• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Lion vs Tiger

Status
Not open for further replies.

BOB SAGET!

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
1,125
Location
CANADA
ok, I know a lot of people wonder who would win between these two beasts in a fight. This fight will be between an African Lion and an Amur Tiger and they will both be males. Before we start the debate here are the sizes of the two fighters.

African Lion: Size: Head and body, 4.5 to 6.5 ft (1.4 to 2 m); Tail, 26.25 to 39.5 in (67 to 100 cm)
Weight: 265 to 420 lbs (120 to 191 kg)

Amur Tiger: Size: 10.75 ft (3.3 m)
Weight: 660 lbs (300 kg)

the fight will take place in the Gir Forest to be fair since none of these types of lions or tigers live there.
 

GwJ

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
5,833
Location
Pennsylvania
NNID
Baghul
The lion, it'll run circles around the hefty tiger. That is, unless the tiger actually lands a good smack on the lion, then it'll flip to the tiger being in favor.
 

BOB SAGET!

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
1,125
Location
CANADA
a tiger is more agile and is a faster sprinter than the lion. the tiger fights on both feet. lions paw swipe putting their whole body to it, so a lion can easily be put of balance by the stronger tiger. the tiger is also stronger pound for pound.
 

¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,115
Location
Chicago, IL
Well let's look at the advantages that each cat has.

Tigers are more agile, and have stronger back legs than lions, giving them greater leaping ability. They are also faster, which obviously helps when fighting. Tigers also have larger canine teeth, longer claws, and bigger paws. This coupled with it's strong back legs will allow it to attack with its claws while resting back on its haunches.

Lions are more powerful, brute force attackers. Lions have stronger shoulders and forearms, which means that their claw strikes would be more powerful. A lion's mane is very interesting. It can be used defensively, because all that hair and fur will protect its neck from being easily ripped open. It can also be used for intimidation purposes, because it'll look larger than it is in actuality. Another intimidation factor is the fact that lions are taller than tigers.

In the end, I'd have to go with the tiger, it's agility really helps it, both offensively and defensively.

Got most of this from http://indrajit.wordpress.com/category/lion-vs-tiger/

I know the site mentions different kinds of lions/tigers, but I can't imagine it'd be too different.
 

Zero Beat

Cognitive Scientist
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
3,924
Location
MIT Observatory
NNID
BLUE
3DS FC
4141-3279-8878
I'd like to add a post that Faithkeeper made in the main room. Found it pretty interesting.

What are your thoughts on it?

For those interested:

1 tiger > 1 lion
10 lions > 10 tigers

Tigers are the better fighters, but lions can use teamwork, tigers don't.

/random off topic post.
 

Crimson King

I am become death
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
28,982
This is an example of a debate that would be closed in the real room.
 

BOB SAGET!

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
1,125
Location
CANADA
The fact is, the lion has slightly more massively built shoulders and the tiger has more developed legs. Overall a tiger is more massively built than a lion. Even pound for pound, a tiger has anatomy-advantage over a lion in the forequarters. this is from the link u sent me and its true but the tiger is stronger pound for pound, the lion is the weakest big cat pound for pound.

@crismon king: did u come here to debate or not.

@ZeroBeat: Faithkeeper doesnt know what hes talking about. he didnt even read my thread, he probably just looked at the title becasue my thread is about who would win 1 on 1. a tiger would in my opinion beat a lion. the tiger is stronger with the added weight and pound for pound. the tiger is more agile and has a larger bite force, claws and teeth. the tiger fights on 2 feet unlike the lion, so the tiger has more balance.
 

Eor

Banned via Warnings
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
9,963
Location
Bed
Simba would curbstomp Tony
 

RDK

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,390
Seriously? Why is this thread not closed yet? If a someone from any other respectable debate forum saw a topic like this they would laugh us out of town. Close this ****.

That being said, I'll say what I said in the PG Thread. Lions would totally win. Tigers are Asian, and nobody likes Asians.
 

BOB SAGET!

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
1,125
Location
CANADA
what kind of arguemnet is that RDK. first off all to all asians who r reading this dont mind him. he just likes to make fun of people. anyway..... a lion is smaller, weaker pound for pound and cant fight as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom