D
Deleted member
Guest
Urgh, nevermind, I'm gonna wait until lv 42, because
The Move Reminder is at Mt. Lanakila. I'd rather have a weakachu until lv 42 than that.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No, he sadly can't be SOS'd. Wanted his shiny to...Dumb question: Can Wimpod call for help?
What about Mean Look or Spirit Shackle?No, he sadly can't be SOS'd. Wanted his shiny to...
He runs at half hp to, ending a battle.
you can use them and it wont run, but it also doesn't call for backup if you do. Which is an interesting mechanic.What about Mean Look or Spirit Shackle?
AM2R & Pokemon Uranium Are No Longer Nominees For The Game Awards “Best Fan… https://t.co/r8USv7O2pI pic.twitter.com/JIOvNG8ldq
— My Nintendo News (@MyNintendoNews) November 20, 2016
They're unofficial hacks. They really can't promote this kind of stuff, regardless of their feelings on it. They want people to buy official games, after all.Boy Nintendo must be fun at parties.
AM2R & Pokemon Uranium Are No Longer Nominees For The Game Awards “Best Fan… https://t.co/r8USv7O2pI pic.twitter.com/JIOvNG8ldq
— My Nintendo News (@MyNintendoNews) November 20, 2016
I always thought the fan game section was just waiting for legal trouble. I'm not sure why its there to begin with.Boy Nintendo must be fun at parties.
AM2R & Pokemon Uranium Are No Longer Nominees For The Game Awards “Best Fan… https://t.co/r8USv7O2pI pic.twitter.com/JIOvNG8ldq
— My Nintendo News (@MyNintendoNews) November 20, 2016
Probably cause it's fairly well known. That said, agreed. The section doesn't work for video game awards. If it was about their opinions on fanart/fanfiction of the various Nintendo games, that'd be different.I always thought the fan game section was just waiting for legal trouble. I'm not sure why its there to begin with.
That said, why is Pokemon Uranium even there?
It's kinda bad.
I can understand why fan games are there. They are still games after all. I could never explain why they would take time in the Game Awards and rate Fanart/Fanfiction.it was about their opinions on fanart/fanfiction of the various Nintendo games, that'd be different.
Well I mean those are their own series. You wouldn't want someone else benefitting off something you owned.Boy Nintendo must be fun at parties.
AM2R & Pokemon Uranium Are No Longer Nominees For The Game Awards “Best Fan… https://t.co/r8USv7O2pI pic.twitter.com/JIOvNG8ldq
— My Nintendo News (@MyNintendoNews) November 20, 2016
I mean, the Doom guys liked the Doom Fangame.Well I mean those are their own series. You wouldn't want someone else benefitting off something you owned.
Weren't they in because of fan votes though?I mean, the Doom guys liked the Doom Fangame.
So it isn't unprecedented.
I'm just saying, this should have been something the Game Awards saw coming.
Not what I'm saying.Weren't they in because of fan votes though?
I'm talking about the legal thing. It'd be different with non-fangames. Not saying that they should have stuff like fanfiction there, just pointing out how those are far less taken down, even with legal issues. I worded that, poorly, so I apologizes.I can understand why fan games are there. They are still games after all. I could never explain why they would take time in the Game Awards and rate Fanart/Fanfiction.
Indeed. They can be quite amazing as is. Although I think the issue could be a difference between a hack and a fangame. But the key issue to companies is using their IP, not necessarily modifying their games. Of course, anybody trying to get money off of somebody's IP without permission is in the wrong by default. Don't steal and try to make money off somebody else's work, mmkay?Not what I'm saying.
I'm saying a Fan Games Section in general is a legal mess and probably should have been avoided.
Not to downplay the quality of said games, but its a big risk.
Only bad things I heard about Uranium were ****ty designs and a glitch in which if 2 specific pokemon fight, one can never moveI always thought the fan game section was just waiting for legal trouble. I'm not sure why its there to begin with.
That said, why is Pokemon Uranium even there?
It's kinda bad.
Now that glitch is awful.Only bad things I heard about Uranium were ****ty designs and a glitch in which if 2 specific pokemon fight, one can never move
The pacing and difficulty curve were definitely weird, the writing was okay as far as I got, as for lag, yeah the framerate drops like it's hot at any given moment and then there's the weird bugs like near constant critical hits.Now that glitch is awful.
Reminds me of Wobbufett.
Regardless, I've heard complaints about pace, cringey writing and lag.
Dunno how true those are but man...
Those designs are ugly...
They're not hacks, they are games built from the ground up. There is a difference.Started Pokemon Sun;
I didn't really bother to try and get perfect Nature's, etc. Just got a average Litten. That said, I named my character after Mammon, and so far, Litten(Flamed Mane), Pikipek(Cockatrice), Wingull(Wingsun), Pichu(Mousetro), Grubbin(Crawler), Slowpoke(Big Mouth), and Caterpie(Gloom Wing). For clarification, they're named after Quest 64 monsters
They're unofficial hacks. They really can't promote this kind of stuff, regardless of their feelings on it. They want people to buy official games, after all.
What? You're saying this doesn't look like a perfect pokemon to you?Now that glitch is awful.
Reminds me of Wobbufett.
Regardless, I've heard complaints about pace, cringey writing and lag.
Dunno how true those are but man...
Those designs are ugly...
With AM2R available for free, there is literally no reason to spend 3 bucks on the eshop for the original. That's a case in which it WOULD hurt salesAnd please don't use the BS argument of "they hurt sales". Metroid isn't selling new products right now
On the bright side, it will be fun seeing Geoff Keighley call them out on this like he called out Konami last year. It might just be the boot up the butt they need.
That thing is a Pokemon?What? You're saying this doesn't look like a perfect pokemon to you?
![]()
I think they're all coded not to be shiny.Can you find the UB's in Shiny naturally?
You're implying that Nintendo does anything to promote that release of Metroid II or make people aware it exists. It's a done product. If it didn't sell when it first came out, it won't sell now. I could also make the argument that the existence of AM2R encourages sales of the original due to curiosity. People might want to see how it actually differs.With AM2R available for free, there is literally no reason to spend 3 bucks on the eshop for the original. That's a case in which it WOULD hurt sales
Geoff's kind of a shill I hear, and if Nintendo's sponsoring VGA, he'd sooner piss himself on stage than give them ****, They're providing his job for him there
My bad. However, it's the same issue for companies regardless. It's using their IP to create works that could take away sales from official ones.They're not hacks, they are games built from the ground up. There is a difference.
Of course they don't actually hurt sales(depends the work though, but it doesn't usually hurt Pkemon ones. It probably did hurt Federation Force sales, though. Also, Gamefreak/etc. aren't keen on people using their IP). But that's still what the company goes with, and being they own the IP, and it's not a parody of the work in question, they can legally have it taken down.And please don't use the BS argument of "they hurt sales". Metroid isn't selling new products right now (nobody cares about Federation Force anymore and not many did in the first place, and Nintendo knows this), and Pokemon just had a record breaking shipment, and even in this very thread, I have seen people talk about buying three potential versions of Gen 7, on top of whatever merchandise comes out. Pokémon Uranium is not hurting anyone or anything.
This does not apply to actual fangames in itself. The fans are a part of it due to buying games, at least in the companies' view. Remember, this is Nintendo taking it down. Think like a businessman in this case, not a consumer. I'm not saying I agree with the action(besides legal issues that could cause unnecessary drama)And hell, the Game Awards are not about selling stuff in the first place. They are about celebrating the people that make the indusrty so great, and fans are a part of that.
No, it actually shows that they think fangames take from their IP's. This isn't comparable to fanficiton/fanart, as they are entirely different things. A fangame is something people can get instead of of their games. This is a legit fear they have, even if it rarely happens(but it can, and that's the problem for them). Applies the same way for hacks, in this case. Of course, modifying a rom is actually illegal compared to making a fangame. The thing is, for fanworks? They can be considered a problem if they're not a parody of a work. This is why it's so easy for them to take down a fangame(again, hacks are easy to take down cause they can be considered illegal for modified actual content, not making your own content entirely simply using an IP). Do I think it's silly they're taking down the fangames? Yes. However, fangames were always iffy to have at an awards ceremony. Especially when Nintendo would be promoting unofficial works of their IP's. That alone is a legit reason to take it down. It's why they can barely say much about Project M besides "It exists", which is the most positive allowed without making it look like they're promoting what is a hack.All this shows is that Nintendo is still behind the times in regards to the changing climate of the video game industry. In a world where SEGA is putting out one of the most hotly anticipated Sonic games in years due to help from fan developers, and where we have official mod support for some console games, Nintendo insists on being the spoiled brat of the class that won't dare share it's toys (or even reap the benefits they would get from doing so).
They're fine for taking down fangames, especially ones they took down from being downloaded. This is a smart thing to do. If they were to actually let them go for a ceremony(which promotes it), then the fact they took them down in the first place looks inconsistent. They already chose to be against those fangames. They can't go back on that.On the bright side, it will be fun seeing Geoff Keighley call them out on this like he called out Konami last year. It might just be the boot up the butt they need.
It is in UraniumThat thing is a Pokemon?
That's what I thought...Eh, I like shiny BuzzwoleI think they're all coded not to be shiny.
Except sales would STILL be hurt, and THAT bothers Nintendo there. If you sold something and someone across the street gave away something better for free, you'd be pissed too. I take business classes, I think I understand this situation a bit more than you doYou're implying that Nintendo does anything to promote that release of Metroid II or make people aware it exists. It's a done product. If it didn't sell when it first came out, it won't sell now.
And that's not what you said last year when he called out Konami.
If it's being sold on the VC, it is not a "done" product. That means it's active. It's done when it cannot be sold anymore on the VC, which is never. That's how business works. If they take off the ability to download it, then you can claim this. It's not about it being advertising, it's about whether it's actually available or not. I learned that ages ago where I work. Advertisements totally does get more sales, yes. But products will sell until they cannot be sold any longer(like the materials are gone). The VC version is now gone(and why would it be?), so until the Wii U itself no longer can go online, and Metroid II isn't on any other VC anymore, it's an active product.You're implying that Nintendo does anything to promote that release of Metroid II or make people aware it exists. It's a done product. If it didn't sell when it first came out, it won't sell now. I could also make the argument that the existence of AM2R encourages sales of the original due to curiosity. People might want to see how it actually differs.
Last year is irrelevant. Kabuto Gwen, like other people, can change their minds. There's possibly other context(like not liking a company as much as another one. I mean, we all have bias, and that's fine).And that's not what you said last year when he called out Konami.
No, the fans absolutely deserve recognition for years of work they put into their fan games. I'm not speaking as a consumer, but as creator myself. If fans are making these labours of love, and people want to give them an award for it, Nintendo should at least allow them to accept that award. It's one thing to take the games down out of fear of sales being hurt. It's another to block the creators off from any and all recognition for their work after the fact. The award itself would literally hurt nobody and shouldn't have any legal issue, especially when the games have already been taken down.My bad. However, it's the same issue for companies regardless. It's using their IP to create works that could take away sales from official ones.
Of course they don't actually hurt sales(depends the work though, but it doesn't usually hurt Pkemon ones. It probably did hurt Federation Force sales, though. Also, Gamefreak/etc. aren't keen on people using their IP). But that's still what the company goes with, and being they own the IP, and it's not a parody of the work in question, they can legally have it taken down.
This does not apply to actual fangames in itself. The fans are a part of it due to buying games, at least in the companies' view. Remember, this is Nintendo taking it down. Think like a businessman in this case, not a consumer. I'm not saying I agree with the action(besides legal issues that could cause unnecessary drama)
No, it actually shows that they think fangames take from their IP's. This isn't comparable to fanficiton/fanart, as they are entirely different things. A fangame is something people can get instead of of their games. This is a legit fear they have, even if it rarely happens(but it can, and that's the problem for them). Applies the same way for hacks, in this case. Of course, modifying a rom is actually illegal compared to making a fangame. The thing is, for fanworks? They can be considered a problem if they're not a parody of a work. This is why it's so easy for them to take down a fangame(again, hacks are easy to take down cause they can be considered illegal for modified actual content, not making your own content entirely simply using an IP). Do I think it's silly they're taking down the fangames? Yes. However, fangames were always iffy to have at an awards ceremony. Especially when Nintendo would be promoting unofficial works of their IP's. That alone is a legit reason to take it down. It's why they can barely say much about Project M besides "It exists", which is the most positive allowed without making it look like they're promoting what is a hack.
They're fine for taking down fangames, especially ones they took down from being downloaded. This is a smart thing to do. If they were to actually let them go for a ceremony(which promotes it), then the fact they took them down in the first place looks inconsistent. They already chose to be against those fangames. They can't go back on that.
Also, with The Pokemon Company and Gamefreak around, it's no surprise that a Pokemon Fangame got taken down. If it had uses entirely unique stuff, and a different name, that'd be fine. If it's not making money, they couldn't go after it in general even if it used the same engine, because tons of developers reuse engines anyway to make unique games. A lot of this is IP protection and making sure sales feel guaranteed. And no, the sales point is not bull**** either. It should be, but it isn't in reality.
I study both business and the creative and legal processes of the game industry. But you don't see me waving that around as an argument.Except sales would STILL be hurt, and THAT bothers Nintendo there. If you sold something and someone across the street gave away something better for free, you'd be pissed too. I take business classes, I think I understand this situation a bit more than you do
Konami practically left the gaming industry, and they didn't bloody sponsor VGA. You're not going to go "My boss is such a ****, I hate his guts and hope his wife wants a divorce" when he's right there, are you? Same situation
You're not thinking like a business and tried comparing 1 scummy thing (Uranium wasn't even Nintendo according to the creator and it's likely the organizers decided they didn't want to accidentally piss off Nintendo) to a company that **** on it's fans and pretty much tried to go bankrupt. I think I have more right to be flaunting my ego, especially considering how many arguments your condescending tone caused in the past. Just sayingNo, the fans absolutely deserve recognition for years of work they put into their fan games. I'm not speaking as a consumer, but as creator myself. If fans are making these labours of love, and people want to give them an award for it, Nintendo should at least allow them to accept that award. It's one thing to take the games down out of fear of sales being hurt. It's another to block the creators off from any and all recognition for their work after the fact. The award itself would literally hurt nobody and shouldn't have any legal issue, especially when the games have already been taken down.
And yes, the sales point is BS in reality. It's irrelevant because in reality, these fan games have not actually hurt Nintendo's sales. The burden of proof for that argument is on you, and until you prove it, it's a BS argument.
I study both business and the creative and legal processes of the game industry. But you don't see me waving that around as an argument.
Stop assuming you know more than others for no reason. Keep your ego out of it.