StarBot
Smash Lord
Oh boy here we go once more...Take that, Melee fanboys.![]()
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Oh boy here we go once more...Take that, Melee fanboys.![]()
Take your own advice. Fail fish.I'm sure everyone cares.
FailFish
It's limited to which cast can use certain parts of the tech or not. There are two corners on final d stages. Sakurai's vision of competetive online in for glory sucks big time. In the video it's a person using Mario on Battlefield. You'll never see battlefield online in for glory.Why so? O.o
Its funny cause at first it was like: Yes some marth and DK buff! saw Diddy, we're doomed. Playing sm4sh just amazing, every week, new technology.Lol, again a Diddy Kong buff.
Is that a joke?
Can you give any proof that the exploit was given a name by the development team or that it was intended?What you're saying is factually false. Wavedashing was in the game, given a name by the development team, and has been recognized as a legit thing that turned into more than it was expected to be.
If you are saying it was 'never intended' you are wrong. End of story.
Please stop having this argument. Thanks.
*retracted statement*Sakurai came to an impasse, and that means he was compelled to choose. To choose to do nothing is to allow its existence, and therefore to intend its presence in the game. No matter what duress one is placed under one must accept all inevitable consequences of the actions insofar as they know.
It is logically necessary, for when Sakurai chose to 'do nothing' he chose to deliberately leave it in the game, therefore to intend its existence, regardless of any possible dislike he had of it. Therefore, it, at some point, was intended.
To say otherwise is implicitly contradictory, therefore false.
This isn't an argument about wavedashing, this is simple logic, the principles of causation and contradiction, and praxeology.
Nobody 'does nothing' when they choose to 'do nothing' in the sense that by choosing they accept all the consequences they know will logically come from their 'inaction' (which is really action).
TL;DRSakurai came to an impasse, and that means he was compelled to choose. To choose to do nothing is to allow its existence, and therefore to intend its presence in the game. No matter what duress one is placed under one must accept all inevitable consequences of the actions insofar as they know.
It is logically necessary, for when Sakurai chose to 'do nothing' he chose to deliberately leave it in the game, therefore to intend its existence, regardless of any possible dislike he had of it. Therefore, it, at some point, was intended.
To say otherwise is implicitly contradictory, therefore false.
This isn't an argument about wavedashing, this is simple logic, the principles of causation and contradiction, and praxeology.
Nobody 'does nothing' when they choose to 'do nothing' in the sense that by choosing they accept all the consequences they know will logically come from their 'inaction' (which is really action).
The event that Sakurai was aware of the existence of wavedashing during development and the statement that wavedashing was an exploit that was never intended to be in the game are not mutually exclusive, contrary to what you claim.Sakurai came to an impasse, and that means he was compelled to choose. To choose to do nothing is to allow its existence, and therefore to intend its presence in the game. No matter what duress one is placed under one must accept all inevitable consequences of the actions insofar as they know.
It is logically necessary, for when Sakurai chose to 'do nothing' he chose to deliberately leave it in the game, therefore to intend its existence, regardless of any possible dislike he had of it. Therefore, it, at some point, was intended.
To say otherwise is implicitly contradictory, therefore false.
This isn't an argument about wavedashing, this is simple logic, the principles of causation and contradiction, and praxeology.
Nobody 'does nothing' when they choose to 'do nothing' in the sense that by choosing they accept all the consequences they know will logically come from their 'inaction' (which is really action).
I thought it was clear enough. I'm not trying to prove anything other than it's logically impossible to call it that stuff.I can smell the pretentiousness from this post. It's like you're trying hard to prove you're intelligent. You know you can get a point across in layman's terms.
Yet I have proven them to be so.The event that Sakurai was aware of the existence of wavedashing during development and the statement that wavedashing was an exploit that was never intended to be in the game are not mutually exclusive, contrary to what you claim.
I see you know what advice looks like.Take your own advice. Fail fish.
Choosing to let something exist doesn't mean that you intended it to exist in the first place. You're basically relying on a false dichotomy in order to support your argument. Also, your previous post had unnecessary verbiage.Look, we agree that Sakurai deliberately chose to leave it in, correct? Do we also agree that choosing to let something exist means that one intends to let it exist?
You seem to have ignored the second part:Choosing to let something exist doesn't mean that you intended it to exist in the first place. You're basically relying on a false dichotomy in order to support your argument. Also, your previous post had unnecessary verbiage.
Edit: I was wrong when I said "which we have no indication of".Then, we must agree that Sakurai intended for its existence at some point. Now, if you mean before that point or at some vague time after that point (which we have no indication of) where he regretted letting it exist, then you're right, but you use the word 'never'.
OH NO MY BOY JAEDRIK </3I thought it was clear enough. I'm not trying to prove anything other than it's logically impossible to call it that stuff.
Also Krymson it's me, bro, Jaedrik, I thought we loved eachother
Yet I have proven them to be so.
Look, we agree that Sakurai deliberately chose to leave it in, correct? Do we also agree that choosing to let something exist means that one intends to let it exist? Then, we must agree that Sakurai intended for its existence at some point. Now, if you mean before that point or at some vague time after that point (which we have no indication of) where he regretted letting it exist, then you're right, but you use the word 'never'.
Then, if we agree on all that, can we agree that a developer intended mechanic means that it's not an exploit? Then it's not an exploit.
NO IT'S OK DON'T FEEL BADOH NO MY BOY JAEDRIK </3
DUDE I FEEL SO BAD
What was the original name? Just curious.What you're saying is factually false. Wavedashing was in the game, given a name by the development team, and has been recognized as a legit thing that turned into more than it was expected to be.
If you are saying it was 'never intended' you are wrong. End of story.
Please stop having this argument. Thanks.
Yea it acctually is very punishable don't know why everyone is going crazy about itLooks extremely punishable. Oh let me just slide into my enemy. Surely they wont expect an attack or anything.
That is only what you supposed and there isn't any proof that Sakurai intended for wavedashing to be in the game at any point.You seem to have ignored the second part: Edit: I was wrong when I said "which we have no indication of".
Nothing wrong with casual play, reallyThis is the most Casual thing I've ever read on the entirety of SmashBoards.
But, I do have proof. It's a logical proof.That is only what you supposed and there isn't any proof that Sakurai intended for wavedashing to be in the game at any point.
100% true, 100% not trolling. Oh ok.I hate wavedashing. I think it's stupid to rely on a glitch to move around. Fight like a man, I say.
you're confusing intent with knowledge. He never intended for it to be in the game, he discovered it. Subsequently, he ignored it and likely never gave it a second thought until people started to get out of control with it. You are assuming that he spent a lot of time thinking about what to do with wavedashing when really what he probably did was see it and then say "oh, thats weird" and moved on. In order for your "logical proof" to be accurate, Sakurai would have had to have contemplated the future of wavedashing heavily. Since we don't know exactly what he thought about it and how he considered dealing with it, we have to speculate. Speculation and logical proofs ARE mutually exclusive.But, I do have proof. It's a logical proof.
The proof is that, since it is necessary that someone intends for their effects to come to pass when they choose some action, and since we know that Sakurai chose to keep wavedashing while Melee was being developed, he intended for wavedashing to continue its existence in the game since its existence is necessary with 'keeping' it. If it was not kept it would not exist. Therefore, there MUST be SOME point at which Sakurai intended for it to be in the game, otherwise it would not have been kept, thus it would not be in the game. But, we know that it is in the game, and we KNOW that Sakurai chose to keep it, therefore he INTENDED it to be KEPT, and thus exist in the final version.
Edit: It's like asking for ice cream from an ice cream truck and then getting mad when you get ice cream, claiming you didn't intend to get ice cream.
Okay is it just me, or was that one of the best remixes ever!?
http://smashboards.com/threads/disp...-intervew-wavedashing-was-intentional.162416/you're confusing intent with knowledge. He never intended for it to be in the game, he discovered it. Subsequently, he ignored it and likely never gave it a second thought until people started to get out of control with it. You are assuming that he spent a lot of time thinking about what to do with wavedashing when really what he probably did was see it and then say "oh, thats weird" and moved on. In order for your "logical proof" to be accurate, Sakurai would have had to have contemplated the future of wavedashing heavily. Since we don't know exactly what he thought about it and how he considered dealing with it, we have to speculate. Speculation and logical proofs ARE mutually exclusive.
Also, your metaphor does not work. If anything its more like being given free ice cream and then throwing it away, and then being like, "Man, i wish i never had that ice cream at all"
Back to the video, this tech is pretty cool and didnt take me very long to figure out once i started practicing.
It even has its own name in the code. "Land Fall Special'.Sakurai said:Of course, we noticed that you could do that during the development period.
trueThis is the most Casual thing I've ever read on the entirety of SmashBoards.
Oh, you right, my bad doe.@Jaedrik "landfallspecial" is the name for the helpless state that certain moves put characters in.
I'd say it's beyond reasonable doubt that the question was accurately translated, and that Sakurai was not dodging the question as many interpretations have it, but rather that his response in the affirmative (hence why the "Of course" has a comma directly after it, separating it and the clause where he notes their noticing of it) signals that they intentionally left it in. Now, if there was no comma there it'd be clear as day that he meant that it's obvious they knew about it. But, since there is one there, and since it's safe to say that he's not simply avoiding the question, the only real alternative is that he is affirming that it's obvious they left it in, then adding that choice to leave it in or not was brought about since it's so hard to miss.Also, as I said before, just because Sakurai noticed wavedashing does not mean that he intended for it to be in the game. The title of the thread that you quoted is erroneous.