Saito
Pranked!
Someone had a Pichu party without me?
How dare you.
How dare you.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
ApparentlyBy the way, found that post by Cmart I was thinking of.
It was only 9 pages back, that's quite the short memory you got there Arctic![]()
This is a discussion thread man. You are free to share any ideas you have. Just don't let the times when you have no ideas to offer be a down-vote for that character. Down-votes should be reserved for characters you strongly dislike to the point it ruins your experience with the game.Alright, I edited my post of downvotes since I shouldn't have put the worries of the PMBR in my own judgment. Also I didn't really think of a good reason to down vote Ray. But in my defense I was up until 4, so my train of thought was probably not where it usually was. I feel as though apologies are needed. I'll leave the brainstorming for character moves to myself.
From a perspective that values matchup learnability, I want PMBR to be as conservative as possible with new characters. That's why I only voted for two and a half, and downvoted a slew of others.Exactly. Serious guys, if all of these characters would ruin P:M for you, how do you guys ever enjoy anything? Here are the rules again real quick just to give you guys a refresher.
While it does seem wise to be as conservative with the choices as much as possible, I think it's important to think of the factors that come into play when trying to do these new characters. That's why so far our new characters have been characters we've had in previous installments. The material was already there, and it just had to be adjusted.From a perspective that values matchup learnability, I want PMBR to be as conservative as possible with new characters. That's why I only voted for two and a half, and downvoted a slew of others.
More upvotes may follow, I just don't feel that strongly about them right now.
While that's true, you're not expected to make that judgment for them. This poll is only to show what people want, and they can use that how they wish. When you start to try interpret what they want, then you mess that up.From a perspective that values matchup learnability, I want PMBR to be as conservative as possible with new characters. That's why I only voted for two and a half, and downvoted a slew of others.
More upvotes may follow, I just don't feel that strongly about them right now.
Bear in mind that if you're going to downvote anyone, you have to provide reasonable explanations as to why.Wassup I'm new!
I'd like to downvote Toad, Waluigi, Pichu, Knuckles and Krystal.
Impossible. Pichu's frame, hitboxes, and hurtboxes do not match Pikachu's. This has been brought up over a million times over the duration of this thread.Oh ok. Pichu should just be a costume.
I can somewhat understand the part about being a Sonic clone (even though I doubt they would share anything beyond Spin-Dash), but a Meta Knight clone? The only thing they share in common is gliding. That is like saying Lucario is a clone of Samus for having a giant energy ball B-Special, or Wario is a clone of Sheik for sharing the crawl function.Knuckles would either be a Sonic clone or a Meta Knight clone without any changes so NO.
I imagine Knuckle's down B is that he digs then attacks. There's also the gliding and Knuckles would most likely have some hard hitting combo attack so it's like side B. Just give him Sonic's Homing Attack and a couple of changed moves and you're done. If we're gonna have another Sonic character, it would be Shadow.Impossible. Pichu's frame, hitboxes, and hurtboxes do not match Pikachu's. This has been brought up over a million times over the duration of this thread.
I can somewhat understand the part about being a Sonic clone (even though I doubt they would share anything beyond Spin-Dash), but a Meta Knight clone? The only thing they share in common is gliding. That is like saying Lucario is a clone of Samus for having a giant energy ball B-Special, or Wario is a clone of Sheik for sharing the crawl function.
What do you mean by "shoehorned"?Waluigi is a shoehorned guy from only sport sand part games and for some reason uses vines too. He's already an assist trophy anyway. If we're gonna have a Star Fox character it's Slippy and Krystal is shoehorned in while Slippy is Fox's best friend and mechanic of the team.
What makes Shadow more viable than Knuckles? Both of them could be uninspired Sonic clones, but both of them have the potential to be much more than that.I imagine Knuckle's down B is that he digs then attacks. There's also the gliding and Knuckles would most likely have some hard hitting combo attack so it's like side B. Just give him Sonic's Homing Attack and a couple of changed moves and you're done. If we're gonna have another Sonic character, it would be Shadow.
I just don't like Krystal alright?What do you mean by "shoehorned"?
What makes Shadow more viable than Knuckles? Both of them could be uninspired Sonic clones, but both of them have the potential to be much more than that.
They might be referring to the fact Krystal wasn't originally even going to be part of a Starfox Game but it was changed into one. Thing is many games and characters are spawned from things that weren't going to be what they intended, Devil May Cry was originally going to be a more actiony Resident Evil game yet the end result was changed entirely into what is now arguably the most iconic Hack n Slash game of the PS2 era. On a side note there seems to be more fans who like Krystal over Slippy but for other "assets" to her character :VWhat do you mean by "shoehorned"?
What makes Shadow more viable than Knuckles? Both of them could be uninspired Sonic clones, but both of them have the potential to be much more than that.
That's cool I guess, but I'm pretty sure that doesn't count as a good enough reason to tally your downvote.I just don't like Krystal alright?
The PM guys will be doing all of these characters from scratch, so don't let that influence how you vote.Have you seen SDOOM's Shadow? The Project M Shadow can just be a major revamp of True Shadow the Hedgehog Ver 13 maybe even use the Generations Shadow V2 by Nanobuds as it is unarguably the best Shadow model to date.
This is immediately where your problem starts.I imagine..
That will never happen. That is just sheer laziness, which the Project M devs are no slackers. Plus, the only time Knuckles has ever done Homing Attack is when Sonic Team was, in fact, being lazy with titles like Sonic Heroes, Shadow the Hedgehog, Sonic Rivals and Rivals 2, and what looks to be Sonic Boom.Just give him Sonic's Homing Attack and a couple of changed moves and you're done.
If this were the Sonic community, yeah. But this is the Smash community, and he quite frankly is ranking the absolute bottom right now.If we're gonna have another Sonic character, it would be Shadow.
Give me a reason to record the down-vote, because so far you've given me nothing....replace with Tails...
This is understandable. If the character ruins your experience, it is a legitimate reason to down-vote.I just don't like Krystal alright?
As Rasgar said, this means nothing. The Project M devs do everything from scratch. They will not be using or basing their work off existing mods. They've already said this on their website when initially announcing the possibility of new characters.Have you seen SDOOM's Shadow? The Project M Shadow can just be a major revamp of True Shadow the Hedgehog Ver 13 maybe even use the Generations Shadow V2 by Nanobuds as it is unarguably the best Shadow model to date.
If you just don't like a character to the point where it ruins your enjoyment of the game than it qualifies as reasonable. That was the point of why the down-vote function was given to us.That's cool I guess, but I'm pretty sure that doesn't count as a good enough reason to tally your downvote.
This has nothing to do with anything, but having just recently finished Sonic and the Black Knight (I guess I have a thing for bad Sonic games), I can step in and say that Knuckles is the only playable character in that game who can't do a homing attack.That will never happen. That is just sheer laziness, which the Project M devs are no slackers. Plus, the only time Knuckles has ever done Homing Attack is when Sonic Team was, in fact, being lazy with titles like Sonic Heroes, Shadow the Hedgehog, Sonic and the Black Knight, Sonic Rivals and Rivals 2, and what looks to be Sonic Boom.
Right! I actually forgot he didn't have that function there. But my point still stands.This has nothing to do with anything, but having just recently finished Sonic and the Black Knight (I guess I have a thing for bad Sonic games), I can step in and say that Knuckles is the only playable character in that game who can't do a homing attack.
As stated earlier, you need to provide reasons for your downvotes.Downvote
Ridley
Paper Mario
Pokemon Trainer
Waluigi.
Maybe I was wrong then. I figured the amendment to the rule was put in place to stop people from simply saying "well, I don't like so-and-so".If you just don't like a character to the point where it ruins your enjoyment of the game than it qualifies as reasonable. That was the point of why the down-vote function was given to us.
okay i did it thanks.As stated earlier, you need to provide reasons for your downvotes.
Maybe I was wrong then. I figured the amendment to the rule was put in place to stop people from simply saying "well, I don't like so-and-so".
Well I believe the reasoning stems further than that. Think of it from this perspective. A character who just rubs you the wrong way is added into a game you really enjoy. Playing against this character just frustrates you by the mere sight of said character. And no, not because of how they play in game. If the reason stems into being visually and mentally frustrated at the existence of a character, it can really break a person's enjoyment with the game entirely.Maybe I was wrong then. I figured the amendment to the rule was put in place to stop people from simply saying "well, I don't like so-and-so".
While I may respect your opinions here, I do have some retorts I'd like to bring up:Downvote
Ridley Reason: Smash Series Boss: Not intresting character or worth the effort.
Paper Mario Reason: Random I do like him but not over other characters not much moveset options.
Pokemon Trainer Reason: He needs to stay not existing.
Waluigi. Reason: No There is enough mario reps they rolling deep.
You don't think Paper Mario has moveset potential from everything in his games? His partners, the stickers, the hammer, the pixels, the badges, the items, the Star Spirits?Paper Mario Reason: Random I do like him but not over other characters not much moveset options.
I love the paper mario games i don't see them being able to realstictly make paper mario a good character with that engine.You don't think Paper Mario has moveset potential from everything in his games? His partners, the stickers, the hammer, the pixels, the badges, the items, the Star Spirits?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^IF PM decides between two unique characters or one unique character and four clones, I'd take the latter.
Generally speaking, clones can play wickedly different.
No Lloyd. Only characters that were in Brawl (as a trophy, sticker, etc) have a chance.+1 to Loyd Irving
+1 to Paper Mario
-1 to Waluigi
-1 to Shadow
You must provide a reason for downvotes + what Shin said+1 to Loyd Irving
+1 to Paper Mario
-1 to Waluigi
-1 to Shadow