I guess you could either believe in God, or you could believe that the universe just created itself somehow, and then monkeys came somehow, and then people turned out from those monkeys somehow. Honestly which one sound more crazy?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
There's your homegrown American religious hate group. How about abortion clinic bombers?<hr></blockquote>
Really, I don't understand how Christians can actually say, "God told me to kill that abortionist." No He didn't. God doesn't tell anyone to blow up buildings with other innocent people in there.
But I don't like how these people do these things. They don't have the right to do so. Or to hate someone. One of Christ's main teachings was loving and forgiving, not murder and hate.
If we theoretically did go to the birth of the universe, and we observed matter being created, how could we know what was creating it? I mean, "God" is supernatural, and cannot be seen. So what now? Even if we could witness the birth of the universe, we could not prove or disprove anything, really.<hr></blockquote>
I guess only if you were deaf. I mean, God did speak these things into existance. And if they happened in the exact order and exact way it happened in the Bible, you saw a human being formed out of dust, that still wouldn't prove anything?
If "God" is so omnipotent, why are must all of his actions be performed through man? Is he just too pathetic to do it himself?<hr></blockquote>
Good question![]()
God doesn't need any of our help since He is omnipotent. But, since He knows we're capable of doing some things, He allowed us, those who love and trust Him and want to do His will, will move that person into doing it. He wants people to trust and love Him more, and get into the action of what God does in everyday life, so that person could be closer to God, which God wants.
Why cant God just exist and non exist at the same time?<hr></blockquote>
Because it's either one or the other. You can't have both.
Why does it have to be either 100 degrees celsius or absolute zero, why cant it be all and none at the same time?<hr></blockquote>
It doesn't matter what we say, it matter what the weather says. If it's -100 degrees celcius, and someone says it's 200 degrees celsius, then the person who measured the weather is incorrect.
But I don't understand the point you're trying to make...
More to come later. Gotta go![]()
Have a nice day!![]()
And honestly, I see no pleasures from believing in such a thing. As an atheist, I couldn't be happier. You theists devote your lives and close-minded minds to something you cannot even prove exists. Your only "proof" is your own faith. I'll tell you right now: faith is not proof.<hr></blockquote>
That is just the thing.....I DON'T NEED PROOF. I have faith, and i believe...if anybody here is close-minded, it's you Cronos.
If "God" is so omnipotent, why are must all of his actions be performed through man? Is he just too pathetic to do it himself?<hr></blockquote>
Did not the spirit of GOD take the first-born of every family unless they had the blood of the passover lamb on their door?
And honestly, I see no pleasures from believing in such a thing. As an atheist, I couldn't be happier. You theists devote your lives and close-minded minds to something you cannot even prove exists. Your only "proof" is your own faith. I'll tell you right now: faith is not proof.<hr></blockquote>
But see, God reveals Himself to others to give proof to them that He exists. If he didn't, then He wouldn't have said, "Seek me with all your heart, and you will find me."
But like I said, people don't bother seeking God. And because of that, they won't find Him. Pretty simple, isn't it? If someone was truly searching for God, then later on they'll find Him. He'll give them the proof when the time is right if they are still searching.
[ December 16, 2001: Message edited by: SnorSnor ]</p>
Ghastriph:
Yes, and all of those people were evil, especially the little babies that didn't even grow into the ways of the Egyptians yet. If we really were to follow the ways of God, then we should go kill all first-borns of our enemies.
<hr></blockquote>
No, you're missing the point. Crono said that GOD needed MAN to do everything, and I quickly disproved that theory with the above example. As soon as I provided an example, someone had to go and manipulate it and act as if it were non-existant.
Fact: Man came into existence about 10,000 years ago, yet Noah and the Ark occurred in the time of the supercontinent.<hr></blockquote>
That's assuming the whole "Earth is 6.1 Billion years old theory." How can you base facts out of thory? This is why it's impossible to prove either way.
Yes, and all of those people were evil, especially the little babies that didn't even grow into the ways of the Egyptians yet. If we really were to follow the ways of God, then we should go kill all first-borns of our enemies.<hr></blockquote>
The killing of the first-born was a one time thing. It never would've happened if the Pharoh would've just let the Israelites go. But since Pharoh didn't let them go, those who didn't have any blood of the lamb on their doors would have their first-born killed. And probably every Israelite had blood on their doors. Punishment on Egypt is what it is, and only God carries out the punishment. He saw that some people desrved to have their first-born's killed. If you think about it, having a first-born killed is nothing compared to what we all deserve.
Fact: Even the heaviest of rains could not cover the highest peaks, could not even come close.<hr></blockquote>
Since we know that God can do impossible things, rain shouldn't be that hard for Him...
Fact: Man came into existence about 10,000 years ago, yet Noah and the Ark occurred in the time of the supercontinent.<hr></blockquote>
Not a fact. Dates are merely assumption.
The birth of our universe can never be explained. This is why people created religion in the first place: to create answers for the unanswerable. To explain the universe's formation, we'd have to travel back in time, but that is, of course, impossible.<hr></blockquote>
Ok....let me say this slowly...It is a fact that:
1)A man named Jesus was born and actually walked on the Earth
2)He was actually crucified...on a cross...with 1 person to his left and 1 to his right.
People didn't just make JESUS up out of sheer boredom or for an explanation to things.
Matthew 12:1-14 - At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the sabbath; his disciples were hungry, and they began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. But when the Pharisees saw it, they said to him, "Look, your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the sabbath." He said to them, "Have you not read what David did, when he was hungry, and those who were with him: how he entered the house of God and ate the bread of the Presence, which it was not lawful for him to eat nor for those who were with him, but only for the priests? Or have you not read in the law how on the sabbath the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are guiltless? I tell you, something greater than the temple is here. And if you had known what this means, 'I desire mercy, and not sacrifice,' you would not have condemned the guiltless. For the Son of man is lord of the sabbath." And he went on from there, and entered their synagogue. And behold, there was a man with a withered hand. And they asked him, "Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath?" so that they might accuse him. He said to them, "What man of you, if he has one sheep and it falls into a pit on the sabbath, will not lay hold of it and lift it out? Of how much more value is a man than a sheep! So it is lawful to do good on the sabbath." Then he said to the man, "Stretch out your hand." And the man stretched it out, and it was restored, whole like the other.<hr></blockquote>
Since we know God only does good, and does no wrong, He's working every day.
Did not the spirit of GOD take the first-born of every family unless they had the blood of the passover lamb on their door? <hr></blockquote>
You're right. Your deity did nothing. That little bible story is just a myth.
No, you're missing the point. Crono said that GOD needed MAN to do everything, and I quickly disproved that theory with the above example. As soon as I provided an example, someone had to go and manipulate it and act as if it were non-existant. <hr></blockquote>
You disproved nothing with your bible quote. Even if your god killed those freaking kids, he did need man to do something. He needed them to put the blood on their doors. Why would god need that? To discern the Egyptians from the Israelites? Wouldn't he know already?
Ok....let me say this slowly...It is a fact that:1)A man named Jesus was born and actually walked on the Earth
2)He was actually crucified...with one person on his left and one person on his right.
People didn't just make JESUS up out of sheer boredom or for an explanation to things. <hr></blockquote>
Really? jebus walked? Sorry, I thought he flew.
Ok, so he was crucified. Along with thousands of others during the Roman Empire.
They may not have made up jesus, but jesus made up the judeo-xian god, which is used for an explanation to things. It's all propaganda.
By the way, Ghastriph, the FACT is that the earth is at least 4.6 billion years old, not 6.1. Man, get your facts straight.
Originally posted by SnorSnor:
<strong>Interesting, Mike, but I wouldn't put much trust in that. Yes, God did rest on the seventh day... but, that doesn't mean God rests and does literally nothing. God is, actually, at work every day.
God is at work in the hearts of those who accepted Jesus to make them as He sees fit, is working at guiding people to believe in Him, and a ton more.
I'll even post a verse about God doing something on the Sabbath (The day God rested).
Since we know God only does good, and does no wrong, He's working every day.</strong><hr></blockquote>
What he meant by resting is not taking literally. He meant "God" is not as active as he/she/it was in the days of the "bible".
Originally posted by Mike Larkenson:
<strong>
What he meant by resting is not taking literally. He meant "God" is not as active as he/she/it was in the days of the "bible".</strong><hr></blockquote>
He's as active as He ever was...
Oh, I checked into the site, and it was pretty big. I'll go over it on the weekend when I have more time
[ December 17, 2001: Message edited by: SnorSnor ]</p>
You're right. Your deity did nothing. That little bible story is just a myth.<hr></blockquote>
oh, really...it is? I guess I'm an atheist now.![]()
You disproved nothing with your bible quote. Even if your god killed those freaking kids, he did need man to do something. He needed them to put the blood on their doors. Why would god need that? To discern the Egyptians from the Israelites? Wouldn't he know already?<hr></blockquote>
Man, you are truly stubborn.
The people put the blood on the doors so GOD can tell the believers from the non-believers. This was before Jesus' Crucifixion, so nobody, really, had the Spirit of Christ inside of them....except for a few people....(read:: Moses, etc...)
Originally posted by Novowels:
<strong>Therefore, I ask this:
Can God create a rock that He cannot break?
If he can create a rock that he cannot break, then he cannot break a rock. Therefore there is something He cannot do, therefore He is not ALL POWERFUL, ergo he does not exist.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Nov, that's like the question: Can He create a rock so big that he can't lift it? Yes, seeing as He is omnipotent, Hee can create a rock, no matter what size, and still lift it with ease. Same with an unbreakable rock. Nothing is too hard for Him.
Chris, glad you're having fun![]()
...on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth...<hr></blockquote>
and
...the fountains of the deep and the windows of the heavens were closed...<hr></blockquote>
And we do know that water is under the earth. I don't remember the name of it, but there is.
The Bible also says the earth is a sphere.
Isaiah 40:22 - It is he who sits above the circle of the earth,<hr></blockquote>
In Hebrew, the word "circle" means "sphere." So, some people, even around atleast four thousand years back, have believe the earth was a sphere, and not flat.
Isaiah, also, is speaking of God, who sits in heaven. Since heaven is above the earth, well, you know![]()
Edit: Sorry, messed up on the quote tags =/
[ December 18, 2001: Message edited by: SnorSnor ]</p>
Originally posted by Chrisputer:
<strong>These are just a few things to think over.
Doesn't evolution violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics?
If there was a big bang, Doesn't the fact that the galaxys and planets are spinning in different dirrection violate the law of centrifical force?
If our earth is slowing down ever so slowly, And we went back into time to see how fast it was spinning 1 billion-gazzilion years ago, wouldn't it be spinning to fast to have anything on it?
If our earth's magnetic field decreases by 5% every decade, wouldn't the magnetic field be strong enough billions of years ago to just simply attact every single asteroid around which would smash the earth to pieces?
If the moon is slowly losing it's orbit from earth, and we traced it back 20 bazzilion years, it would have started from earth. Now in order for that to happen something has to hit earth so that a huge chunk of earth would go flying away. It would have to get far enough away from earth to defy gravity but stay close enough to keep it's orbit, which is in a sense, impossible.
Have any answers for those?I'd love to hear them!
This is fun :D </strong><hr></blockquote>
This is ridiculous, that's what it is. You are skewing facts and showing that you are making assumptions without looking further into the subject. For evolution and the 2nd law of thermodynamics, check this <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/thermo/probability.html" target="_blank">url</a>. Now as for your 2nd reason, you must not really believe in centrifical force because that is what disproves your 3rd reason. Centrifical force is what holds things to the earth, and you also are believing that the earth slowing down is a constant decay model. Same goes for your 4th reason, and also the magnetic field is not as strong as you think it is, or else the moon right now would be coming straight for us. And once again we get lead into the next reason. What do you think satellites are? They do not achieve 100% efficiency as that is impossible, but they come so close to escape velocity that the amount they come closer to the earth is minimal, negligible even.
Now if one were to believe these five reasons, only the first two are relevant to the subject matter.
Originally posted by Chrisputer:
<strong>Doesn't evolution violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics?
</strong>Not really since we have an outside power source continually pouring power into the system. (If you understand the above question you will understand this answer)<strong>
If there was a big bang, Doesn't the fact that the galaxys and planets are spinning in different dirrection violate the law of centrifical force?
</strong>No, the direction of centrifugal (Not centrifical) is not based on the initial impulse of expansion. It is based on how the mass comes together as it forms a planet, star, etc. (Basic physics. Not even hard stuff.)<strong>
If our earth is slowing down ever so slowly, And we went back into time to see how fast it was spinning 1 billion-gazzilion years ago, wouldn't it be spinning to fast to have anything on it?
</strong>The rate of decay isn't constant. There are no constants in the universe. Even light varies in speed on the automic level. To think that there are (constants) would be a [just plain stupid] of you. (For the most part the fluctation is small enough for it to be considered a constant for any math equation. Don't yell at me.)<strong>
If our earth's magnetic field decreases by 5% every decade, wouldn't the magnetic field be strong enough billions of years ago to just simply attact every single asteroid around which would smash the earth to pieces?
</strong>Refer back to constants answer. And, the magnetic field fluctuates stronger and weaker. It is not one way always becoming weaker until it disapears.<strong>
If the moon is slowly losing it's orbit from earth, and we traced it back 20 bazzilion years, it would have started from earth. Now in order for that to happen something has to hit earth so that a huge chunk of earth would go flying away. It would have to get far enough away from earth to defy gravity but stay close enough to keep it's orbit, which is in a sense, impossible.
</strong>A third constants question in a row! In this case we deal with mass, gravitation, velocities, resistances and a slew of other variables that make up a physics model. (I suggest you look at one sometime.)<strong>
</strong><hr></blockquote>