I think it could continue after Fighters Pass 2 but if it doesn’t I wouldn’t be to surprised. By the time Fighters Pass 2 is finished (if it really is finishing in December of 2021) then the Switch will be 4 months shy of being 5 years old. Life cycles for consoles usually last 5-8 years. Which means Smash could be getting prepared to move over to the Switch’s successor. I mean if we did get another pass that could feasibly last then another year with just 4 characters and that would mean the Switch would be 4 months shy of being 6 YEARS OLD. That’s insane to think about.
I think we might get another Fighters Pass of 4 characters but if that happens I’m 100% betting we’re getting an Ultimate DX in the following years... then that just opens up another can of worms. Do they stop with base DX like Mario Kart 8? Keep going like they did Pokken? The ride just gets wilder.
I think one of the motivations for wanting more after FP2 is if they do move on to the next game—what would they do to be better than Ultimate? It’s why I wanted Ultimate to be a perennial title that just keeps getting new seasons, and I’m glad it’s gone as long as it has. If it does end on FP2, I’ll be content. But I’ll be very weary of another Smash game and would likely stick with Ultimate.
As for an Ultimate DX, that would require licensing from Konami, Sega, Capcom, Bandai, Square, Microsoft and SNK, as well as any other third party that comes on board in Vol. 2. And Cloud was likely the reason why Everyone is Here almost never happened.
A new game with most characters coming back gets around that problem by not having to get every character back, but a DX would require every third party being on board. I’d love it, particularly if they encorporated DLC into WOL, but I just unfortunately don’t see it happening. I want the complete package, though.
I'm not sure if you realize this, but speculation is fuelled and shaped by evidence. Every theory, every candidate or outcome considered plausible, is supported with evidence of some sort. Evidence that people believe to be meaningful, whether they end up wrong or right. Precedent or statement or attempting to read the terrain. An idea without some evidence is pure spitballing, and those don't gain much traction.
Right now, the argument against mine is using the evidence of the additional slots to drive their case.
So no, this isn't a court of law. But evidence is the resource that powers every halfway grounded speculative conversation about Smash.
It’s why I’m making a distinction between my predictions and my wants. I predict nothing after Vol 2, but I’d love for x, y and z to happen. After I got my dream character I was content, and fell off of speculation. But came back, not wanting to predict what would happen, but throwing out fun ideas.
I spent a long time prior to Ultimate coming out coming up with theories trying to figure out what would happen, caring deeply about gathering what evidence I had at my disposal, shooting down any theory that conflicted with the evidence I gathered. And I was still wrong about Isabelle being an echo, 103 stages being it, Box theory, the fake Grinch leak. I was so wrong, the only thing I got right was Banjo & Kazooie being in due to Verge’s Microsoft rumor, and I was still wrong about them being in the base because I took what Sakurai said at face value that DLC wasn’t being worked on until after the game was completed. I realized speculating to be right was a lot more draining and disheartening than speculating for fun. But I have the luxury of being content, and am not telling anybody else how they should speculate. People do it for different reasons.