ExLight
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2020
- Messages
- 1,305
wait what? even if he isn't?no one else to counterclaim or do anything to indicate that you think he's lying
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
wait what? even if he isn't?no one else to counterclaim or do anything to indicate that you think he's lying
I don't get what you meanI would. Cause your wincon is scum majority. If you did as traitor you don’t win with mafia. Vice verse is still a win.
Correct. Even if you are certain Boom is lying, don't say anything, don't even talk about him, just yeet Rajam and we can deal with Boom Tomorrow.wait what? even if he isn't?
ooh, I think I see what you're doingCorrect. Even if you are certain Boom is lying, don't say anything, don't even talk about him, just yeet Rajam and we can deal with Boom Tomorrow.
I believe their point, is that the traitor should still win even if their mates die, as they are technically of a separate alignment. In most games if you had a traitor, they can work like a third party, and still win if they are alive.I don't get what you mean
Nevermind I was thinking of a traitor where they don’t win unless they’re alive at endgame when scum win. There’s to many types of traitors. But looking at the front it just seems to be an additional number. Which is something to think about actually.I don't get what you mean
Yeo this with addendum of what I just said. Cause I was thinking that it was typical traitor where they have to be alive to win since it’s a non recruit. But asking for clarification on that one.I believe their point, is that the traitor should still win even if their mates die, as they are technically of a separate alignment. In most games if you had a traitor, they can work like a third party, and still win if they are alive.
Cha's point is that he would have bused frozen if it helped him in that scenario reach his win con.
Plus day 1, FF got piled on fast, I don't think it matters if the traitor bused them or not.
Yes
that's just wrong thoI believe their point, is that the traitor should still win even if their mates die, as they are technically of a separate alignment. In most games if you had a traitor, they can work like a third party, and still win if they are alive.
They cannot win solo though correct?The traitor is not a separate faction; for all tenses and purposes, they are mafia. They can still win with mafia if they are lynched or killed. However, they do not share the factional communication, and the mafia is unaware of their existence.
the role pm suggests they can thoughThey cannot win solo though correct?
This may be true, but it would save us a mislynch toMorrow. That's still a win for us overallBut if Boom is town, good chance he gets shot anyways if we don’t lynch on those grounds
What even is this logicObviously I support a Boom Lynch over Rajam, but am willing to go for Rajam if majority doesn’t pursue.
But if Boom is town, good chance he gets shot anyways if we don’t lynch on those grounds.
welcome to the vineyard.
Dead on what it reads.What even is this logic
Shhhh....This may be true, but it would save us a mislynch toMorrow. That's still a win for us overall