I mean, sure, once a soft thrown bomb has come to a complete stop it won't activate on an opponent's hurtbox, but that doesn't mean that it's a bad thing. As we all know, bombs start flashing super early which is really off-putting. If it's bad for us, then imagine what's going through the opponent's mind when they see the soft thrown bomb immediately start flashing. For the entire duration that it's there, they're expecting it to explode at any moment. I've also never really had any difficulty with people using my bombs against me because the range that the bomb gets thrown can be covered by, well everything Link has, and if you mix up the amount of time you cook the bomb, then that keeps them on their toes expecting the worst when you haven't cooked it.
Anyway, more to your point, I would have to agree that according to the facts, it would be beneficial in a neutral situation if we cook our bombs more often before we throw them. This will make shielded bombs and soft thrown bombs that much more potent for forcing errors due to people dropping their shields, and it will then mean that they will respect the bombs more and be forced to roll away or continue to hold shield if a bomb hits it. Keep in mind that bombs do extra damage if they hit indirectly, so if we end up hitting them more with the explosions caused by the fuse running out right in front of them while being thrown this can only benefit us.
The trouble with cooking bombs however is that our options are somewhat depleted while holding them, which could hurt not only our spam wall but in general will make us more open to being rushed down.
I mean, I certainly wouldn't be immediately throwing any bombs at a shield if I see a shield up 'because it's keeping on the pressure'. No, just no. That's a waste of a bomb and you're applying much more pressure on them by standing outside cooking your bomb, and then you can throw it at them if they persist in their strategy. I think if we factored in little things like that, then we'd start seeing our bombs becoming more effective.
Anyway, more to your point, I would have to agree that according to the facts, it would be beneficial in a neutral situation if we cook our bombs more often before we throw them. This will make shielded bombs and soft thrown bombs that much more potent for forcing errors due to people dropping their shields, and it will then mean that they will respect the bombs more and be forced to roll away or continue to hold shield if a bomb hits it. Keep in mind that bombs do extra damage if they hit indirectly, so if we end up hitting them more with the explosions caused by the fuse running out right in front of them while being thrown this can only benefit us.
The trouble with cooking bombs however is that our options are somewhat depleted while holding them, which could hurt not only our spam wall but in general will make us more open to being rushed down.
I mean, I certainly wouldn't be immediately throwing any bombs at a shield if I see a shield up 'because it's keeping on the pressure'. No, just no. That's a waste of a bomb and you're applying much more pressure on them by standing outside cooking your bomb, and then you can throw it at them if they persist in their strategy. I think if we factored in little things like that, then we'd start seeing our bombs becoming more effective.
Last edited: