Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Honestly nobody can make fun of Sonic anymore, the franchise does that itself for us. I can only imagine if they got the social media guys to tap their humour in the games
Because money. And the loading times are STILL awful
I'm okay with him not liking the game, but 2/10 sounds a bit too harsh.I noted that this thread love having drama for some reason from time to time. I don't know, maybe because someone is watching us to make his new anime called "Hokuto no Smash"?
Eh, in any case, I'm still in my bed with my throat sick, far away from the drama of the Internet.
Oh and, Jim Sterling apparantly said that Yooka-Laylee was as bad or even worse as Aliens Colonial Marines, Umbrella Corps and No Man Sky.
Can you feel the salt in the air?
I don't know, I wasn't here when the "7/10 BOTW" case happened.
Wait, he called the bat racist? 2/10?
Anyone reasonable would say the 7/10 is fair, he liked the game, his 7/10 is Good and it said Good, but he had flaws with it on something people all agree could be better
Jim's site didn't get DDoS'ed or however it's spelled because of the Yooka Laylee review and Jim himself said people didn't give him enough **** to laugh at the fanbase
He gave BotW a 7/10 and a bunch of people went berserk about it. God forbid someone doesn't enjoy something as much as you do. The same goes here. Perhaps a 2/10 may be harsh for some, but for others, it's a perfect spot to place it. Standards change from person to person, getting worked up because someone had a vastly different experience to you is silly. Just move on with your day.
Honestly, the 7/10 case seem just silly. Nothing to add on that.
The racist thing was a figurative joke though, it wasn't an actual criticism.
As much as I love a batch of tasty Sanic memes fresh from the oven in the morning, I'd rather the writing of the games not degenerate into just memes all of the time.
After playing the Toybox+ Demo, and watching a bunch of reviews with varying opinions, it's definitely not a 2/10 game.
*gives low score to video game*
7 is reasonable as again, it's 'Good' in his grade and he had legit criticisms
Bull****, because there's no way in hell Shaggy WASN'T a stoner
Not necessarily for the story but stuff like the Eggman Park Announcement stuffAs much as I love a batch of tasty Sanic memes fresh from the oven in the morning, I'd rather the writing of the games not degenerate into just memes all of the time.
I mean this stuff could work great in the games if incorporated as Easter Eggs or secret unlockable stuff or something, but I still want some legitimately compelling adventures with these characters.
After playing the Toybox+ Demo, and watching a bunch of reviews with varying opinions, it's definitely not a 2/10 game.
I mean I hate arbitrary review scores anyway, but the game is not bad by any stretch. Even with the frame rate drops on console and camera problems, it still looks at least decent and fans of the genre will find it at least worth one playthrough.
That said, it definitely has it's quirky moments...
It failed in grabbing people disinterested in the genre because it actively was trying not to. It was made for people who already liked Rare's previous classics and other similar games like Super Mario 64 and Spyro the Dragon.
My point is, because it's banking so hard on that, there's really nothing to make it stand out.
)True, perhaps that's a bad example, because Shaggy is a stoner.
Stop stealing my ideas.
Seeing the issues they're patching along with being reminded JonTron has to be patched out made me devise a Game Theory:
And I bet people are going to datamine the v1.0 release to find all the removed Jontron content.
Mario 64 but there are 78462 stars
Mario 64 could count
Games that focus on having the player collect lots and lots of different kinds of objects in the game, that are required to access certain kinds of content in the game. In order to avoid being overly repetitive, they tend to also have some collectibles be rewards for some kind of mini-game or challenge. 100% completion involves collecting everything. Level design is usually open-ended instead of linear, and they are usually a sub-genre of the platformer genre (though some games like open world RPGs can incorporate Collectathon elements).
Mario 64 isn't really a good example.
That's the dream.
You mean he isnt? :o
I really do wish people stopped pushing the "objective review" bull****. Someone tried arguing that big review outlets are horrible because they review "superfluous" stuff like, story, or character design, they want to know about the "game." Well, last I checked, all of that was part of the game, and can create a wildly different experience. Detailing how a game controls, or what button "jump" is mapped to doesn't tell me anything about the experience.
I don't think there nothing inherently wrong with a numerical score, but it should not replaced a well thought-out piece. Getting people to actually read the full review is closer to the actual issue. Too many people just look at the number and stop there. Metacritc can be useful to collect and thoroughly read multiple opinions.
There never was in the first place
Well the best way to get people to focus on the review rather than the number is to just remove the number entirely and let the words speak.
Speaking of Club Penguin, I started up a YouTube channel and created five videos where I played it in its last days. They're my first YouTube videos though, so they're really unprofessional.
