Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Exactly. Plenty of other fighting games have seperate cloned versions of characters (and some not so cloned) on their Rosters. Why is it a "no-no" for Smash?Well Tekken had Jin & Devil Jin so why not?
Well, Sakurai was considering him for Brawl more than Toad, Paper Mario, Bowser Jr., Geno, or Waluigi.I really don't see any reason to treat Dr. Mario as a separate entity.
And a new boomerang... And bombs that function differently... And a spin attack that functions differently... And arrows that function differently... And a single slash for Usmash... And a new bair... And a new nair... And a new fair... And a fair that functions differently... And iirc different grabsI would have kept Dr. Mario and Pichu. Toon Link is simply Young Link with a new design.
Its because Smash has so many characters that they can use other than Clone versions of existing characters.Exactly. Plenty of other fighting games have seperate cloned versions of characters (and some not so cloned) on their Rosters. Why is it a "no-no" for Smash?
Especially considering Dr. Mario was planned for Brawl.
Exactly. There is already effort given to make him different from Mario as compared to Overalls Wario being the exact same as Biker Wario, so wouldn't it better to go the extra centimeter and give him his own spot?Its funny how so many people want Dr. Mario to come back as a costume, and for this costume to have the same stats and abilities (throw pills and electricity) as he did in Melee, but simply don't want him have his face having a spot on the character selection screen.
I still prefer a newcomer Mario series character over a veteran, who's basically just an outfit swap of someone who is already in the game. Bowser Jr. and Toad pretty much need that 5th spot more than Dr. Mario.Well, Sakurai was considering him for Brawl more than Toad, Paper Mario, Bowser Jr., Geno, or Waluigi.![]()
However, he was the least popular newcomer in Melee among casuals, second only to Pichu, due to him not being differentiated enough from regular Mario.
Still, despite this, he was seriously considered for Brawl.
I still think Doc would be good because he would at least represent one of Nintendo's biggest puzzle franchises.
Its funny how so many people want Dr. Mario to come back as a costume, and for this costume to have the same stats and abilities (throw pills and electricity) as he did in Melee, but simply don't want him have his face having a spot on the character selection screen.
Why waste a slot on a character who is merely an alternate version or clone of said character when you could have had a completely original and unique character?Exactly. Plenty of other fighting games have seperate cloned versions of characters (and some not so cloned) on their Rosters. Why is it a "no-no" for Smash?
Especially considering Dr. Mario was planned for Brawl.
Sakurai disagreed with this... twice.Bowser Jr. and Toad pretty much need that 5th spot more than Dr. Mario.
Who says they have to be clones? They may share many moves, but they play quite differently. The only clone I can think of that might play fairly similar is Pichu at best.Its because Smash has so many characters that they can use other than Clone versions of existing characters.
Yeah the villain pretty much blackmailed Zoroark into doing doing bad deeds because she thought that Zorua was being held hostage but it ended up escaping they end up being reunited in the end though.Isn't Zoroark forced to be the "bad guy" of its movie because its baby Zorua is TAKEN HOSTAGE or something? Could be a plot point in the story mode. Then in multiplayer Zorua could be a Pokeball as GoldenYusomething suggested.
At least Paper Mario got a trophy.Well, Sakurai was considering him for Brawl more than Toad, Paper Mario, Bowser Jr., Geno, or Waluigi.![]()
However, he was the least popular newcomer in Melee among casuals, second only to Pichu, due to him not being differentiated enough from regular Mario.
Still, despite this, he was seriously considered for Brawl.
I still think Doc would be good because he would at least represent one of Nintendo's biggest puzzle franchises.
Its funny how so many people want Dr. Mario to come back as a costume, and for this costume to have the same stats and abilities (throw pills and electricity) as he did in Melee, but simply don't want him have his face having a spot on the character selection screen.
The problem is, you take things to the extreme.Why waste a slot on a character who is merely an alternate version or clone of said character when you could have had a completely original and unique character?
I don't think Smash would sell very well if it had Mario, Dr. Mario, Metal Mario, Tanooki Mario, Link, Young Link, Toon Link, Dark Link, Samus, Zero Suit Samus, Dark Samus, Fusion Suit Samus, Kirby, Yarn Kirby, Pikachu, Pichu, Raichu, etc.
I was kind of thinking that Zoroark's debut would have it disguise itself as someone to fool its enemies.Isn't Zoroark forced to be the "bad guy" of its movie because its baby Zorua is TAKEN HOSTAGE or something? Could be a plot point in the story mode. Then in multiplayer Zorua could be a Pokeball as GoldenYusomething suggested.
The basic reason why they prefer doing clones over making all characters unique is because it can save you a lot of time, yet won't much hinder the chances for adding some new character. (We got Ganondorf by this way)Why waste a slot on a character who is merely an alternate version or clone of said character when you could have had a completely original and unique character?
I don't think Smash would sell very well if it had Mario, Dr. Mario, Metal Mario, Tanooki Mario, Link, Young Link, Toon Link, Dark Link, Samus, Zero Suit Samus, Dark Samus, Fusion Suit Samus, Kirby, Yarn Kirby, Pikachu, Pichu, Raichu, etc.
I did not, but I would love to see it.Sakurai disagreed with this... twice.
Golden: Did you see that unique moveset I made for Dr. Mario?
I never said he had the same properties. They're just the same person, not same character.@HyperFalcon: Dr. Mario has different properties as well. There's a reason he's higher on the Tier list than Mario. If they were the same, they would be equal Tiers.
Dr. Mario moveset:I did not, but I would love to see it.![]()
Perhaps it could work for Zorua, but I think Zoroark should use a deadly attack on a player once he is done with Illusion. I suggested Faint Attack for one.I thought of a Poke Ball idea for Zorua (or Zoroark if she happens to not be playable)
They come out as another Poke Ball summon and do the motions that the summon would normally do.
However...there are no hurt boxes that come from them. (For example, if Zorua/Zoroark comes out as Groudon, touching "Groudon" won't cause any sort of damage or knockback.)
After the usual motions are finished, the fake Pokemon will reveal themself as Zorua/Zoroark, laugh at the players for trolling them, then disappear.
I applaud this.I think it is unfair for the new characters to be kept out of Smash because of old characters. At least the old characters have been given a chance to be playable in Smash... it is unfair to deny the new characters any chance of being playable in Smash because the old characters are in the way. In order for a roster from becoming stagnant, new characters are needed to replace old characters. Fighting games do that all the time. Same with Mario Kart. Fans of old characters will always demand their return... but they are also likely to become fans of new characters... and then what? They will also want both old and new characters to come back in future games all the while becoming fans of newer characters. After all, it is a sequel, not an expansion.
I like this idea. I'm not a big fan of the anime style, but most of the roster's characters should work reasonably well for such a style and it gives us a new, unique unlockable.Hey guys. just wondering, what if the official art for SSB4 would be done by artists behind KI Uprising's art?
SSB4 then has high-quality anime-style (?) art around it, drawn in same way as for Uprising depicting Pit and his use of weapons, other characters like Palutena, Medusa, bosses, Magnus and like.
You could unlock more art by collecting huger pics than stickers which would be more rare. They can be then seen in the separate "Gallery Mode."
The art would depict characters and their abilities, stages, assist trophies, (maybe) items. Battle scenes, even artists' personally made scenes which maybe could characters doing else than fighting together, etc.
I think it would be appealing and all the characters would look great. (personally)
Also it wouldn't be so lazily recycled trophy-art like Brawl did with Dojo!!
Your thoughts on this?
While there's a subject regarding Adventure Mode, I might as well input my cast positions...
I do like the idea behind these Adventure Mode-centric rosters. I'll have to make one myself eventually.Well, I guess I'll put my roster on here......
Yes, that's how we got Ganondorf... and look how most fans reacted. They want Ganondorf to be Ganondorf, not Captain Falcon.The basic reason why they prefer doing clones over making all characters unique is because it can save you a lot of time, yet won't much hinder the chances for adding some new character. (We got Ganondorf by this way)
Doing ground-up original characters is damn hard and takes time to them, so they can't afford to make all characters unique: hence why we have clones.
So do I. Logic ftw.I applaud this.
I think the fact that Sakurai said from the start that there would be cuts, like he KNEW there were characters that just shouldn't be there, as well as him saying that he tried to make each character feel like an individual WOULD SEEM TO ME like he doesn't like the idea of clones anyway. Wolf and Lucas are the closest thing we have to clones in Brawl that weren't carried over from Melee, and really they're different enough.Yes, that's how we got Ganondorf... and look how most fans reacted. They want Ganondorf to be Ganondorf, not Captain Falcon.
And making clones is a lazy way to build a roster... I don't want 10 newcomers for SSB4 where they all happen to be clones or variations of existing characters. I want completely original and unique characters... newcomers that look nothing alike the veterans AND have distinct specials.
I don't want a shorter, faster, weaker Bowser (Bowser Jr.) or a stronger, heavier, bigger Bowser (Dry Bowser) or a stronger, slower, heavier Samus (Dark Samus)... the worst offender would probably be Toon Sheik... did Sakurai really need to resort to making up BS like that just to make the roster bigger? He should have considered Tetra instead. Thank god that didn't happen... and I hope it stays that way.
Do you play as Ganondorf?Yes, that's how we got Ganondorf... and look how most fans reacted. They want Ganondorf to be Ganondorf, not Captain Falcon.
Chaotix Recital.Team Chatoix would be better as AT's then Silver
I occasionally play as Ganondorf, and I hate his Falcon-clone moveset.Do you play as Ganondorf?
Do you like how Bowser Plays?