Geno Boost
Smash Master
i have a question wich character is more important King k. Rool or Dixie Kong or Donkey Kong jr.?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Definitely not DK Jr. DK Jr. was only important in the original DK Jr. games, and that was it. He's made intermittent appearances since as cameos, but nothing more.i have a question wich character is more important King k. Rool or Dixie Kong or Donkey Kong jr.?
DK Jr is the young form of the current DK (Country onwards) with the old DK (From the arcade game) being Cranky Kong.i have a question wich character is more important King k. Rool or Dixie Kong or Donkey Kong jr.?
Technically, Dixie has been a main character once.DK Jr is the young form of the current DK (Country onwards) with the old DK (From the arcade game) being Cranky Kong.
K Rool is the main antagonist whilst Dixie is a sidekick (and Diddy's girlfriend)
I'd say K Rool > Dixie > DK Jr on the grounds that DK Jr would be unnecessary and my opinion being Main Antagonist > Sidekick
K. Rool is the recurring antagonist, Dixie is a supporting hero (arguably the tritagonist after DK and Diddy, respectively), and Junior hasn't done anything in years.i have a question wich character is more important King k. Rool or Dixie Kong or Donkey Kong jr.?
It could be argued that Dixie is about as prominent as K. Rool, but Dixie has had far less storyline roles than Dixie has. In general, they've got about the same number of games, though Dixie has one less "main" game appearance (she wasn't in either DK64 or DKC). At the same time, her being the star of one of those games kinda makes up for the lack of appearances, and Dixie had no story role in the pegboard games, either.K. Rool is the recurring antagonist, Dixie is a supporting hero (arguably the tritagonist after DK and Diddy, respectively), and Junior hasn't done anything in years.
It's up to interpretation, really, though I'd argue K. Rool is more important to the series in terms of recurring prominence and narrative role.
Agreed.It could be argued that Dixie is about as prominent as K. Rool, but Dixie has had far less storyline roles than Dixie has. In general, they've got about the same number of games, though Dixie has one less "main" game appearance (she wasn't in either DK64 or DKC). At the same time, her being the star of one of those games kinda makes up for the lack of appearances, and Dixie had no story role in the pegboard games, either.
in my opinion i feel donkey jr. is the more important to nintendo but not his chances in super smash.i have a question wich character is more important King k. Rool or Dixie Kong or Donkey Kong jr.?
If being family was important Cranky would be playablein my opinion i feel donkey jr. is the more important to nintendo but not his chances in super smash.
becuase he is donkey kong son just like bowser jr. he was a big part of nintendo in the 80s he is also a part of the first nintendo characters (like luigi and little mac) and look at this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1KrrnBJ0Vs he even get his own cartoon and he still appear in new games (as a cameo mostly but dixie kong and king k. rool doesnt appear in too many games like donkey kong jr. did wich means nintendo still care about him)
but i dont think he have a good chance to be in smash (i am surprised there isnt a thread about donkey kong jr. in smashboards)
cranky kong isnt the original donkey kong and i was just talking about how dk jr. was important to nintendo but not in super smashIf being family was important Cranky would be playable
Pretty sure he was the original, and I also referred to VGA 2013cranky kong isnt the original donkey kong and i was just talking about how dk jr. was important to nintendo but not in super smash
no because dk jr. still appear in new games after cranky kong appears in donkey kong contry so =/= DK jr.Pretty sure he was the original, and I also referred to VGA 2013
my point about VGA still standsno because dk jr. still appear in new games after cranky kong appears in donkey kong contry so =/= DK jr.
"I was throwing barrels and whisking off maidens seven days a week, I was! None of this lazing around on a beach!"cranky kong isnt the original donkey kong and i was just talking about how dk jr. was important to nintendo but not in super smash
What's the most recent game with DK jr.?no because dk jr. still appear in new games after cranky kong appears in donkey kong contry so =/= DK jr.
As a character? Mario Tennis for the N64. Apparently he was added because Nintendo/Camelot weren't sure if they could use Diddy.What's the most recent game with DK jr.?
Sooo...As a character? Mario Tennis for the N64. Apparently he was added because Nintendo/Camelot weren't sure if they could use Diddy.
His most recent appearance is a cameo in TF's Aqueduct Assault.
A major difference is that DK Jr. comes from a few spinoff arcade titles whereas K. Rool comes from what is wildly considered to be the golden days of the franchise. A more accurate comparison would be to the Zelda franchise, Ganondorf has been absent for many years, disregarding remakes and spinoffs, yet he's still very much the antagonist just as well as the Kremling King.On the subject of DK Jr., certain essay-writers have compared K. Rool to DK Jr. on the grounds that "they are both products of a certain era of DK's history who have slowly been retired until they only appear in Mario spin-offs."
I don't think it's as faulty as the "K. Rool = Geno" comparison, but it's still far from perfect IMO. Thoughts?
Well, considering there are no humans in the Donkey Kong series, it'd be a bit bizarre.Speaking of Ganondorf, how would you react if there was a human version of K. Rool as the new villain in DKC.
That wouldn't make any sense whatsoever.Speaking of Ganondorf, how would you react if there was a human version of K. Rool as the new villain in DKC.
Terrible, terrible dA fanart.Well, considering there are no humans in the Donkey Kong series, it'd be a bit bizarre.
What would a human version of K. Rool look like I wonder?
Fair point. Let me revise my thesis statement:Though there are humans in the series, Mario and Pauline in the original and Mario and Link in DKC2.
Unless you count Mario from the original Donkey Kong arcade games.Well, considering there are no humans in the Donkey Kong series, it'd be a bit bizarre.
What would a human version of K. Rool look like I wonder?
I actually really like that depiction of k rool as human, i wouldn't want in in my dkc game, but its coolUnless you count Mario from the original Donkey Kong arcade games.
Answer from the artists on Devianart:
View attachment 37526
View attachment 37527
Nah, Mario learned his lesson in DK Jr., it's obvious he was made to be one of the good guys. Besides, one could say he kidnapped DK in that game as payback for kidnapping Pauline in the original DK game.The only human I want to see in the DKU is Stanley the Bugman. I miss that guy. And maybe bring back Mario's villainous ways which, for many DK fans, is his real role.
thats wierd but how would cranky kong be the original dk but mario doesnt get white mustache now after all these years at same time donkey kong can still see dk jr. while dk jr. now is that we have now???"I was throwing barrels and whisking off maidens seven days a week, I was! None of this lazing around on a beach!"
Certainly sounds like the original Donkey Kong to me.
I'm pretty much in agreement with @ JaidynReiman regarding those importance standings. . .once K. Rool comes back, the stance that K. Rool > Dixie will be far less contentious than it is now.
Of course, DK Jr. would vault ahead of those two if you interpret the character as the modern DK. That's an individual thing, though.
The star festival only takes place every 100 years, Mario was at two of thosethats wierd but how would cranky kong be the original dk but mario doesnt get white mustache now after all these years at same time donkey kong can still see dk jr. while dk jr. now is that we have now???
Because plot.thats wierd but how would cranky kong be the original dk but mario doesnt get white mustache now after all these years at same time donkey kong can still see dk jr. while dk jr. now is that we have now???
I like the first one more. With very, very limited exceptions, human versions of cartoon animals(i.e, Pokemon) tend to be a turn off for me.Unless you count Mario from the original Donkey Kong arcade games.
Answer from the artists on Devianart:
View attachment 37526
View attachment 37527
Apes have shorter lifespans than humans, plus plot.thats wierd but how would cranky kong be the original dk but mario doesnt get white mustache now after all these years at same time donkey kong can still see dk jr. while dk jr. now is that we have now???
Meanwhile, DK was a baby at the same time as Mario in the Yoshi games.Apes have shorter lifespans than humans, plus plot.
The other difference that came to my mind was that DK Jr. was flat-out replaced by a new character in Diddy when Rare's redesign for the character was deemed too far from the original, and only got used later on in Tennis when Camelot wasn't sure who owned Diddy. Since K. Rool, there's never been a new villain or enemy group to usurp his role, allowing him to keep the title by default. That's something that I don't think will change anytime soon, especially not if he makes even just one more appearance.A major difference is that DK Jr. comes from a few spinoff arcade titles whereas K. Rool comes from what is wildly considered to be the golden days of the franchise. A more accurate comparison would be to the Zelda franchise, Ganondorf has been absent for many years, disregarding remakes and spinoffs, yet he's still very much the antagonist just as well as the Kremling King.
It's only a matter of time before the Kremling Krew makes a comeback (with high hopes thanks to Retro).