Oasis_S
Smash Legend
I'm sure picking Zoroark on the character select screen would be a pretty big RED FLAG for your friends that you may have picked Zoroark.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah that could work, but if you transform into a character you aren't good with , you'd be screwed out of your first lifeTrue. Well if not who you're playing against then perhaps another random character from the roster? That'd add an element of surprise, for both players.
Oh, then I better say the first time I watched it was when it was released in Japan. Because as soon as it came out (When he was introduced), I agreed for him to be on the next SSB. Funny thing is I didn't even know what Brawl was then (I think. That was years ago @_@).Okay, but to everyone else he was pretty DURN obvious.
Did you make a Talisman reference earlier?
Ahhh thanks, okay. I'm glad you mean abs then. LOLAbs. I got the shape, and the first two, but that's it.
.
I was led to believe sonic was in Melee. All I had to do was beat Jigglypuff's classic mode on the hardest setting with one life and using no continues. Needless to say I spent weeks trying and when I succeded, I WAS PISSED AS HELL BECAUSE THERE WAS NO SAWNIIIKU -_________-I was also led to believe that King Dedede was an unlockable character in Melee.
I KNOW he wasn't added to the game. But THERE WAS a third party not added because of time/legal (forget which) constraints. I think it was LEGAL constraints that weren't resolved IN TIME. Yes. Thats what it was.Just ask any hacker on this forum if it's true.
The only Brawl rumor I can see still holding some weight is GENO partially programmed/unlockable. Which I DO BELIEVE he could have been the third character who wasn't added in time.
but but you saidI KNOW he wasn't added to the game.
So, HACKERS DON'T KNOW **** about this. Unless they used the internet.
so it makes sense to sayGENO partially programmed/unlockable.
Just ask any hacker on this forum if it's true.
What to do with our time instead of speculating.Who would that leave us to speculate about though? I'd be set whoever they add after that
Go to the inevitable ashley thread and spam how they are pedo's?What to do with our time instead of speculating.
You're mom has more important charactersI would hate to see Geno in Smash since there are more important characters to Nintendo.
Which Ashley?Go to the inevitable ashley thread and spam how they are pedo's?
Nice, I receive an insult for an opinion. >_<You're mom has more important characters
This is... Beautiful :')And behold, the warrior of the heavens came to the mushroom kingdom and took the most humblest of forms; that of a simple (By simple I mean more advanced than any toy I've ever seen, it had guns and a cannon strong enough to knock out mario while it was still small) wooden doll.
He, our savior, vanquished the evil perverted of creations - the polluter of worlds: Smithy. With his last words, he promised he would return when the world needed him.
'Till this day, we await the return of our savior so our eternal souls may rise to the star road.
Geno be praised
I have no idea who option 1 is.Which Ashley?
![]()
![]()
Ahhh, pity I wasn't around during that time, but there's always Smash 4.I have no idea who option 1 is.
It was actually a joke based on what we actually did do during the days of Brawl's development.
Good times
My problem is that you called him a Nintendo character when he's not one. He's a Square-Enix character and they have complete control over him. He's pure Third Party. I don't think he's nearly as appealing as others, but he definitely would be a great choice in general. I'm not comparing him to other characters, though. I've always liked him and Mallow. They were great in Super Mario RPG.Nice, I receive an insult for an opinion. >_<
I understand he has fighting potentials and he has his fanbase, but I just don't get the appeal of this character over so many
He's a Mario character first, in my eyes. And always will be, regardless of legal BSMy problem is that you called him a Nintendo character when he's not one. He's a Square-Enix character and they have complete control over him. He's pure Third Party. I don't think he's nearly as appealing as others, but he definitely would be a great choice in general. I'm not comparing him to other characters, though. I've always liked him and Mallow. They were great in Super Mario RPG.
Well, technically speaking, he is a Mario character... just not owned by Nintendo.He's a Mario character first, in my eyes. And always will be, regardless of legal BS
That reminds me. Smashboards should REALLY take a page from SRK and keep all character discussion to strictly confirmed characters. All the unconfirmed stuff should go into a speculation thread.Go to the inevitable ashley thread and spam how they are pedo's?
Of course he's a Mario character, but he's not a Nintendo one. Likewise, that legal BS is why he didn't appear in Brawl.He's a Mario character first, in my eyes. And always will be, regardless of legal BS
I think we'll need a Geno and Ridley thread, or else the forum is going to have spam like crazy in unrelated threadsThat reminds me. Smashboards should REALLY take a page from SRK and keep all character discussion to strictly confirmed characters. All the unconfirmed stuff should go into a speculation thread.
I wasn't referring Geno as a Nintendo character. I meant to state that there are Nintendo characters that should get in before him, even though he is 3rd Party. Sorry for the error.My problem is that you called him a Nintendo character when he's not one. He's a Square-Enix character and they have complete control over him. He's pure Third Party. I don't think he's nearly as appealing as others, but he definitely would be a great choice in general. I'm not comparing him to other characters, though. I've always liked him and Mallow. They were great in Super Mario RPG.
Okay.I wasn't referring Geno as a Nintendo character. I meant to state that there are Nintendo characters that should get in before him, even though he is 3rd Party. Sorry for the error.
To be fair, they weren't playable in an rpg, and has less characterization. I can understand why they hype him.Most of the times, I see people suggest him over Toad & Bowser Jr for a new Mario rep. In my opinion it just doesn't seem like a logical choice since he has only appeared in 2 games while the other 2 have appeared in numerous games, especially Toad.
Fair enough. Personally, I don't think there are enough supporters. Would help get him in already.He seems overrated as a Smash candidate, but that is just my opinion though.
Except Geno is an incredibly unique and interesting character. Toad may be much MUCH more recognizable, but every single moveset I've seen for him is REALLY grabbing at straws. Bowser Jr. may be more "important" than Geno, but once again, he really was only unique when he had his paintbrush. Geno was the face of one of the most popular SNES games. An entire generations of Nintendo fans love him and he would be incredibly unique AND cool. Number of games don't mean **** as far as I'm concerned. Waluigi has been in WAY more games. Should we include him also? (Rhetorical question. The correct answer is no.)I wasn't referring Geno as a Nintendo character. I meant to state that there are Nintendo characters that should get in before him, even though he is 3rd Party. Sorry for the error.
Most of the times, I see people suggest him over Toad & Bowser Jr for a new Mario rep. In my opinion it just doesn't seem like a logical choice since he has only appeared in 2 games while the other 2 have appeared in numerous games, especially Toad.
He seems overrated as a Smash candidate, but that is just my opinion though.