Ivander
Smash Legend
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2014
- Messages
- 11,144
I’ve been feeling more strongly lately about Smash’s desperate need for a samurai,
You name the role/class/etc, Nintendo more than likely has a character for that role/class/etc.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I’ve been feeling more strongly lately about Smash’s desperate need for a samurai,
If Baiken gets a shield special counter I will laugh so hard.And while counters have a bad stigma in the Smash scene, imagine a counter that can lead to different moves based on input like in Xrd.
I'm fairly ambivalent to GG as well, but I'm not sure anything will whelm me more than the Tekken character we got.I just personally don't want a Guilty Gear character in general.
It would whelm me.
My response to that will always be: "If they made a big impact and have so many fans, why haven't they been in more games?"I think if the character made a big impact and has a lot of fans that would love to see them in Smash, that should be the only thing that matters.
But...the fact that they were in HW means they're aren't one-shot characters. They're in spinoffs because of their popularity.For example, I feel like Skull Kid and Midna would probably make for more exciting Smash characters than a recurring character like Beetle. Their fanbases have kept them both relevant over the years despite each only appearing once in the main series. Their appearance in Hyrule Warriors is a testament to that.
Gray Fox is in, like, 5 MG games!Gray Fox is the only one I can think of atm but there are others I'm sure but it's definitely a rare category.
Mario and Pokemon are MUCH bigger franchises than Zelda.I mean if current zelda is well represented then mario only needs:
Mario, Luigi, Peach and Bowser
Pokemon only needs:
Pokemon Trainer and pikachu maybe mewtwo if im charitable
If Baiken got in she should get her tether mechanic for the accidental SD/double KO shenanigans.If Baiken gets a shield special counter I will laugh so hard.
If she gets her debuff counter I will laugh even harder.
I mean...she is though. All the non-Samus Fighters are enemies.Gonna be real. The "Zelda doesn't need more characters it's about exploring," is giving me the same vibes as "Metroid is about isolation, Samus should be alone on the roster."
I need Sol in Smash so they path is cleared for better ArcSys characters. Like Kunio.I just personally don't want a Guilty Gear character in general.
Yes...Nintendo will have a D-tier character for that role/class/etc.View attachment 392477
You name the role/class/etc, Nintendo more than likely has a character for that role/class/etc.
Are you sure you want one-offs from Kirby, or do you actually want one-role-of-importance Kirby characters with squandered potential, that at least got to be included as fully playable characters in Star Allies but have barely appeared since? The latter is more accurate to my common plight.Everyone seems to be talking about one-offs from Zelda games. Me…?
I want to see one-offs from Kirby become playable in Smash Bros.
Speaking of, it's weird how the support behind Takamaru basically died off ever since Ultimate. It was already far less in Ultimate than with Smash 4 and even Brawl, but it's baffling. Especially since amongst retro picks he was always the most popular and highly requested. Up to the point he was the more expected pick even compared to Duck Hunt. Which is wild now I think about it, cause nobody questions Duck Hunt's inclusion since they made the roster. Just goes to show...View attachment 392477
You name the role/class/etc, Nintendo more than likely has a character for that role/class/etc.
Just want to clarify real quick that I didn’t actually mean that I want all characters to have meters or overbearing gimmicks, just that with new fighters “freshness” and originality are clearly a priority and that it’s a shame classic characters aren’t being given a chance for a makeover even when it feels called for.Honestly the most refreshing thing to me right now is a straightforward and effective character, without a big crazy gimmick. Someone who can just be organically distinct. There are many ways to innovate in more natural feeling ways and I really am not looking for Samus with limited missile quantity or full on TOTK Link or something.
You look at someone like K Rool or Incineroar and they were able to stand out without something overbearing like a meter, instead they unique passive traits or fulfilled lesser explored archetypes. Blunderbuss, Crown Boomerang, Alolan Whip, Revenge all take familiar concepts and do something we haven’t seen with them. That’s enough for me to feel like a new character is pulling their weight creatively. After the tenth meter and comeback mechanic it stops being unique, to be honest.
I agree that we could use some freshening up toward some of the old guard, the aforementioned characters still feel fresh and new, but I raise an eyebrow at the examples given here. Just not my preference and got a little exhausting toward the end.
Honestly if everyone's gonna have some sort of meter mechanic, we might as well just make FS Meter the default and give certain characters extra ways to mess around with it. One of the big tenets of Smash was that everyone had more-or-less the same inputs, so everyone was easy to get a hang of. Min Min and Kazuya's kits are super cool, but they also seriously stick out like a sore thumb when their control schemes are so notably different. And like, I can pull off the quarter circles just fine, it's just the mild but noticeable lack of consistency. Just give everyone optional command inputs alongside the normal ones or something to even it out.Honestly the most refreshing thing to me right now is a straightforward and effective character, without a big crazy gimmick. Someone who can just be organically distinct. There are many ways to innovate in more natural feeling ways and I really am not looking for Samus with limited missile quantity or full on TOTK Link or something.
You look at someone like K Rool or Incineroar and they were able to stand out without something overbearing like a meter, instead they unique passive traits or fulfilled lesser explored archetypes. Blunderbuss, Crown Boomerang, Alolan Whip, Revenge all take familiar concepts and do something we haven’t seen with them. That’s enough for me to feel like a new character is pulling their weight creatively. After the tenth meter and comeback mechanic it stops being unique, to be honest.
I agree that we could use some freshening up toward some of the old guard, the aforementioned characters still feel fresh and new, but I raise an eyebrow at the examples given here. Just not my preference and got a little exhausting toward the end.
Thats not the point Zelda is still a big franchise and definitly bigger than Fe which has 2 characters more!Mario and Pokemon are MUCH bigger franchises than Zelda.
well the ratio seems reasonable to meI decided to look at the franchise included in Smash. I wanted to compare the number of first party franchises with characters and the number of third party franchises with characters. There are 40 franchises with playable characters. There are 25 first party franchises and 15 third party franchises. As a bonus there are 9 first party franchises with stages but no playable characters.
First Party
Third Party
- Super Mario
- Donkey Kong
- The Legend of Zelda
- Metroid
- Yoshi
- Kirby
- Star Fox
- Pokemon
- Earthbound
- F-Zero
- Ice Climber
- Fire Emblem
- Game & Watch
- Kid Icarus
- Wario
- Pikmin
- R.O.B.
- Animal Crossing
- Wii Fit
- Punch Out!!
- Mii
- Xenoblade Chronicles
- Duck Hunt
- Splatoon
- ARMS
First Party Franchises with No Playable Characters
- Metal Gear
- Sonic the Hedgehog
- Mega Man
- Pac-Man
- Street Fighter
- Final Fantasy
- Bayonetta
- Castlevania
- Persona
- Dragon Quest
- Banjo Kazooie
- Fatal Fury
- Minecraft
- Tekken
- Kingdom Hearts
- Electroplankton
- Pictochat
- Balloon Fight
- Nintendogs
- Find Mii
- Tomodacchi Life
- Wrecking Crew
- Pilotwings
- Wii Sports
What do you think of this ratio of first party to third party content? I know there are more franchises included, but characters and stages are the ones with the most billing.
Same. It’s still primarily a Nintendo crossover so it makes sense they’d get the majority of characters. There are tons of third party characters that would be awesome to see in Smash so I wouldn’t really want to lower the ratio there either. I could potentially see it going 50/50 at some point between Nintendo and third party but I doubt it would ever go past that. I will say that the bulk of my personal most wanted characters at this point are third party so I wouldn’t mind the ratio getting a bit closer to that 50/50 mark.well the ratio seems reasonable to me
nintendo has hundreds of franchises, it's just everyone's caught up in things like relevance and what have you that no one gives the bucket load of nintendo franchises not used a glance. and even then there's all the people who want to be "big" series so even all the franchises that have had revivals in recent years aren't good enough for them. Advance Wars, Big Brain Academy, Famicom Detective Club, Another Code, Endless Ocean and the like are all in the best position they've been in for years. but barely anyone is going to give them a look inSame. It’s still primarily a Nintendo crossover so it makes sense they’d get the majority of characters. There are tons of third party characters that would be awesome to see in Smash so I wouldn’t really want to lower the ratio there either. I could potentially see it going 50/50 at some point between Nintendo and third party but I doubt it would ever go past that. I will say that the bulk of my personal most wanted characters at this point are third party so I wouldn’t mind the ratio getting a bit closer to that 50/50 mark.
As far as franchise representation goes, I do see that skewing more towards third party as time goes on because Nintendo only has so many unique franchises. Third party franchises also tend to get much fewer characters over all so it’s logical that there would be a wider range of franchises with playable representation. Since first party franchises like Mario, Pokemon, and Fire Emblem get so many characters, you’d still likely have a good amount more individual Nintendo characters even if third parties eventually pass them in the number of franchises with playable fighters.
True. I’m not sure all of those really have a particular character that would make sense as a fighter but I see your point. I think it depends if Sakurai/Nintendo want to keep the branding of a “celebration of gaming” or want to go back to their roots as a Nintendo crossover with a few guest fighters from other companies. I could see them doing either but I feel like the current direction is likely to generate more hype and sales. What I’d love to see are some more smaller third party characters and franchise representation but those don’t really fit with either approach unfortunately.nintendo has hundreds of franchises, it's just everyone's caught up in things like relevance and what have you that no one gives the bucket load of nintendo franchises not used a glance. and even then there's all the people who want to be "big" series so even all the franchises that have had revivals in recent years aren't good enough for them. Advance Wars, Big Brain Academy, Famicom Detective Club, Another Code, Endless Ocean and the like are all in the best position they've been in for years. but barely anyone is going to give them a look in
Any franchise can have a fighter if they put their imagination to it. Although that seems to be where they fall downTrue. I’m not sure all of those really have a particular character that would make sense as a fighter but I see your point. I think it depends if Sakurai/Nintendo want to keep the branding of a “celebration of gaming” or want to go back to their roots as a Nintendo crossover with a few guest fighters from other companies. I could see them doing either but I feel like the current direction is likely to generate more hype and sales. What I’d love to see are some more smaller third party characters and franchise representation but those don’t really fit with either approach unfortunately.
Reminder that even when Square and Nintendo partnered up in two different instances to create Mario spinoffs with fairly large rosters, Geno still didn't show up.For someone like Geno, there's an obvious answer. Being co-owned by 2 companies makes him harder to put in stuff.
But then Alpha Dream decided “hey Geno would be cool to throw into Mario & Luigi” and had no issues doing so.Reminder that even when Square and Nintendo partnered up in two different instances to create Mario spinoffs with fairly large rosters, Geno still didn't show up.
This honestly feels about right, mostly Nintendo, but only just. I'm honestly expecting it to go the same as ultimate, where there's mostly first party in the base game, mostly third party in the dlc, with most first party characters being from existing franchises, and most third party ones being from new franchises.I decided to look at the franchise included in Smash. I wanted to compare the number of first party franchises with characters and the number of third party franchises with characters. There are 40 franchises with playable characters. There are 25 first party franchises and 15 third party franchises. As a bonus there are 9 first party franchises with stages but no playable characters.
First Party
Third Party
- Super Mario
- Donkey Kong
- The Legend of Zelda
- Metroid
- Yoshi
- Kirby
- Star Fox
- Pokemon
- Earthbound
- F-Zero
- Ice Climber
- Fire Emblem
- Game & Watch
- Kid Icarus
- Wario
- Pikmin
- R.O.B.
- Animal Crossing
- Wii Fit
- Punch Out!!
- Mii
- Xenoblade Chronicles
- Duck Hunt
- Splatoon
- ARMS
First Party Franchises with No Playable Characters
- Metal Gear
- Sonic the Hedgehog
- Mega Man
- Pac-Man
- Street Fighter
- Final Fantasy
- Bayonetta
- Castlevania
- Persona
- Dragon Quest
- Banjo Kazooie
- Fatal Fury
- Minecraft
- Tekken
- Kingdom Hearts
- Electroplankton
- Pictochat
- Balloon Fight
- Nintendogs
- Find Mii
- Tomodacchi Life
- Wrecking Crew
- Pilotwings
- Wii Sports
What do you think of this ratio of first party to third party content? I know there are more franchises included, but characters and stages are the ones with the most billing.
And removed him in the remake. Ou...But then Alpha Dream decided “hey Geno would be cool to throw into Mario & Luigi” and had no issues doing so.
I normally don’t really care much about alternate versions of existing characters but I feel like Ganon and Ganondorf would be different enough in both design and moveset that he’d be a cool addition. I really like Ganon’s design in the Oracle games.Speaking of something diffrent than link and zelda!
Whats your opionion on eow Ganon joining smash?
I mean its a modern take on classic pig ganon (also this is the first time we got a modern artwork of pig ganon) also he looks diffrent from the humans so even haters of the artstyle should like him!
View attachment 392483
I think Classic ganon should at the very least be a boss/ Spirit i think he earned that spot instead of the 3d ones!
Now I just need a Chrono Trigger remake. Magus is one of my favorite game characters so it would be cool to have something to give me a bit more hope there like SMRPG remake did for Geno. I know Crono is more likely if we do somehow get a character but there’s at least a case that could be made for Magus. At least we got that enhanced port of Chrono Cross on the Switch.TBH I definitely think out of the older niche fan requests, Geno's really just lucky that the Mario RPG remake is a thing, that gives him extended relevance and time in the spotlight in the speculation scene and also help further his momentum he's had since Smash 4 rejuvenated his online support base.
I really thought the Geno fandom would go back to where it was after Brawl, mostly dissipated and in the background after he failed to get in, but the SMRPG remake at least gives them another leg to stand for awhile longer.
Well, if anything, it is not just any character, or just those playable in Star Allies. I was also thinking a villain like Nightmare, who is already an assist trophy, or Dark Matter in his sword using form in that Game Boy Game.Are you sure you want one-offs from Kirby, or do you actually want one-role-of-importance Kirby characters with squandered potential, that at least got to be included as fully playable characters in Star Allies but have barely appeared since? The latter is more accurate to my common plight.
I know. Very sad....Reminder that even when Square and Nintendo partnered up in two different instances to create Mario spinoffs with fairly large rosters, Geno still didn't show up.
I don't agree. I don't like it when playing your character optimally means you never get to see your big flashy super move.Honestly if everyone's gonna have some sort of meter mechanic, we might as well just make FS Meter the default and give certain characters extra ways to mess around with it.
I think pig Ganon should remain a Boss and not be a Fighter.Whats your opionion on eow Ganon joining smash?
A few I know are still quite strong are: Isaac, Bandana Dee, Dixie Kong, Geno, Waluigi, Crash Bandicoot, Doom Dude / Guy / Bro / Mass Murderer , speaking of, Master Chief, and there's still plenty more to think of. But out of my head, these really stand out.It's hard to gauge which characters are the most hyped or which have truly fallen off because of how we're currently directly out of the smash cycle. I'm sure certain characters' fanbases will flare up again when we're back in the thick of it (And recency bias shifts towards expecting first-party nintendo faces above all else) but as for now we're only really able to get the consensus of the absolute hardcore that discuss smash rosters 3 years after the current game's support has ceased.
I kinda wish there was another fan-made poll that'd make the rounds. It'd be biased, sure, but it'd be fun to see what the internet now thinks should be most-wanted this far out.
An aside; I think we're kinda running off a false assumption that every character in a wanted character's franchise will stay when discussing them. Imagine if, say, Meta Knight was cut while BWD comes into the next Smash. Not saying it'd happen.. but I do wonder what tradeoffs will happen when all the dust clears.
And the Scarlet and Violet Spirits.x.com
x.com
In case anyone missed them, the three spirits from unconnected third party games (including Zagreus from Hades) have been added back to the Spirit Board. That should mean that the only spirits that aren't back (if people missed the original event) are the ones from Princess Peach: Showtime and Super Mario Bros. Wonder.
This design not even having a Trophy/Sticker/Spirit is already downright ridiculous.Speaking of something diffrent than link and zelda!
Whats your opionion on eow Ganon joining smash?
I mean its a modern take on classic pig ganon (also this is the first time we got a modern artwork of pig ganon) also he looks diffrent from the humans so even haters of the artstyle should like him!
View attachment 392483
I think Classic ganon should at the very least be a boss/ Spirit i think he earned that spot instead of the 3d ones!
With Dragon Ball FighterZ graphics!Now I just need a Chrono Trigger remake.
That would be perfect. I imagine keeping that graphical quality in an RPG would be a lot harder than a fighting game though. Fighting games typically have better graphics than a lot of other genres just because they don’t have to load as much on the screen at once. If they can make it work, I’d absolutely love that.With Dragon Ball FighterZ graphics!
Most of them aren't even Samurai. Lyn's not a Samurai. Vergil's not a Samurai. Not even Sephiroth is a Samurai. A character using a katana is no basis for being termed a class of the system. Being a member of the Japanese warrior caste derives from a following towards the ruling executive of that caste, not because of a git being decent at wielding a one-edge chopping knife. I mean, if Mario went around sayin' he was a plumber just because he took out some turtles and flies that came out of some giant pipes, they'd call him a looney!I need Sol in Smash so they path is cleared for better ArcSys characters. Like Kunio.
Yes...Nintendo will have a D-tier character for that role/class/etc.
Remember when Smash added Urban Champ as it's street fighting rep instead of Ryu!
There's a dozen better video game samurai than Takamaru.
I think it would be a little easier just because Crono Trigger is very zoomed out so the models wouldn't have to be so detailed outside of cutscenes, which generally swap out models in games anyway.That would be perfect. I imagine keeping that graphical quality in an RPG would be a lot harder than a fighting game though.
Yeah, I feel like a drastic change like that is probably better saved for a sequel. I think it could still work for a remake if they adjusted the camera and animations while keeping the general gameplay in tact. The Mana remakes did something similar and seem to have worked out pretty well. I love the Octopath style but I feel it’s best suited for the Final Fantasy remakes. Chrono Trigger’s anime style makes sense to go for a cel shaded approach. I’d be happy either way though.I think trying to give Chrono Trigger super high-quality graphics while keeping the gameplay and camera intact would look super awkward and not even look good. As overused as it is, HD-2D is probably the best way to handle a remake if the graphics need an update, which they don't imo.
...to tie this to speculation, uhhhhh, Robo for Smash!