Okay, mission accomplished. Now on to mafia.
Here are things from my perspective:
Sunday afternoon I was online around midday before the game officially started and then again late in the evening. During this 8-10 hours I was offline, everything with Gheb and Such Mafia happened, condemning Gheb and clearing everyone but RR and myself. So from the very moment I was caught up and able to post, the game was completely solved for me. I didn't have to do any work. Gheb and RR were confirmed scum.
At that point, in order to even play the game, I pretty much had one choice: Make a case against RR and get him lynched D2 instead of me.
RR is accusing me of painting everything he has in a scummy light, and he's right. I'm doing exactly that. I can't be expected to do anything else. I have 100% assurance that he is scum. Maybe some of of my reasoning is stretchier than would be ideal, but my opinions have literally been biased from the start. There's no getting around that fact. I'll cop to it, because it's true. But my bias doesn't make me wrong.
Now, as for my specific case against RR, a lot of individual points have already been expressed in earlier posts. The crux of my case rests on two things:
1) RR's play has perfectly aligned with Gheb's. This is a speculative case that examines motivations. You can reject it if you want, but I've found these to be very helpful in the past. The scumteam went into this game with a very specific plan. Gheb would claim DayCop and wait for the CC. He'd give an all clear to a random townie, and then wait to see what happened. If his confirmed townie CC'd him, his scummate could easily bus and make sure the DayVig died in the night. If any other townie CC'd, they would only need to convince one other townie to vote that player for a victory. This a VERY solid plan for scum in this setup. They are guaranteed two rounds, while the townies only get one mislynch.
Given how things turned out, RR's play fits perfectly with this plan. MY play, however, does not. If Gheb was going to run this gambit, he would need his scummate at his side from the get-go. You see how Gheb came right out the gate with his claim, and RR came right out the gate asking for a CC. So far, the gambit has gone exactly as planned. Scum was able to nightkill the DayCop, bus Gheb, and cast suspicion on the last townie (me).
Now consider this scenario if I had been Gheb's scummate. I was completely absent for the entire 12-sum hours during which Gheb ran his gambit. I wasn't around for the claim, counter claim, or debate that followed. Do you think Gheb would have run this gambit if he knew his partner would be absent the first 12 hours of the game? I replaced out of my last mafia game and was largely inactive during the last mini. Do you think I would have approved of a plan that required consistency? Do you think Gheb, who saw how my play has been the past few games, would have gambled on my activity being intense enough for such a gambit? Do you think either of us would have chosen "me showing up after the fact" as the ideal scenario?
Yes, you can call WIFOM on this is you want, but these are legitimate observations. It goes to intelligence, motivation, and planning.
2) RR's case against me failed to take into account the unique situation we've found ourselves in. He's saying I'm scummy for reaching, for showing bias towards every action he's taken this game. He's failing to point out that given the way the game has gone, I have no choice BUT to show bias towards his actions. I entered the game with everything solved already. I know he's scum, which means everything that seems scummy to me I know is 100% accurate. I can't help being biased when I know I'm right.
As I pointed out earlier, proving you're town means showing honestly as often as possible. This is why I choose to play my cards close to my chest in most games I play. I'm not willing to lie as town or to put my name on an opinion that I'm not sure of. I want every word I say to be completely honest, even if it weakens my case against someone. I'm willing to admit my bias, because bias in unavoidable. RR has not only refused to acknowledge that bias is inevitable on my part, but he's actively trying to use that unavoidable bias to paint me in a scummy light.