Fire Emblemier
The Crests are to Blame
So, interesting theme this game has.
Vote Red Ryu
Vote Red Ryu
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Everyone hates RVS, the problem is there's very little other ways to start games. RVS generally means "joke phase" in practice despite standing for random vote stage. Slowly something valuable will come out of it and the RVS stops. It sucks but there really isn't any other reliable way to start the gameRVS is stupid. Explain to me what good comes from it.
![]()
Basically this. It's a common way to start the game whether you like it or not. Personally, D1 is my least favorite day, as there's no true info to gather besides what other players say. All you can really do is add to the content so something is formed for the other days. That isn't to say the D1 isn't important. Cause a correct lynch right out the gate is a game changer. Just as a PR lynch right out could boost the game being lost.Everyone hates RVS, the problem is there's very little other ways to start games. RVS generally means "joke phase" in practice despite standing for random vote stage. Slowly something valuable will come out of it and the RVS stops. It sucks but there really isn't any other reliable way to start the game
VOTE: ZalakThe problem with that.. is his REASONING for voting against you is that RVS is stupid.
But in the end, do you think this can be a valid basis to call someone out for being town or scum?It just seems kind of backwards to implore the VERY SAME RVS tactics FireEmblem used while he is questioning RVS.
What do you hope to gain from this?Absolutely not. I don't think anything that anyone has said so far can be used a valid basis to call someone out as town or scum.
Explain this vote.Vote: Zalak
While this might be true for you, you should have waited to answer this question if this is the case or he knows it is just a pressure vote.I was hoping to see how he reacts to the vote, as he stated earlier there isn't a lot of evidence to call someone out as town or scum.
But he is mining for information, perhaps to help the game along, but my vote stands
He didn't ask and I would like to hold off on that for now over you talking to me a bit since I can get info out of you.You've asked him to explain his vote against me.. but you didn't tell him why you voted against mePretty secretive.. EH, RYU!?
![]()
It happens naturally, usually calling someone out on a scummy action.Out of RvS? But HOW!? We don't really have much information to go off of.
Also, you're being awfully critical of Hunter's actions. I think at this point, everyone knows no one is voting to actually get someone lynched. You're the one who asked him why he voted against me. Did you expect a very different answer? ALSO, it's kind of hypocritical to criticize him for revealing his intentions, and then tell me you intend to get info out of me.