Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Doesn't make any senseThe temperature outside can be determined by counting the chirps made by crickets.
It's true though. I've done it before at school.Doesn't make any sense
Well, there are tons of people with no hair on their head, like people undergoing chemotherapy and some infants, but I don't think that counts.There is a 100% chance that you have there are 2 people in the world that have the exact same number of hairs on their body.
I had two really awesome posts there too.I found the thread, but please don't go posting there because it'll just start up more pointless "actully being vegetarien is halthier" "NO its not red meat rules" conversation, in which people will inevitably skip over all the useful posts already in the thread because they seemed too long and didn't feel like reading them.
http://smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=113760
My awesome posts:
http://smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=2854382&postcount=54
http://smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=2861782&postcount=62
No way a rod of steel could do that, because it's not elastic.Yeah, spider silk has roughly the same tensile strength as high-grade steel, but it is much lighter than steel.
That means that if, in fact, a pencil-thick strand of spider silk could stop a jet plane, a pencil-thick rod of steel could also. I don't know if that's true or not; it seems a little extreme, but I don't really know.
Ah, interesting point. Spider silk is very ductile: it can stretch about 40% without breaking. Steel, much less so (although it's a lot more ductile than many things, like glass or whatever).No way a rod of steel could do that, because it's not elastic.
Well yeah but think about it.Ah, interesting point. Spider silk is very ductile: it can stretch about 40% without breaking. Steel, much less so (although it's a lot more ductile than many things, like glass or whatever).
But, if I remember correctly, ductility has nothing to do with tensile strength. I'm not sure on that, though.
We already produce materials that are stronger than spider silk. Para-aramids, such as Kevlar and Twaron, are over twice as strong as spider silk.We can expect some enourmous leaps in technology when we figure out nanotechnics (the use of fullerene for example) and how to produce a material like spider silk synthetically.
Well you should know that wikipedia is not a reliable source for information.I don't get it, fluffy. Please explain.
Allright, you're probably correct then if that's the case. I messed up with the take-off stuff in my mind.Jet engines don't accelerate very quickly. They build up thrust as they spin up to speed. There wouldn't be any "jerking" to snap the steel. Remember, this is keeping a plane from taking off, not stopping it in mid-air or something.
I'm almost positive that tensile strength and ductility are two separated variables of a material.
Both spider silk and high-grade steel have a tensile strength of about 1.3 GPa, I believe. When you put them under that stress, the steel stretches about 1% of its initial length, and the spider silk stretches 40% of its initial length.
As you add tension, they both snap at roughly the same time.
At least I think this is how it works. I'm just working from the knowledge I gleaned from skimming my physics book.
Yes of course. However, Kevlar isn't all that light as far as I know (might be wrong though), but at least it isn't easy and cheap to produce, unlike nanotechnical stuff once we figure it out. Could've mentioned that in my post. Also, even though para-aramids are very strong, they aren't nearly as elastic as spider silk.We already produce materials that are stronger than spider silk. Para-aramids, such as Kevlar and Twaron, are over twice as strong as spider silk.
The problem is, those materials are produced under pressure, high heat, and with some crazy chemicals. Spiders make spider silk at atmospheric pressure, room temperature, and with water as the solvent. So, we are still trying to learn things from the spiders to help as manufacture hyper-strong materials cheaply and easily.
It basically uses the Pigeonhole principle. Since its obvious no person on the planet has more than 6 billion hairs, and there are more than 6 billion people in the world, at least 2 people would have the same amount of hairs.Well, there are tons of people with no hair on their head, like people undergoing chemotherapy and some infants, but I don't think that counts.
If you grow hairs one by one, eventually somebody is going to catch up to another in terms of number of hairs.
But there is still a small chance that that won't happen. So I don't see how it's 100%. Just very, extremely, likely. And not that surprising.
lol well i try to make them simple : (Ah, I get it now.
Wikipedia/Wikipedia, calling Wikipedia Wikipediaish (not reliable).
FACT: Fluffy makes perfectly good jokes that people who think they're smart (like me and AltF4) don't understand.
Interestingly enough, scientists have been able to produce spiders silk in labs. they inject spiders genes into mammals (i,e, cows, hamsters or goats) and silk is produced and harvested from the milk. However, this manufactured silk is just a bit short of the real thing, weaker but more elastic. Still, it looks like a promising field.We already produce materials that are stronger than spider silk. Para-aramids, such as Kevlar and Twaron, are over twice as strong as spider silk.
The problem is, those materials are produced under pressure, high heat, and with some crazy chemicals. Spiders make spider silk at atmospheric pressure, room temperature, and with water as the solvent. So, we are still trying to learn things from the spiders to help as manufacture hyper-strong materials cheaply and easily.
Touché. You're totally right.It basically uses the Pigeonhole principle. Since its obvious no person on the planet has more than 6 billion hairs, and there are more than 6 billion people in the world, at least 2 people would have the same amount of hairs.
answer my PM!An apple, potato, and onion all taste the same if you eat them with your nose plugged.
Faalse. Instead, if you had no sense of taste, you'd probably have a little difficulties telling which one is which.An apple, potato, and onion all taste the same if you eat them with your nose plugged.
Somewhat True.An apple, potato, and onion all taste the same if you eat them with your nose plugged.
I'll try to address some of the others later, but I just want to get this one out of the way...Faalse. Instead, if you had no sense of taste, you'd probably have a little difficulties telling which one is which.
I posted this one earlier.A single cup of gasoline, when ignited, has the same explosive power as five sticks of dynamite.
It's not as clear-cut as that, though.About 60% of taste is actually a result of smell. So in other words, plugging your nose would make it harder to taste each flavor.
It can most definitely be assigned approximate percentages.It's not as clear-cut as that, though.
Your tongue tastes sweetness, bitterness, sourness, and saltiness. If apples, onions, and potatoes have the same amount of those four things, you couldn't tell them apart.
Your nose has hundreds or millions of different receptors (sorry--I don't really know) that latch onto certain chemical compounds. Your nose is great for identifying things because it can tell many, many substances apart by their chemical signatures.
Your nose and your tongue (or rather, taste buds in general) do very different things. It's not as simple as a 60/40 split.
Sure, that wasn't really anything new, but I'm 100% positive that you could tell an apple, an onion and a potato apart night and day, no matter if you held your nose or not. Believe me, our lunches are served by the schools, and not all the portions are that gourmet. Back in primary school it was a quite common trick to hold your nose while trying to sip all the "summer-soup" as we call it.It can most definitely be assigned approximate percentages.
You're right about the nose and tongue doing different things; the tongue can tell the difference between the five different basic types of tastes (salt, bitter, sweet, sour, umami), but it's the nose and its ability to detect aromas that add flavor to what you "taste". Also, I believe there are about 40 million olfactory receptors in the human nose. We have about 1100 different types of olfactory receptors and can detect 5000-10000 different smells.
Numbers for how much of taste is a result of smell vary, but here's what the following have to say:
Karen Kalumuck, a biologist at San Francisco's Exploratorium, says 75%.
Doctors specializing in the field said that about 80% of all taste disorders are actually smell disorders, in an article on emedicine; that's definitely saying something.
UConn Health Center's Taste and Smell Center, one of the country's few centers specializing in the area, says that taste is about 75% smell.
Harvard's Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary also says most taste disorders are caused by problems with smelling.
So in fact, yes, you can put a number on it, and mine was too low. Taste is actually about 3/4 smell, not 60% like I said earlier.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2006/0608-why_i_hate_anchovies.htm
http://www.emedicine.com/ent/topic333.htm
http://www.uchc.edu/uconntasteandsmell/gen.html
http://www.meei.harvard.edu/patient/tasteandsmell.php
http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/nosek.html
http://senselab.med.yale.edu/ordb/default.asp
http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Bra...7-4789-AEDA-E60F3211E0CB/0/9_01_lecture33.pdf
To the post on about the 5th page or 6th
During the winter The Earth is actually closer to the sun than during the summer. I can't remeber the exact distance but its about 6 million miles apart from the summer distance to the winter distance. i think.