- Joined
- Sep 6, 2010
- Messages
- 3,655
- NNID
- WarioLand
That's not even comparable. Or are you saying polls are the same as a tournament?I guess Smash tournaments are also BS, then.
Are you honestly saying a poll voted by non-fans who only played/started with gen 1 or 2 would hold accurate results? Ignoring children (THE target audience), competitive battlers and long time fans (who tore apart the poll, as I stated before) who have no reason to be or vote in IGN for respective reasons? Yeah.On another point, it is not at all surprising that the most popular Pokemon are typically of Gen 1 and 2. Think about who took the poll. I'd bet most of them were children during the rise of the Pokemon franchise. Yet another point to consider is that Generation 1 Pokemon are the most recognizable to non-Pokemon fans.
Also the non-Pokemon fans statement is BS. Do you have any evidence to back that up? Don't you mean adults who played Pokemon before or are familiar with it? Pikachu is pretty much the only gen 1 Pokemon being marketed today. Lucario IS hugely iconic today, not Pikachu-levels but to the point where most people (particularly children) are familiar with him.
What complaint? That Lucario didn't end up in the list? I never said that.Anyway, your complaint is ill-founded to begin with. Lucario himself ranks 32 on the list, and this is the exact quote they used for his entry:
I still haven't seen anything that suggests that Mewtwo and Charizard are more well-known and popular, but I'm not denying their popularity either. All I'm saying is that it's not far-fetched to think he's as popular if not more, and you're pretty delusional (and probably biased) if you deny that. This is the only place where I've seen people deny it, which actually surprised me.Lucario is certainly popular, but he's not more popular, which is the point of yours that I am refuting.