PitchD
Smash Apprentice
Idaho Power Rankings
Ok this is just me posting a template for what Idaho's PR should be since I think this shouldn't be discussed in the Idaho thread.
This was originally thought of by Timmy and passed down to Knuttz with some tweaks.
We've been talking too long about when we're going to do this so I wanted to open this template up to discussion.
Important Notice:
QAny inclusion of off-topic, "flaming", "spam", or otherwise non-proactive posts will be flagged and reported to a moderator.
Since the PR List is under development, we must establish the foundations:
1. Administrator
2. Panelists (3)
3. Mission Statement
4. PR Criteria
1. Administrator
The administrator must be respected in the community, and it can be a panel member.
2. Panelists
As per Regional/State PR Regulations, we are required to have a minimum of three (3) panelists. Volunteers for this position are currently open to anyone with knowledge and experience of SSB who are currently residing in the state of Idaho. Panelists will be chosen by general acceptance of the Idaho Smash Community, and, if necessary, by majority vote.
3. Mission Statement
I have provided a Mission Statement. Any addendum or amendment is up for discussion within this thread and is subject to approval by Panelists and Regional Administrator.
4. PR Criteria
A preliminary criteria for placement within the Power Ranking is included in the Mission Statement. Changes and additions are up for discussion within this thread and is subject to approval by Panelists and Regional Administrator.
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
Mission Statement
Need mission statement
Administrator - Open
Panelists
1. Position Currently Open
2. Position Currently Open
3. Position Currently Open
Power Rankings will be posted after Panelists have been chosen and rankings have been decided.
-------------------------------------
My input...(QraQ)
1. Administrator...
Should be Buzz since he networks the most throughout different states and what not
2. Panelists..
1. QraQ (myself (Dom)) -Because of my experience
2. Buzz -Cause he is well known and can network quite well
3. Either Knuttz or Gnosis because they share the same traits just on different spectrums.
3. Mission Statement.
To keep a fair competition among Idaho smashers and to establish a means of placing within our community.
(Knuttz)
Now...about the criteria. I believe a point system should be in order to a top 5 or 7. Lets say we do a top 7. The point system should be 7 points for 1st and 1 point for 7th. The reason for the point system will be for 3 categories based on rankings.
1. The Ladder.
If we use a ladder system for some point rankings, it will increase competitiveness, with the first defending his title, and the others trying to take it. We should make a rule you cannot go up more than two spots on the ladder. (thus if lets say the 7th is not active for a month, things still can change). The hardest part is starting the ladder.
QraQ's Input: I don't think adding more competition is really as important as perfecting our existing competition. Could create unwanted drama, but I left it there to let Idaho decide.
2. Tournament Rankings.
This point system is bases on tournament rankings IN THE PAST 6 months. Only in the past 6 months will take someone who has lost their edge off the rankings, like they should be. The exact method is currently unknown to me, still a gray area. Still will be based on who they played, who they beat, etc.
3. Overall Skill-Personal Vote.
This is the 3rd and final vote of who is the best. This will take in account of friendlies, tourney, MM ,etc. I know in friendlies people do screw around and try new things and never look their best. But the panelists should know who is the best. Because we are a small community, this can work out.
-------------
(Knuttz)
Now, if I were on the panel, here would be my rankings. My tourney results are based on both the utah and the little 8 person tourney we held for rankings...
Ladder: (predetermined) ------ Tournament Rankings:------- Personal Vote:
1. Qraq -----------------------1.Qraq ----------------------- 1. Qraq
2. BC ----------------------- 2. BC ----------------------- 2. BC
3. Josh ----------------------- 3. Josh ----------------------- 3. Josh
4. Knuttz ----------------------- 4. Knuttz ----------------------- 4. Buzz
5. Buzz ----------------------- 5. Buzz ----------------------- 5. knuttz
6. Lemon ----------------------- 6. Kinx ----------------------- 6. lemon
7. Kinx ----------------------- 7. Lemon ----------------------- 7. Kinx
Total Points:
1. Qraq 7 + 7 + 7 = 21pts.
2. BC 6 + 6 + 6 = 18 pts.
3. Josh 5 + 5 + 5 = 15 pts.
4. knuttz 4 + 4 + 3 = 11 pts.
5. buzz 3 + 3 + 4 = 10 pts.
6. Lemon 2 + 1 + 2 = 5 pts.
7. Kinx 1 + 2 + 1 = 4 pts.
Now remember this thread is primarily to establish a PR and not to argue about it. Everyone respect one another's opinion so we can actually post a fair and just PR thread.
-QraQ
Ok this is just me posting a template for what Idaho's PR should be since I think this shouldn't be discussed in the Idaho thread.
This was originally thought of by Timmy and passed down to Knuttz with some tweaks.
We've been talking too long about when we're going to do this so I wanted to open this template up to discussion.
Important Notice:
QAny inclusion of off-topic, "flaming", "spam", or otherwise non-proactive posts will be flagged and reported to a moderator.
Since the PR List is under development, we must establish the foundations:
1. Administrator
2. Panelists (3)
3. Mission Statement
4. PR Criteria
1. Administrator
The administrator must be respected in the community, and it can be a panel member.
2. Panelists
As per Regional/State PR Regulations, we are required to have a minimum of three (3) panelists. Volunteers for this position are currently open to anyone with knowledge and experience of SSB who are currently residing in the state of Idaho. Panelists will be chosen by general acceptance of the Idaho Smash Community, and, if necessary, by majority vote.
3. Mission Statement
I have provided a Mission Statement. Any addendum or amendment is up for discussion within this thread and is subject to approval by Panelists and Regional Administrator.
4. PR Criteria
A preliminary criteria for placement within the Power Ranking is included in the Mission Statement. Changes and additions are up for discussion within this thread and is subject to approval by Panelists and Regional Administrator.
__________________________________________________ ___________________________________
Mission Statement
Need mission statement
Administrator - Open
Panelists
1. Position Currently Open
2. Position Currently Open
3. Position Currently Open
Power Rankings will be posted after Panelists have been chosen and rankings have been decided.
-------------------------------------
My input...(QraQ)
1. Administrator...
Should be Buzz since he networks the most throughout different states and what not
2. Panelists..
1. QraQ (myself (Dom)) -Because of my experience
2. Buzz -Cause he is well known and can network quite well
3. Either Knuttz or Gnosis because they share the same traits just on different spectrums.
3. Mission Statement.
To keep a fair competition among Idaho smashers and to establish a means of placing within our community.
(Knuttz)
Now...about the criteria. I believe a point system should be in order to a top 5 or 7. Lets say we do a top 7. The point system should be 7 points for 1st and 1 point for 7th. The reason for the point system will be for 3 categories based on rankings.
1. The Ladder.
If we use a ladder system for some point rankings, it will increase competitiveness, with the first defending his title, and the others trying to take it. We should make a rule you cannot go up more than two spots on the ladder. (thus if lets say the 7th is not active for a month, things still can change). The hardest part is starting the ladder.
QraQ's Input: I don't think adding more competition is really as important as perfecting our existing competition. Could create unwanted drama, but I left it there to let Idaho decide.
2. Tournament Rankings.
This point system is bases on tournament rankings IN THE PAST 6 months. Only in the past 6 months will take someone who has lost their edge off the rankings, like they should be. The exact method is currently unknown to me, still a gray area. Still will be based on who they played, who they beat, etc.
3. Overall Skill-Personal Vote.
This is the 3rd and final vote of who is the best. This will take in account of friendlies, tourney, MM ,etc. I know in friendlies people do screw around and try new things and never look their best. But the panelists should know who is the best. Because we are a small community, this can work out.
-------------
(Knuttz)
Now, if I were on the panel, here would be my rankings. My tourney results are based on both the utah and the little 8 person tourney we held for rankings...
Ladder: (predetermined) ------ Tournament Rankings:------- Personal Vote:
1. Qraq -----------------------1.Qraq ----------------------- 1. Qraq
2. BC ----------------------- 2. BC ----------------------- 2. BC
3. Josh ----------------------- 3. Josh ----------------------- 3. Josh
4. Knuttz ----------------------- 4. Knuttz ----------------------- 4. Buzz
5. Buzz ----------------------- 5. Buzz ----------------------- 5. knuttz
6. Lemon ----------------------- 6. Kinx ----------------------- 6. lemon
7. Kinx ----------------------- 7. Lemon ----------------------- 7. Kinx
Total Points:
1. Qraq 7 + 7 + 7 = 21pts.
2. BC 6 + 6 + 6 = 18 pts.
3. Josh 5 + 5 + 5 = 15 pts.
4. knuttz 4 + 4 + 3 = 11 pts.
5. buzz 3 + 3 + 4 = 10 pts.
6. Lemon 2 + 1 + 2 = 5 pts.
7. Kinx 1 + 2 + 1 = 4 pts.
Now remember this thread is primarily to establish a PR and not to argue about it. Everyone respect one another's opinion so we can actually post a fair and just PR thread.
-QraQ