*sigh*
First Backlash, I have nothing against you. I do have videos up just look at my post history (or the thread in this forum Marth > Ike). Keep in mind those videos were a few weeks ago I've incorporated new things into my game since then. But I'm not claiming to be good so who cares. You have a fair point about not mentioning drago.
Sorry I didn't read your wall of text really carefully so I may have missed a few points, but I'm not going to play you online because my connection sucks. You can just watch my old videos. But I'm not challenging you so who cares? I'm just saying don't assume yourself to be as good as these guys until you have some tournament results to back yourself up or you have some tourney videos.
Second bluedeath1000, this conversation isn't going anywhere because you assume to me to be an idiot, and because you speak in that way, I assume you to be an *** and equally stupid :D I have plenty of smash bros knowledge... you keep repeating how combos don't mean anything.
In melee if you saw someone doing a waveshine combo, it doesn't necessarily mean they're the best, but it shows that they have the potential to pull it out on you in a match. In 64, being able to do zero to deaths meant that you had enough skill to possibly do it in a match. MOST people are not capable of these things.
I don't care if the 100 people at a national tournament can easily do combos, I'm not going to be playing against them. In Brawl, if you see a Marth spike over 20 times in match vids, you will know that the Marth AT LEAST has the timing of the spike fairly accurately. I realize in Brawl you can't really combo a la 64 or melee, but the fact that a person is chaining hits into death or high percentage gives the person the potential to be able to do that against you.
I know you're good bluedeath, but keep in mind that most of the smash population can't chain hits in Brawl no matter what. This has been my experience from watching many YouTube videos and going to tournaments.