Jerkus
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2012
- Messages
- 183
I said it was J that called Mac "waffly."But you said it was J who gave the question out? ...
That's a completely separate thing.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I said it was J that called Mac "waffly."But you said it was J who gave the question out? ...
Huh???? Didn't J said it was himself thoughThis is the J side both in the quote and posting so this'll be easy because it really is just my playstyle. I like forcing people to take a stance on reads and Mac is being waffly on stances so I want him to put his foot down and decide what he makes. This also forces Mac to have a papertrail which I can form connections and thoughts on. I do this quite practically every game. I choose to ask the hypothetical because I get more out of it then persuading him. I get him to make a decision.
How did you know I wanted goodness to love me. GOODNESS PLEASE LOVE ME MY DEAR. :3Ranmaru dear god stop. Please for the love of goodness.
Why wanted? Do you have a scumread on him? Red, yet you tell me that they should stop talking. I would think you say that so that Xat can come back and respond, and therefore give you a stronger read, but you are already comitted to his lynch...We should lynch xat or wanted. Mac and jerkus needs more time to fully settle and I dont really want to lynch them over the above mentioned slots or someone like nabe
Wanted hasnt done jack****. Thats why I think we could go his way.Why wanted? Do you have a scumread on him? Red, yet you tell me that they should stop talking. I would think you say that so that Xat can come back and respond, and therefore give you a stronger read, but you are already comitted to his lynch...
Cmon man.
except this wasn't the case 2-3 days ago when I/Zen/Others asked you to explain your reasoning. Also don't see how making a single post to explain your thought process would prevent us from getting consensus on a lynch / finding a good lynch candidate. If you woulda just made that 1 quick post instead of the billions you've made to dodge the question, the thread would have been a lot less derailed that it has been now.We are three days away from deadline. We are not even approaching consensus on a lynch. Half the player roster is still a question mark. I am not going to sit here and lay out a hunch I have on you and giraffes being mates, before I even know for sure that one of you is scum, just to have you dissect and explain why it obviously doesn't mean anything concrete. That gets us NOWHERE.
i hate settling for lynching inactives just as much as the next guy, but it's wayy better than letting players continue to coast and lurk. Plus most of the active players (save Jerkus) don't seem scummy to me so obviously i'm inclined to look elsewhereYeah, I'm keeping my vote on Macman for now. Between earlier stuff and pushing for an inactive or Bardull lynch, I still don't like him.
I really don't like pushing for an inactive lynch where we get jack **** from the flip.
It was a long day at work, and I got heavily distracted by my new Wii U. I apologize. Can I get to it tomorrow? I'm about to sleep.Werekill, can you get to Gheb's case? You said you'd explain what you disagreed with.
pretty much exactly what i was thinking when I suggested Bardull, i don't find his RVS posts to be anything but null, but at least he's had a wagon and ppl have discussed it. If we're gonna lynch an inactive I'd wanna get some semblance of info from it...let's omni the **** outta this game. we can easily get the likes of wanted/kuz/nabe replaced out or policied if they're really gonna keep up their play, but i think if we go down the inactive route it should be the of the second-grade tier inactives that have at least made themselves out to be something in thread. bottom line, the overall activity is laughable. our deadline is in three days. i don't wanna totally throw away the Day by lynching a bare balls inactive, but im more than willing to go for the closest group to em. we got 3 days left for crying out loud -.-
@mod please ignore this request and follow your own procedures for replacing peopleOh just saw all the replace slots full haha.
Mod request replacement for Kuz, BardulL, and Wanted
Mod request deadline extension if there are replacements
Rajam, Joey, and Vult have all volunteered to be replacements (check the op).Macman said:@Nameless @Sworddancer is anyone eligible for replacement?
BarDulL has just gotten back from a v/la. I'll only replace him if he requests it.Oh just saw all the replace slots full haha.
Mod request replacement for Kuz, BardulL, and Wanted
Mod request deadline extension if there are replacements
yea I meant if any of the currently player slots had yet fit the requirements for their forced replacement. your post answered the question tyRajam, Joey, and Vult have all volunteered to be replacements (check the op).
Well FF, to be fair, you have been incredibly vague and then we you decided to do something, it's actually a whole of nothing. Anyone can get away with activity policing. You were not clear on the fact that you disliked all the wagons, however, you failed to answer my better half's question:
Do you town-read all the current wagons then? You can dislike the wagons, sure, but what are your reads on the slots in question. (I.E. Macman/Jerkus/I<3Giraffe) Plus you put a vote on Wanted yet you don't do much to "pressure" him. If I were to come in and see a vote like that on me I would not even bat an eye, hell I still am not batting an eye because the wagon formed on us is not due to scumspicion put morely based on people disliking that Circus is not spoonfeeding everyone his every thoughts.
You are one I have my eye on FF. I need to talk to Circus since this is the first time in a while just you have played alone, but lately you are kind of dead weight for now.
although i will say that antagonizing frozen doesn't suit your slot very well![]()
Eh if FF wants to have a go with us too then so be it. I'll be heading up that debate if it came down to it, but FF just irks me this game and his buddying of Zen read as disgenuine>town just wanting to buddy. Actually reminded me of what I did to JakeStan in Flavorless.
Not saying that FF is a candidate for toDay, but someone I want to talk to and have a conversation with. Mainly because I disagree with a lot that he has posted.
But totally pile all your votes in at onceGet in on this Jerkus wagon. (But consider the votecount, not saying pile all your votes at once) If you support it, voice it first.