Sounds like you're confusing "3rd party developers" with "the gaming media".
And developers have a right to complain if Nintendo lags behind the hardware curve by an entire generation. Developers like working on the biggest and best hardware.
You do realize that you just defeated your own argument, right?
You wouldn't be getting DOWNGRADED ports if the WiiU's hardware was up to snuff, and that's the ENTIRE point I was making.
No, you twisted my own words :D
The ports aren't downgraded because the Wii U can't handle them, just look at Nintendo's games, the ports are downgraded because the developers are doing a sucky effort. And, oh, how I love these
'an entire generation' people that can't understand the fact that the Wii U's above the PS3 and Xbox360 on terms of hardware. I haven't ever seen a game as good-looking as Mario Kart 8...not on PS3, not on Xbox360...and actually I still haven't seen anything that comes close to matching up for the so-called
'next-gen' systems, even though the Wii U's clearly a next-gen system, it's apparent when you actually use it and explore the features.
And third-party developers and the gaming media have merged together to gang up on Nintendo. Arrogant schmucks like Takeshi Miyazoe, for example, he laughed about Dark Souls II on Wii U and said the demographic wasn't right...yeah, right, because Monster Hunter Tri Ultimate wasn't one of the best-selling games for the Wii U when it launched.
Also, why didn't you mention the fact that why would I play a downgraded port when there's beautiful-looking, optimized, smooth, 60FPS, polished Nintendo games waiting for me? Might Nintendo be too good for its own good? Maybe if their games weren't as amazing they wouldn't overshadow the crappy, westernized, modernized games that the videogame industry has been pumping up recently.
We're derailing the thread, so I'll ask to stop here. Long live Nintendo, nuff' said.