Elessar
Nouyons TO
Wait till Sunday and you'll find out.You guys remember when Link used to be pretty good? Thanks Sakurai.
Wonder how they'll demolish Link even further.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Wait till Sunday and you'll find out.You guys remember when Link used to be pretty good? Thanks Sakurai.
Wonder how they'll demolish Link even further.
May the Triforce of Courage be with us.Wait till Sunday and you'll find out.
FG kid, I play as captain falcon cause he is fast, that makes me good at smash brothers automatically.In other words, your fundamentals as a player should be more important than your main's placement on a teir list. Just because you play a good character, doesn't exactly make you good. And besides, a teir list can change, so until you're a solid player, then it shouldn't mean jack s*** to you.
Edit: Didn't see Elessar's post when typing this, but yeah, what he said.
I will respond to you under the cut since you asked a direct question here.If anything is pointless, it would be reading your nonsensical post where not only you mentioned Shulk twice, but you also say "link is better but has bad MU vs". What, pray tell, was your measure for "better" if not MU?
In case none of you knew what a logical fallacy was, you're looking at one.Heck, you even say that we have a favorable or equal MU vs ZSS. That itself already disqualified your entire "ranking".
Nay - two!In fact, you entire ranking is off.
Here, because you decided not to read my post;We don't have an even or favorable MU vs Falcon nor Pikachu. Pit isn't worse than Link, and Gay and Wario aren't even with us.
Anyway. I have played the Pikachu matchup more than any other. He gives us trouble, but we stop all of his stuff and kill him early. I wouldn't say we have the advantage, but saying the MU is even is accurate imo. I could be wrong about falcon. However once again, we out prioritize the majority of his moves. A good spacing game stops any falcon. Heck, our own MU thread on falcon says that we have an even->maybe favorable MU with him. Just not lag falcon. That stuff's dumb.I am willing to hear out counter arguments or whatever, but your reasoning behind it, and possibly game footage to accompany your argument would be appreciated.
And this is why I'm positive you don't know how tiers work. Link is Mid tier because of his MUs. It doesn't have anything to do with how difficult a character is to play as. For instance - Fox's waveshining in Melee is arguably one of the most difficult techs to pull off, but yet he is still top tier. Why is Fox top tier in melee? Is it because of how easy he is to play? No! It's because he has a superior MU against every character except Marth. My point is, midtiers in smash 4 will have MUs that their character wins for them, and they'll also have MUs where they have to win in spite of their character.Link is crap because it takes too much effort to do anything. We have no real/worthwhile punishes, no combos, too slow to act on reaction, our cqc is a joke, we get out spammed by characters that have one projectile, get juggled too easily, and our grab game is dead. To do anything with Link you still have to be superior to your opponent since Link won't do crap for you.
There, want a tier list? That's one question that will give you one. Can this character win for me or must I win in spite of the char? If you have to win in spite of him (as is with Link) then he's a low tier char. Not because he's bad, but becuase he takes work and commitment with little pay. People will always flock to chars that win for you (little investment, high reward) and so their meta will be more developed and they will have more representation. Link is low tier because as a char he offers no advantages and you have to work for your wins.
I was being half-sarcastic. I do actually want to hear his opinion. Was just responding to his snark with snark.1) DUKEL was probably being snarky at cat and doesn't axtually/honestly want to hear from experience.
He died?RIP Cristopher Lee. You made a great Saruman.
I blame AceStar. One of the most popular Smash YouTubers releasing a video declaring Link to be OP, simply because he wasn't a capable enough player to deal with him.Can we all just agree that Link got screwed over majorly? He was BARELY viable before the nerfs, then they destroyed him because he's popular.
Link's popular?then they destroyed him because he's popular./quote]
My last tournament were 3 links (including me) out of 36... the other two were FG level... btw, I'm a little more confident of myself to classify me as FG scrub...I saw three links at the last tourney I was at. And the tourney only had 60 people.
Granted, all three of them were FG Links but...
Be sure to leave some hate comments for him and explain how Nintendo should have went about patching Link's jab. And the fact that Nintendo actually took his video seriously shows how inexperienced Sakurai's staff is. Why did Namco have to leave? Ugh.I blame AceStar. One of the most popular Smash YouTubers releasing a video declaring Link to be OP, simply because he wasn't a capable enough player to deal with him.
The video's very painful to watch. He pretty much posted it due to salt, and you can hear his whine the entire video.
So it was his video, and the many many many people calling the jab cancel an infinite...
He got nerfed so hard due to misinformation and stupidity.
If that is indeed true, it could be safe to expect a buff to jab 2's ability to combo into things. But yeah, someone needs to look for that. I remember someone talking about it and saying that it was BS because jab 2 doesn't actually combo into anything besides maybe jab 3. But even if it is true that the information is in the game, Nintendo could always just remove it and not do ****.Do you guys remember the tip in the vault that said that Link's jab linked into anything? I have been looking for it since some days ago and can't find it. Do any of you have a screenshot or a link about it that could share, please?
It is probably gone because that would be a false statement now.Do you guys remember the tip in the vault that said that Link's jab linked into anything? I have been looking for it since some days ago and can't find it. Do any of you have a screenshot or a link about it that could share, please?
I remember that tip in the vault.Do you guys remember the tip in the vault that said that Link's jab linked into anything? I have been looking for it since some days ago and can't find it. Do any of you have a screenshot or a link about it that could share, please?
Or you could just, you know...use the forum's built in sarcasm feature? Just do like you're gonna make a quote or spoiler and write "sarcasm" in the brackets (without the quotation marks, of course). It'll generate a funny looking text Ļίķέ ţħίş.Well, it is kind of hard to tell if someone is sarcastic on the internet. Maybe add some like *sarcasm* something next time you are sarcastic.
A) I've never been a mod of the Link boards. Although I'm flattered that you liken my demeanor unto one worthy of modship.Does it matter? Probably not. It's still something that we can discuss and debate over instead of the pointless trash that filled last page between former mod + person who puts too much stock in age.
Most defiantly indeed lol.Or you could just, you know...use the forum's built in sarcasm feature? Just do like you're gonna make a quote or spoiler and write "sarcasm" in the brackets (without the quotation marks, of course). It'll generate a funny looking text Ļίķέ ţħίş.
A) I've never been a mod of the Link boards. Although I'm flattered that you liken my demeanor unto one worthy of modship.
B) When referring to 'pointless trash' I assume you're talking about the content that came from the opposite party because my posts most defiantly had a point. It just seems that some people (including the intended recipient) were too dense to realize it.
Well played.Actual List of Characters worse than Link:
He played a great Count dooku from star wars and saruman from LotR. He will be missed.RIP Cristopher Lee. You made a great Saruman.
This patch better buff Link is some areas.May the Triforce of Courage be with us.
****ing **** head. Hope they nerf his character hard.I blame AceStar. One of the most popular Smash YouTubers releasing a video declaring Link to be OP, simply because he wasn't a capable enough player to deal with him.
The video's very painful to watch. He pretty much posted it due to salt, and you can hear his whine the entire video.
So it was his video, and the many many many people calling the jab cancel an infinite...
He got nerfed so hard due to misinformation and stupidity.
Link popular... *busts out laughing* more like infamous.Link's popular?
Wyut?
Except for the fact that he wins the favorite video game character tourney every year?Link popular... *busts out laughing* more like infamous.
But we are not talking about 'favorite video game character tourney' are we?Except for the fact that he wins the favorite video game character tourney every year?
People WANT to play as link. It's just a shame he's poo. He is used by casual people a loootExcept for the fact that he wins the favorite video game character tourney every year?
THANK YOU! ShinnyMetal I love. You get what I am saying.People WANT to play as link. It's just a shame he's poo. He is used by casual people a looot
I am merely stating that Link is a popular character, there is indisputable evidence supporting that. Especially among more casual players.But we are not talking about 'favorite video game character tourney' are we?
Yeah, I can't disagree with you. I have a friend who loves the Zelda series... But says Link is his least favorite character cause I 2 stock him every time we play. LOL scrubs.I am merely stating that Link is a popular character, there is indisputable evidence supporting that. Especially among more casual players.
The only group that he is "infamous" among are salty scrubs who can't shield.
you tried to kill with Dtilt on sudden death?The only potential buff I see coming, is dtilt. They're probably going to make it kill like a normal move again, because dtilt as of now can't even kill in sudden death - which is bullsh**.
I don't know. A lot of the time that seems to be the case with some series. Just look at SS.Just because it's different doesn't necessarily mean it's bad.
There's a sarcasm feature?Or you could just, you know...use the forum's built in sarcasm feature? Just do like you're gonna make a quote or spoiler and write "sarcasm" in the brackets (without the quotation marks, of course). It'll generate a funny looking text Ļίķέ ţħίş.
Skyward sword was amazing.Have you guys heard this piece yet?
Its.....beautiful.....
It brings back a lot of memories.
I don't know. A lot of the time that seems to be the case with some series. Just look at SS.
There's a sarcasm feature?
[sarcasm]Testing[/sarcasm]
Edit: Dam, it's not working :/
I don't attempt the impossible.you tried to kill with Dtilt on sudden death?
Can I have a link to this video?I blame AceStar. One of the most popular Smash YouTubers releasing a video declaring Link to be OP, simply because he wasn't a capable enough player to deal with him.
The video's very painful to watch. He pretty much posted it due to salt, and you can hear his whine the entire video.
So it was his video, and the many many many people calling the jab cancel an infinite...
He got nerfed so hard due to misinformation and stupidity.
WHOA! that hit me like a brick. well played man, well played.I don't attempt the impossible.
Hm...thats weird. Maybe it's a premium member only thing?Edit: Dam, it's not working :/