Purple
Hi guys!
I will be taking his vote off of Cello_Marl, for the fact this was Guide's vote, not Tom's. If he feels the need to put it back there he can re-vote.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Where'd this come from? I was responding to a question of why should The_Guide go instead of Cello, or vice versa; not why should The_Guide go over anyone else.Tom's notes said:Isuyaru: [...] #260 has a case on The_Guide that is apparently better than anyone else's scum-tells.
I admit I haven't posted much. The biggest problem I'm having is trying to figure out how I want to join a conversation when I see that everything I had originally wanted to post had already been said by someone else.Tom said:Are you lurking?
Can you explain this more?Writer Kupo said:My lynch pool is Guide and Swiss.
What gave you THAT impression?because cello is not happening.
Riddle because he's homed in on one trivial/minor/null/etc thing Cello posted and made a tunnel out of it.@Vult and X1-12: What's your lynch pool right now and why?
My belief on why Guide was mafia sat in posts #112 and #118, second paragraph of the former and the entire post of the latter; along with his long disappearance and eventual coming back on post #237. I was skeptical of his willingness to quicklynch in #112, just like I was skeptical of your earlier two. His, however, seemed more scummy to me because he made a weird play in basically asking Swiss if he wanted to be hammered. I didn't know what to make of it, but I knew the move didn't feel right in the pit of my stomach. The feeling got even worse when he started being really WIFOMy with saying that May had every right to vote for him, and then following it up with noting his own contradiction in that he found Swiss to be completely town. I was really skeptical of him, but I wanted him to defend himself first before making that decision. And he already had a lot of people going after him so I wasn't willing to pressure any further. And he didn't post for quite some time, and when he did he requested to be switched out as he was almost surely to be lynched and claimed that he was playing badly. This still kept me skeptical, because he could have just been a bad scum player and was taking one for the team as he got a (hopefully) better player switched in. I don't know if that's even a viable move, but it seems like a pretty good idea if you don't want to get lynched Day 1 as maf. Thus, I said no to the switch. I knew my play was more ballsy than a man with elephantiasis and risky as ****, but I didn't really care either. He was the player I found scummiest and I didn't want him getting away in the event that I was right.Let me use you as an example, if you don't mind. You said "Guide is most likely to come out mafia". Why do you believe this? It could be argued that you were trying to jump on the most convenient lynch, especially considering that you stated that you did not want to have a replacement for him. From his statements, he's probably not going to come back; if we don't replace him, we lynch him.
Almost all of Swiss' early posts seemed scummy to me when I was reading them while at the airport, so I had my suspicions on him. I can't tell you why they were scummy though. It was just something about the way he worded everything altogether that made me think so. I then read over everything again the next day and I had myself convinced that he was actually town when I was able to sit down and think a bit. I was then at my friend's yesterday and read all of Swiss' posts after he came back and felt that same weird sense of 'scum aura' that I first got when I read through his posts from before he left. Mind you, I was running on very little sleep, which isn't good for me. I looked at his posts today again with a full night's sleep and a nice refreshing shower and came back with a town conclusion again; although this time it's more because I found myself agreeing with a good portion of the things he's said. So I guess I'll say **** it and go with my in-normal-conditions instincts and believe him to be town. For now.Also, what is convincing you that Swiss is a likely mafia?
I don't know why I'm not in the first post either. I keep on forgetting to @mod that one, so thanks for reminding me.Writer Kupo: Why is this guy not in the first post? #149: hot flashes? Girl, then? Anyways, I think they've played before by how they write/type/FoS. If they're a writer, have they competed in WWYP? If not, there is one going right now.
I'm not sure why I said that when looking back. I guess because I figured it'd be absolutely stupid to lynch Riddle just because he claims that he'd buddy May in his very first post. I guess my view on Riddle's post, though, sits in the fact that I know Riddle, so I never questioned his post as anything but a joke. Obviously others don't know him though.Says the bandwagon on Riddle was harmless and for fun and says Riddle was pacifistic, I don't think that's how it went down, it seemed more like Riddle made a weird *** joke about buddying and people took it very seriously, in fact they compared it to Tom-KevinM and asked him question after question before he said it was a joke.
I never promised that I'd type it up. The other stuff is explained (in a way that I'm rather sure most won't like; but I can't really explain it and I'm not even going to try) in my response to Cello when he questioned me about it as well.Says Swiss' bandwagon is more feasible because its more feasible than the Riddle wagon. Also says nothing else. I look forward to what he says about Riddle, defining the "scum aura" on Swiss in actual FACTS. He promises.
Flavor text. Nothing more, nothing less. I tend to include that specific phrase or other phrases like it without really even noticing. There are a lot of them, so I'm not going to try listing them for you."I'll be completely honest," when talking about his relationship with Riddle. Why wouldn't you be?
I went to explain my most possible situation when I finally started to get around to posting, and when I went to explain it in full detail I realized the way I was trying to explain it was going to make me look like an idiot, so I deleted it. And then I just stuck to the stuff that I felt like I could possibly still explain in the current state of mind.#217 comes out and votes Cello_Marl for his aside to Mayling about lining up the lynches, but doesn't even frame it that way. Just talks about WIFOM. That's his (Her?) second post, and has not touched on anything at all related to any players other than Cello-May (with no May), Swiss being scummy but never explained, Riddle being VI.
I just kind of referenced Cello's #228. He says 'if he sees reason', which I changed to 'shown me some sort of light'. Essentially the same thing. The reasoning being that my claim was rather idiotic; something I discovered when I was rethinking my theory and the different theories surrounding it.Backed down on Cello and unvoted immediately, saying "youve shown me some sort of light," what?
Explained to Cello, so just look at that portion.What is your vote of The_Guide based on, in 254? Nothing? "is most liktely to come out mafia," because he is gone? You gave reads but you didn't have any of them up except for X1-12.
I was on a cruise ship for the first three or four days, and then after that I was just lurking in hopes that someone would actually say something that I could hopefully challenge. I don't know how to really scumhunt at all, so I'm going almost entirely off hunches and the way a post makes me feel unless something really just comes out a little too obvious to me; which nothing really did. I got sick of waiting for the biggest scumtells at that current time and decided to go after a post Cello made instead that didn't make me feel too good at all (which I also felt was my biggest chance to make something good of myself; something that didn't happen). Well, that and the fact that Cello's pressuring on others was just confusing me more (I hate reading the same Q&As over and over and over again, so I'd kinda quit paying extreme attention after the first couple throws at each other). This is why my posts have been extremely vague, and I'm sorry for that.You've been an absolute absence the entire game
I had nothing factual (on the in-game front) to say that would draw suspicion away from me or toward someone else, so I just paid attention to why my posts made no sense and hoped it would be enough for now. It was more supposed to be metagaming and documentation, because getting lynched as the weakest link wouldn't surprise me at all. I could easily see how you'd take it as an appeal to emotion though.Kupo, I have to say that half pf what you've posted feels like an appeal to emotion.
You can't and likely won't if I keep posting the way I do. Not going to deny that. Sorry.You said how "I can very easily lose track mid-way or start trying to contradict myself.". Although this may very well be true about your mental state, I personally believe you - how are we ever to differentiate between scum tell contradictions and your mental state confusing you?
currently:@Vult and X1-12: What's your lynch pool right now and why?
Riddle: Early in the Day, he seemed entirely focused on defending himself regarding the buddying Mayling statement. Doesn't really contribute anything else until Cello makes his "feel free to hammer [Swiss]" comment, then remains tunneled on Cello until the Day is almost done. (Bonus points for then saying Cello is being unhelpful to town)X1-12 said:whats your lynch pool Isu?
Tom cannot answer these questions. If anyone thinks they are of any importance (and I for one do, since they were asked of him RIGHT BEFORE The_Guide decided to skip town and never come back), then the only sure way to get any information about them is to lynch Tom and get his alignment. If we do not lynch Tom for this, then we must ignore everything that the Guide has done so far. There is no in-between. (A cop investigation would get this information too, but for that to occur assumes the cop 1) exists, and 2) isn't Riddle, Tom, or X1-12.)Cello_Marl said:...explain to us why you feel [Swiss isn't scum] other than "he didn't play this way before"...if you believe people shouldn't be allowed to "play both sides of the aisle", why are you now permissive of Swiss's behavior, which has allowed him to take no stance on anyone?
This made no sense to me. You thought you were lynching me...why did you say "If you are scum - props"? The "if you are town" makes sense from either a town or scum perspective, in a way. But, why would you be congratulating me for getting myself killed if I'm scum? "You got what you deserve" or "here's what Town thinks of you" or something like that makes sense, but not "props". Frankly, it looks more like a hastily added bit to make it look like you didn't explicitly know I was going to flip town.Swiss said:If you are town - rethink your play style, this game is not just about scum hunting, but helping town in other respects such as not giving off scum tells left right and centre.
If you are scum - props
I have explained MULTIPLE times why I voted you yet said I thought The_Guide was probably more likely to be scum. IF you are scum the threat you pose to town is FAR LARGER than the threat The_Guide would, I do not think you will be on the lynch block again anytime soon and have the best reason for far (imo) for being a survivor.@Swiss: So, you thought you were lynching me...and you did so because mafia would never NK me? How is that a reasonable argument and how does that mean I'd have to be the D1 lynch? Why did you opt to suddenly "lynch" me rather than talk to Guide's replacement, the player slot which you CLAIM TO FIND THE MOST SUSPICIOUS? We weren't at the end of the Day, so "it's better to get a lynch than go No Lynch" isn't a valid argument. Sidenote: I didn't say it would make you a "bad player" (especially since quick-lynching me would be the best you could do), although I did say it would be suicide.
'Cos I've never been less sure of a hammer, so you would have played it well regardless of the fact you got lynched as scum - pay attention plz.This made no sense to me. You thought you were lynching me...why did you say "If you are scum - props"? The "if you are town" makes sense from either a town or scum perspective, in a way. But, why would you be congratulating me for getting myself killed if I'm scum? "You got what you deserve" or "here's what Town thinks of you" or something like that makes sense, but not "props". Frankly, it looks more like a hastily added bit to make it look like you didn't explicitly know I was going to flip town.
"But why did you decide to say that I was probably not scum, especially when it is entirely unreasonable to believe I hadn't left at least an impression upon you?"Also, answer that question in #264, will you? It looks pretty bad when you try to quick hammer like you did without addressing the points against you.
I am entirely aware of the definition of penultimate, and infact had you bothered to apply your definition and actually look at the PENULTIMATE vote score at that point (post #266), you would see and will still be able to see the error to which I was referring - I was simply being polite at the end as it doesn't really matter at this (and at that) point.Should I use smaller words? (Sidenote: "Penultimate" means "next to last", not "last". That would be "ultimate")
As my first re-read was not in total detail, it was in 'decent' detail, thus my opinion is liable to change as I consider more things or 'read in detail sufficient for this game'. I clearly stated this and have no idea how you so spectacularly managed to miss such a simple point.You say Cello is complete scum. You leave for three days. You reread. You say Cello is not scum. You re-reread. You say Cello is scum again, and always looked like scum. Why?
Tom is a much better player than me, especially since a great deal of the very legitimate anti-Guide sentiment was dissipated by him in the space of a single post. Does the same logic for your vote on me now apply to him? He's much more dangerous than me...so why is your vote on me instead of him?Swiss said:IF you are scum the threat you pose to town is FAR LARGER than the threat The_Guide would, I do not think you will be on the lynch block again anytime soon and have the best reason for far (imo) for being a survivor.
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!Swiss said:'Cos I've never been less sure of a hammer, so you would have played it well regardless of the fact you got lynched as scum - pay attention plz.
So, how does this have anything to do with the "if Cello is scum" portion?Swiss said:Alternatively your bad town play would have lead to an early mis-lynch..that isn't good for town mate, especially considering I'd have probably been lynched the next day.
But, "probably isn't scum" does mean "is probably town", and you still haven't explained how you came to that conclusion from your first reread (if you did in fact reread twice. You don't strike me as that diligent). Please give specific points that brought you to the conclusion that I was "probably not scum", then subsequently scum again. "I changed my mind" isn't enough; tell us exactly what it was.Swiss said:At this point I came to the opinion you were simply a player who plays to antagonise, and as such what I previously saw as scummy could merely be you doing precisely what I did at the beginning of the game. Saying someone "Probably isn't scum" DOES NOT EQUATE TO "Cello hasn't done anything scummy to leave a bad impression"..why on earth would ANYONE think that!? Especially someone who is meant to be good at the game.
If it didn't matter, why bother to point it out, especially considering that such unnecessary action is one of the reasons you dislike my play?Swiss said:I was simply being polite at the end as it doesn't really matter at this (and at that) point.
I have already given the group a six day deadline extension being it's Day 1 of a newbie game.Tomorrow, I'll be at work from about 2:30 pm to 10:00 pm EST (7:30 pm to 3:00 am for X1-12), and 7:30 am to 4:00 pm the next morning (12:30 pm to 9:00 pm in the UK), leaving only 4 hours for me to really be here after work. Further, in addition to that, my father will be visiting for four days starting tomorrow, so I'd rather spend time with him than here.
While it would be best if Swiss or Tom were to be lynched tonight or early tomorrow, we may also want to use our time extension. That way, Tom can get into the groove of the game so he can't claim time problems for getting into the game.
@Mod: Request: Deadline Extension
Unvote Vote Swiss
Swiss is the most likely lynch, so let's just go with that.
If anything, the fact that I started to be less suspicious of him is proof that my fears were well founded.Tom said:Also, "You were afraid that town would forget about Swiss. Have you forgotten about him, according to that definition?"
This is a newbie game. The point of his skimming was made by my comment, and so I moved on to my secondary objective as an IC; instructing newbie players in how to play. (although, personally, I think it should be the primary objective)Tom said:Why does X1-12 have to stop skimming as scum?
I'm going to add a little more to this. Polling the group, we can easily see that Riddle and X1-12 find Tom to be a far more competent player than me, after literally one post. He also managed to create a Writer Kupo kill sentiment where none existed before...while simultaneously convincing Writer Kupo to take his vote off of him! That's some strong influence...and the sign of a powerful player. He's definitely got me beat in the experience department, as he can be measured in years whereas I had only heard of mafia, much less played, merely months ago. See how many times you find "Tom is awesome" on these forums, compared to my literally being put on "ignore" during a game.Cello_Marl said:Tom is a much better player than me...He's much more dangerous than me...so why is your vote on me instead of him?
'Alive' - Now you mention it I am vaguely aware of the role name, but have no idea what it is.@Swiss: Just to be sure, when you say "survivor", do you mean "an alive player" or the role?
It wasn't an unnecessary action - I felt that town knowing who you voted was useful, and still do. Turns out he just forgot to remove your name and didn't have the dollar sign there, so it can be figured out, but is misleading.If it didn't matter, why bother to point it out, especially considering that such unnecessary action is one of the reasons you dislike my play?
You keep saying Cello is asking irrelevant questions but that is not the case at all. In fact, I see many of the people on Cello's wagon saying it's cause his questions are useless, pointless, etc. But are you sure you just don't want to answer them? I don't understand how a question such as "Why did you change your thinking; nothing has changed" is pointless, which is a question Cello asked can be boiled down to.It's not him being rude I have a problem with, it's been his irrelevant questioning and ignoring answers.
What happened to Cello?My lynch pool is Guide and Swiss.
Your main targets were The Guide and Swiss but you haven't ever voted these two, have you? Yet you voted cello? Why?Writer Kupo said:Sorry this post took a while. The way Cello posts kinda really gets under your blood; even when it's simple questions. Just something about it. Anyway, I was only questioning you, Cello, because my main two targets for lynch at the time were Guide and Swiss; the former of which wasn't posting and the latter of which was V/LA. I guess you'd call it a first attempt to make some sort of feasible argument against something; which obviously didn't work out at all.
Widdle Riddle, I think you have what it takes to be a great player. However, something I noticed about you is you really try to play by the book.Things I would like changed:
1) No buddying
2) EXPLAIN why things are scummy
3) No ad hominem defenses
4) Don't post walls of text, they don't help town imo. Conciseness is good, get to the point.
This was really bad to sad. :I Dislike dislike.Will you PLEASE STOP asking the most pointless and ******** questions. I may have to hammer you by default, imo you damage the town process far too much.
#70 was my thoughts before doing a re-read.Mayling: Votes Riddle for "buddying her." I don't understand her motives in #70. In #72 she distances herself from Riddle's buddying, disproving any real reason for his attitude (besides that Riddle is a pre-adolescent boy and Mayling is a chibikawaiigirl). #93 when did that happen? #111-112 votes The_Guide for being contradictory. #167: thinks X1-12 is a good play, Swiss is town but not cooperating, likes Vult.
Cello_marl said:Hi, Vult! Nice of you to join us. Anyone else want on? We have cookies.
I also remember Cello saying something along the lines of "I'm used to Vult asking a lot of questions but he doesn't seem to be doing that a lot." I can't ifnd the post right now tho.Cello_marl said:@Vult: Talk about Isuyaru. Or question him. Either is fine.
I don't think saying I like something someone said equates to liking /them./Maymay said:I like what Vult said about Riddle, although it doesn't just apply to Riddle but pretty much everyone voting Cello sans Swiss, whose vote reeks majorly of a towny OMGUS in the way the argument has formed and played out.
Not everything. You have a terrible habit of evading the most important ones.Swiss said:I've explained pretty much EVERYTHING that you have asked me.
I've already explained my thoughts on Swiss, quite clearly. What did you hope to accomplish by asking me to vote for him?Kupo, Riddle, Isuyaru, Mayling, X1-12, and Vult, put your votes on Swiss, and if you won't, then tell me why.
Swiss is the most likely lynch, so let's just go with that.
Questions like "Why did you specifically challenge me to point out why Isuyaru wasn't scum, if pressuring Isuyaru was your goal? More to the point, why didn't you continue to pressure Isuyaru to talk until you got the information that you needed regardless of what anyone else may have said, since you knew you'd receive flak for your actions? Yes, I've asked this before, but I never got an answer."You keep saying Cello is asking irrelevant questions but that is not the case at all. In fact, I see many of the people on Cello's wagon saying it's cause his questions are useless, pointless, etc. But are you sure you just don't want to answer them? I don't understand how a question such as "Why did you change your thinking; nothing has changed" is pointless, which is a question Cello asked can be boiled down to.
/
When I first read this I thought that was quite a townie thing to say (open to doubt etc).I still am really disturbed by Swiss's play, but I'm still open to some room for doubt, if he actually bothers to answer/respond to my questions (if you really are town, *****ing and moaning about being pursued is a ****ty way to deal with it. Just answer questions truthfully). Right now, I'm interested in X1 as well as Guide.
At one point, I thought X1-12 and Guide were the scum. That means I thought you weren't (even though I still had suspicions). If that isn't open to doubt, I don't know what is.Swiss said:However you have previously admitted being "single minded if not wishy washy" about the whole thing and I am sure (though I can't remember ehere) you admitted that you were tunneling me. How open do doubt were you really? Why pretend you were more open than you truly were? Imo another case of you lying. Coupled with the fact you were complaining I wasn't answering my questions after I stated I had LEFT FOR THE FESTIVAL implied you were simply trying to poison people's tastes against me.
So, there were legitimate cases? "Cases" being the operative word. There was the one on Guide, but who else was there? You only pursued me and Guide...if there was any other legitimate case, who was it and why didn't you pursue it?Swiss said:Reading your case on X1-12 really made me concerned, you were pushing it beyond all reasonable limits, and while I appreciate that as a player you probably push like this a lot, I do not see why you tried to make a case out of the guy not being familiar with the game (i.e. a BS case) when there were LEGITIMATE cases out there to be pursued.
Well hopefully the answer above was finally sufficient.@Swiss: Whenever you've "answered" the most important questions, you've almost always just said it was a "general feel" whenever I've asked for specifics, or flat out ignored portions of the question, such as when I asked why we should believe you were willing to read close to 300 posts (and very large ones at that) TWICE in three hours. (I believe you are lying about doing that, not just because it's you specifically, but because it's extremely unreasonable in general)
I said it seemed townie. Doesn't mean the dude is 100% town in my book.Ah, but you say that you are no longer suspicious of Tom due to his wonderful post. What did he say that refuted the points against The_Guide? Be specific, preferably by citing all of the problems that you had with The_Guide and then the point Tom made that made it magically go away.
I don't re-read loads, but I've had to do a fair bit wrt your questions.Do you consistently reread the thread? Why did you reread the whole thread twice in the space of 3 hours? How is that even reasonable, and as such, why should we believe that you did? Also, why did you try to hammer me before you answered my questions in #264? Did you feel you didn't have to explain yourself, and if so, why were you "keeping your cards close to your chest"?
No, I stated I was LA for one day before I was finally gone. I clearly stated this so I have no idea what you're on about.Back @Swiss:
As far as your V/LA is concerned, you'd already claimed you were going to leave then come back once. Why should I have thought the second time would be any different? More importantly, if I have a point to make, I will make it. I'm not going to let people believe I was fine with your lack of response for three days when I was not. Finally, how does attacking your position have anything to do with "simply" poisoning your credibility? It's directly relevant to this game, not an attack on your capabilities.
Loads of people had cases on them, the Riddle malarkie, The_Guide points, you, me (ofc we have to exclude those)..probably others, even if I'm wrong here and there weren't cases out there or waiting to be made (pretty sure there were), then my point still stands, albeit to a lesser degree.So, there were legitimate cases? "Cases" being the operative word. There was the one on Guide, but who else was there? You only pursued me and Guide...if there was any other legitimate case, who was it and why didn't you pursue it?
I'm actually willing to say the same, with the obvious name swap occurring.If for some reason I get lynched, Tom and Swiss better be next.
Swiss said:Cello, out of interest, suppose I were to be lynched and flip town, what would your analysis of this whole play be?
@X1-12: There is new material in play. You should consider it. Also, it was a clarion call for the lynch, which you should have realized considering you wanted to get the lynch in before the last day.
Here is where you said you reread, and where you say you were worried about me.Swiss said:I read it once in detail, and I read THE PARTS I HAD MISSED WHILE V/LA. Admittedly I might not have specified that, but I think I did.
How and when, then, did you change your mind about me? It had to have been after you came back, but you claim it wasn't.Swiss said:Re-read.
What I really, really don't like is the vehemence with which Cello has pushed this lynch. I also do not like the 'play well' pressure Cello tried to put on me to not lynch him. I am concerned Cello could be scum diverting the game in whichever way he pleases and as such, although I am more confident of The_Guide being scum, I feel the risk of Cello being scum is too great to the future gain of town.
What's your reasoning for these? Particularly the Tom/Swiss one.Mayling said:I said I was calling a The_Tom/Kupo team possibly. The_Tom/Swiss. Hm. Maybe.