LIQUID12A
Smash Modder
WUS DATAs another awesome villain would say: Weak, weak and pathetic
DA POOR INSECKS R A LITTLE CUNFUSE
-Metal Face
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
WUS DATAs another awesome villain would say: Weak, weak and pathetic
No, that's what most of us thinkFormer Kutthroat posting.
Are you people still spiting every other franchise because they got attention over Donkey Kong? Because I do not want to be discriminated yet again over something so pathetic. Yes I don't think King K. Rool is the only choice and I do like other franchises, is that such a crime?
May I ask you something? Were we at all spitting on other franchises at the moment? Were we? No. We were talking about Christmas and commenting on Bowser K. Rool's art and pictures. We generally had a positive vibe going, but then you came along, and tried throwing that out the window by talking about something completely unrelated to the topic at hand. I generally have to wonder what drove you to post this. None of our recent posts warranted this one, and it's Christmas. How did you suddenly think about us supposedly trashing other franchises?Former Kutthroat posting.
Are you people still spiting every other franchise because they got attention over Donkey Kong? Because I do not want to be discriminated yet again over something so pathetic. Yes I don't think King K. Rool is the only choice and I do like other franchises, is that such a crime?
Clearly someone must have set you off recently to elicit such a post, because from what I've seen in here, most posts on the matter voice discontent over DK's neglect, not the presence of other franchises. Plenty of Kutthroats like both.Former Kutthroat posting.
Are you people still spiting every other franchise because they got attention over Donkey Kong? Because I do not want to be discriminated yet again over something so pathetic. Yes I don't think King K. Rool is the only choice and I do like other franchises, is that such a crime?
I want to post here more often because I actually do like the character and I do have respect for Bkupa666, but I don't want to be associated with scumbags creating bad mojo for other kinds of fans. No rocket science here. It was one of the reasons why I flat out rage quit during the last few months of speculation, because I don't want to be treated like dirt due to some childish jealousy and entitlement.May I ask you something? Were we at all spitting on other franchises at the moment? Were we? No. We were talking about Christmas and commenting on Bowser K. Rool's art and pictures. We generally had a positive vibe going, but then you came along, and tried throwing that out the window by talking about something completely unrelated to the topic at hand. I generally have to wonder what drove you to post this. None of our recent posts warranted this one, and it's Christmas. How did you suddenly think about us supposedly trashing other franchises?
It happened during speculation where people kept saying that only "the big three" matter and anything else does matter and people are stupid for thinking otherwise. That was not a healthy mentality, and ultimately everyone lost. Even after the reveals happened, people still attacked fans of other franchises out of frustration as a scapegoat of sorts. In my case, what broke the straw on the camel's back was a few comments Hoots said.Clearly someone must have set you off recently to elicit such a post, because from what I've seen in here, most posts on the matter voice discontent over DK's neglect, not the presence of other franchises. Plenty of Kutthroats like both.
I can see where you are coming from, and I won't lie, we have had Kutthroats that insult other franchises that we don't call out. I won't call out names, but back when we had this thread shut down, we had a member that dismissed the women added to the game as "everyone's waifus". I honestly wish I called him out on it, as I don't want to be associated with people like that. In the future, we need to hold some standard to behavior on this thread.I want to post here more often because I actually do like the character and I do have respect for Bkupa666, but I don't want to be associated with scumbags creating bad mojo for other kinds of fans. No rocket science here. It was one of the reasons why I flat out rage quit during the last few months of speculation, because I don't want to be treated like dirt due to some childish jealousy and entitlement.
If I'm causing problems, then I do apologize in advance. But in essence I didn't feel comfortable and I really hope those feelings have tide over.
It happened during speculation where people kept saying that only "the big three" matter and anything else does matter and people are stupid for thinking otherwise. That was not a healthy mentality, and ultimately everyone lost. Even after the reveals happened, people still attacked fans of other franchises out of frustration as a scapegoat of sorts. In my case, what broke the straw on the camel's back was a few comments Hoots said.
I don't follow the mentality of reps, since it's inherently flawed due to the subjective nature, but even I'll admit DK content feels off in these games. I would of been perfectly fine if at least the music selection was more flexible, instead of trying to make remixes of Jungle Hijinx with varies genres of music. I can get past stuff like using the jungle levels as a basis for the series, since it's not the only franchise that does a similar mentality, or the character selection being Donkey Kong and Diddy.The mentality of "content from X series took the spot of content from Y series" is flawed because, even though there's a finite amount of development time, content going away from Kid Icarus and Fire Emblem (the popular targets) wouldn't magically become DK content. . .it'd probably get pumped into Mario, Zelda, or Kirby. It's the neglect of DK, period, that deserves attention, not other series' stuff.
K. Rool discussion is vastly preferable to franchise discussion IMO, and yet conversation often circles back to franchises because, for K. Rool (or any DK character) to become DLC, interest would have to be shown in the franchise. Personally, I think moveset discussion needs to be the priority, since there very well could be developer sentiments that K. Rool is a boring Bowser rip-off. We know better and ought to get the message out.
Probably #6. I like both of K.Rool's designs, and although #3 and #8 sound nice, his voice from the DKC cartoon is superior to his other portrayals imo.Copying over a K. Rool poll from GameFAQs of all places that I think could generate some interesting discussion in here:
"If you could guarantee ONE aesthetic feature about K. Rool in Smash, would you choose. . ."
1. Visually, K. Rool is based on his Nintendo/PAON design (King of Swing, Mario Super Sluggers, etc.)
2. Visually, K. Rool is based on his Rare design (DKC1-3, DK64, etc.)
3. K. Rool comes with unique alternate outfits for each persona (Kaptain, Baron, Boxer, Pharaoh)
4. K. Rool's voice is made from soundclips emulating his "honk" noise from DKC1-3
5. K. Rool's voice emulates his voice from DK64
6. K. Rool's voice emulates his voice from the DKC cartoon
7. K. Rool's voice emulates emulating realistic crocodile noises
8. 3 new remixes included: a second Gangplank galleon remix, a Kaptain K. Rool fight remix, and Baron K. Roolenstein remix
I'm quite undecided between options 3, 6 and 8, personally.
It's only a crime if you like Mario, Fire Emblem and Kid Icarus.Former Kutthroat posting.
Are you people still spiting every other franchise because they got attention over Donkey Kong? Because I do not want to be discriminated yet again over something so pathetic. Yes I don't think King K. Rool is the only choice and I do like other franchises, is that such a crime?
if it was one i would definitely want the alternate costumes. also like most here i would want his paon design with a bigger eye and cape, golden cuirass and tail. and for sound dkc cartoon voice definitely, if it were the other voices one would dound like bowser and the other ganondorf, so i would rather a unique villain voiceCopying over a K. Rool poll from GameFAQs of all places that I think could generate some interesting discussion in here:
"If you could guarantee ONE aesthetic feature about K. Rool in Smash, would you choose. . ."
1. Visually, K. Rool is based on his Nintendo/PAON design (King of Swing, Mario Super Sluggers, etc.)
2. Visually, K. Rool is based on his Rare design (DKC1-3, DK64, etc.)
3. K. Rool comes with unique alternate outfits for each persona (Kaptain, Baron, Boxer, Pharaoh)
4. K. Rool's voice is made from soundclips emulating his "honk" noise from DKC1-3
5. K. Rool's voice emulates his voice from DK64
6. K. Rool's voice emulates his voice from the DKC cartoon
7. K. Rool's voice emulates emulating realistic crocodile noises
8. 3 new remixes included: a second Gangplank galleon remix, a Kaptain K. Rool fight remix, and Baron K. Roolenstein remix
I'm quite undecided between options 3, 6 and 8, personally.
I don't think Nintendo really improved on any of Rare's designs, personally.Give me K. Rool's RARE design. While I think Nintendo vastly improved most of RARE's designs, their version of K. Rool is horrible. At least give me his golden underbelly, large crown, tail, and larger cape back.
I really hope you're joking. Like, I really hope you did not mean what you just said.It's only a crime if you like Mario, Fire Emblem and Kid Icarus.
I like Tiny's new design more than the old one. Hell, it even feels like a Rare design, considering Candy, Berri, Krystal, etc.I don't think Nintendo really improved on any of Rare's designs, personally.
I still hate Tiny Kong's redesign.
Wasn't it RARE themselves who redesigned Tiny from DKR DS, or was she a teenager in the Paon games as well?I don't think Nintendo really improved on any of Rare's designs, personally.
I still hate Tiny Kong's redesign.
wait RARE did Krystal?I like Tiny's new design more than the old one. Hell, it even feels like a Rare design, considering Candy, Berri, Krystal, etc.
Though I do prefer Dixie's old design, even though the newer design only lacks the leggings.
And obviously Rare K. Rool is miles better than Paon Rool.
That's a long and old story.wait RARE did Krystal?
I like Retro's design of Dixie the best. Seems much more expressive compared to previous ones. That's the case for all the Kongs really (except Funky, who's kind of the same).I like Tiny's new design more than the old one. Hell, it even feels like a Rare design, considering Candy, Berri, Krystal, etc.
Though I do prefer Dixie's old design, even though the newer design only lacks the leggings.
And obviously Rare K. Rool is miles better than Paon Rool.
I only didn't know about Rare being involved, that reason is good enough, and to think people whined that it was differentThat's a long and old story.
Summary: Rare was making a new game for the N64, Dinosaur Planet, Krystal was the protagonist.
Miyamoto looked at it and said "it looks rike Star Fox, make it that instead." and so after being delayed to the GameCube, Rare's final Nintendo (besides a few handheld titles) game was released. Star Fox Adventures. Rare died after that.
Pretty much the major reason I supported Krystal was to cling to the last piece of Rare that was left behind.
Though I want King K. Rool because I actually played DKC and loved the games and the king. But also Rare.
Fixed with the underlined.That's a long and old story.
Summary: Rare was making a new game for the N64, Dinosaur Planet, Krystal was the secondary protagonist.
Miyamoto looked at it and said "it looks rike Star Fox, make it that instead." and so after being delayed to the GameCube, Rare's final Nintendo (besides a few handheld titles) game was released. Star Fox Adventures. Rare died after that.
Pretty much the major reason I supported Krystal was to cling to the last piece of Rare that was left behind.
Though I want King K. Rool because I actually played DKC and loved the games and the king. But also Rare.
From my understanding she was being redesigned for something else so she had to look like that in DKR, but DKR ended up coming out first.Wasn't it RARE themselves who redesigned Tiny from DKR DS, or was she a teenager in the Paon games as well?
I think they improved Diddy and Dixie at least. Diddy is no longer fat, and Dixie looks less like Diddy now.
I prefer the "I'd love to pinch her cheeks" look to the "some horny weirdos are going to love this" look.I like Tiny's new design more than the old one. Hell, it even feels like a Rare design, considering Candy, Berri, Krystal, etc.
Though I do prefer Dixie's old design, even though the newer design only lacks the leggings.
And obviously Rare K. Rool is miles better than Paon Rool.
I guess bestiality is their thing.I'd love Krystal just because she's the closest thing to a Banjo-Kazooie/Conker character that we'll ever get.
From my understanding she was being redesigned for something else so she had to look like that in DKR, but DKR ended up coming out first.
I prefer the "I'd love to pinch her cheeks" look to the "some horny weirdos are going to love this" look.
In K.Rool's LAABRATORYYYYYI drew up K. Rool in my free time, I don't draw often and it's not in color, but I did my best for it being my first time drawing our King.
I love the way he took the time to have "Evil" printed on his gadget.I drew up K. Rool in my free time, I don't draw often and it's not in color, but I did my best for it being my first time drawing our King.
I'm stuck between 2, 3, 6, and 8Copying over a K. Rool poll from GameFAQs of all places that I think could generate some interesting discussion in here:
"If you could guarantee ONE aesthetic feature about K. Rool in Smash, would you choose. . ."
1. Visually, K. Rool is based on his Nintendo/PAON design (King of Swing, Mario Super Sluggers, etc.)
2. Visually, K. Rool is based on his Rare design (DKC1-3, DK64, etc.)
3. K. Rool comes with unique alternate outfits for each persona (Kaptain, Baron, Boxer, Pharaoh)
4. K. Rool's voice is made from soundclips emulating his "honk" noise from DKC1-3
5. K. Rool's voice emulates his voice from DK64
6. K. Rool's voice emulates his voice from the DKC cartoon
7. K. Rool's voice emulates emulating realistic crocodile noises
8. 3 new remixes included: a second Gangplank galleon remix, a Kaptain K. Rool fight remix, and Baron K. Roolenstein remix
I'm quite undecided between options 3, 6 and 8, personally.
2: Rare's design is the best. 3: Alt-Kostume material. and 5: His voice sounds like a kartoony, pissed, Joseph Stalin which is fitting. I never heard him in the DKC Kartoon though so no komment.Kopying over a K. Rool poll from GameFAQs of all places that I think could generate some interesting discussion in here:
"If you could guarantee ONE aesthetic feature about K. Rool in Smash, would you choose. . ."
1. Visually, K. Rool is based on his Nintendo/PAON design (King of Swing, Mario Super Sluggers, etc.)
2. Visually, K. Rool is based on his Rare design (DKC1-3, DK64, etc.)
3. K. Rool comes with unique alternate outfits for each persona (Kaptain, Baron, Boxer, Pharaoh)
4. K. Rool's voice is made from soundclips emulating his "honk" noise from DKC1-3
5. K. Rool's voice emulates his voice from DK64
6. K. Rool's voice emulates his voice from the DKC kartoon
7. K. Rool's voice emulates emulating realistic krokodile noises
8. 3 new remixes included: a second Gangplank galleon remix, a Kaptain K. Rool fight remix, and Baron K. Roolenstein remix
I'm quite undecided between options 3, 6 and 8, personally.