and debate but people can want whoever they want to and shouldn't be pressured into changing thier rosters.
I haven't got a problem with people who want X character, cause X character would be cool, my main frustration is people like Moviebob, he released a video recently about the upcoming Smash, its people like him who think that characters that appeal to only people like him should be in Smash. Thing about Melee is, even if Snake and Sonic were in Melee, Smash is still something that celebrates mainly Nintendo. Plus Sonic has the whole plus of being the main rival of Nintendo from the Mega Drive/Super Nintendo days, and Snake gets the honour of actually having a game published by Nintendo.
Also thing is, all the other major 3rd party characters, besides Cloud, do actually have an interesting historical footnote that directs them to Nintendo, Pac-man had a game developed by Miyamoto, Bayonetta's series was saved by Nintendo, Megaman has major fan backing and all his games (those ones being the games the original Megaman starred in), except 8, are on a Nintendo console. and Ryu's series got popular on a Nintendo console (Yes Ryu's is a bit of stretch when it comes to a direct connection to Nintendo), and going back to Cloud, his series does actually have the honour of having its first game being published by Nintendo in the USA, he basically made it in cause, his more iconic then the original characters from the first Final Fantasy.
So Smash really isn't a celebration of gaming as whole, still just Nintendo. And here's the thing if Smash became something that celebrates gaming as a whole, we'd possibly lose more of the 1st party characters that aren't major hitters, like Kucas and Shulk, while the games are cult classics, they not really what you call iconic to be in a game that celebrates all of gaming history.
And are you sure about that list that adds a bunch of 1st party characters? Cause I don't a lot of them these days, though I usually delete videos from my youtube history, so I don't get videos that are stupid criticisms of Nintendo in my recommendations.
I really don't think Advance wars is as high as B honestly but it's subjective. I count A being Mario Zelda Pokémon Mario kart, B series IPs like Splatoon, Kirby, DK, Metroid. C ones like Starfox Pikmin or Arms. Advance wars is only D or E imho....no way B. And the ones in D have IPs like Pushmo or Dillon that are more relevant.
Well, I do ranking like this:
S-Tier: Main Mario series, Pokemon, Zelda
A-Tier: Mario Kart, Kirby, Splatoon, Fire Emblem
B-Tier: Metroid, DK, Warioware, Starfox, Pikmin, Mario Sports spin-offs & RPGs
C-Tier: The other Smash series, and things like Golden Sun and Advance Wars, which are fondly remembered.
D-Tier: E-shop titles and classic Retro titles, like Duck Hunt
E-Tier: Dead series. Basically your Custom Robos T_T, Codename Steam (Sorry
Opossum
), and the like.
And so yeah, I moved Advance wars to C-Tier, but I would bump it back to B, if it got a new game, this is the first time I've actually properly thought out how my tier list for series works, since I've always seen Mario, Zelda and Pokemon as S-Tier and Kirby at A-Tier, its just the rest I haven't placed them.
And to note, the B-Tier series are there, cause these are series with dedicated fan bases, but have trouble bringing in newcomers to the series. And I have the non-Mario Kart spin-offs here, cause they have the Mario brand on them, but only core Mario fans are really going to play them.
Eshop titles are D-Tier cause their titles that really only major Nintendo fans will commit to.
DQ protagonist would most likely be from 7 since that's the most iconic one, similar to Cloud and Final Fantasy though the gap between DQ7s and others aren't as big imo.
Are you sure 7 is iconic? I'm not doubting you, I just want 100% proof, so I know who to back, when it comes to who the Dragon Quest rep would be. Though for all I know Enix could just decide to use the mascot of the series, that being the Slime.
And I have to ask, would the DQ7 protagonist beat out the grandfather clause the original Dragon Quest protagonist would have?
Namco and especially Capcom still have a some icons up thier sleeve; Heihachi, Dante or Jill Valentine to name a few. While Square and Ubisoft shouldn't be limited to just Rayman and someone from Dragon Quest as possibilities when there are other IPs like Assassin's Creed which is obviously huge.
Well, Jill hits a certain road block remember, the fire arms problem, since hers would have to be realistic to show properly represent gameplay of Resident Evil. Also here's the thing for me when it comes to Dante, for me, he doesn't stack up to Megaman and Ryu in terms of iconic-ness, that being non-gamers can look at Megaman and Ryu and recognise him, Dante not so much, for me.
And I did say Namco had other series to pull from, I just wasn't sure who they have that stacks up to Pac-man, though no stacks up to Pac-man though. So I have no idea when it comes to Namco.
Well, I just wanted to say something, when it comes to Assassin's Creed, and this can apply to other big named game series in the USA, popular in the USA, doesn't necessarily mean popular in Europe and Japan. Though I will concede Assassin's Creed is popular worldwide, and actually thinking about, Assassin's Creed is more popular then Rayman, I mostly picked Rayman before a Assassin's Creed character, cause a) I think the Smash Dev team would pick Rayman first, though with that said, they could decide to go with the main character from Blag Flag instead, I'm thinking him cause he has a main line series game on a Nintendo console, cause it seems Sakurai doesn't want to brake that rule just yet.
Metroid's one of the worst examples you could've possibly picked for this comparison.
It's not really huge in Japan. The majority of its popularity comes from the West.
Uhh, not really, cause I was saying Youkai Watch could've simply had a fanbase like Metroid, in the sense that its very loyal fan base, that will show up at releases, but otherwise it sticks to itself. Which is what the Metroid fanbase does. And I was talking in terms of worldwide fan base, not just the Japanese fanbase.
rNintendoSwitch ran a
poll of something close to 4000 votes about which franchises they wanted to see on the Switch that haven't been announced already.
The Top 5 (not including Smash Bros which was revealed after the poll had started) is as follows...
1. Animal Crossing
2. F-Zero
3. Mario Party
4. Paper Mario
5. Nintendo Wars
This is super exciting for me to see as you can already guess given the amount of series in this poll was close to 500. The fact that Wars would rank #5 on a huge Nintendo related subreddit like rNintendoSwitch is amazing. I know 4000 is still a rather small sample size in the grand scheme of the Switch's 13Mil+ user base but it's still something to see. Wars even managed to outdo the likes of Pikmin, Luigi's Mansion, Earthbound, Kid Icarus, and WarioWare which is incredible IMO. It makes me really optimistic.
In the same poll, Golden Sun managed to rank #16 which I guess is still a high ranking.
I figured a 3D DK game would have ranked in the Top 20 on this poll though.
Isn't the reddit page mainly frequented by Nintendo fans? So having a more small time series that hasn't seen a release in a while get high up in a poll, shouldn't be to surprising to be honest.
What I find surprising is Mario Party is high up, cause the next one will probably have the car, that everyone seems to hate, cause just because, yeah I still haven't heard a proper criticism for that mode yet, and no, saying its not the old Mario Party style, isn't good enough for me, especially when people kept saying by 8 that style was getting stale. And no one's mentioned away that the old style could be improved to make it less stale to those people who found it stale.
Also to add to the conversation for me right now, the last missing series that every major Nintendo fan feels should be added to Smash, are Golden Sun and Advance Wars, cause their last missing series when it comes to what every Nintendo fan agrees on, or at least to me it does.
With that said, I think that Pushmo and Dillion are actually major enough titles that they could get characters in the next Smash, Dillion especially, since he got an assist trophy in Smash 4 after all.