BluePikmin11
Akko is my dear daughter!
If you guys are going to be negative to Calico, then you might as well keep it to yourself.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Eh he spoke too soon. I only had about 8 characters up at the time.Incredible work, didn't think our PM would lead to this. :O
Hey at least he worked hard on these. You have to appreciate that.
Thanks man. It's my post count dude. I get this treatment every time I'm "new" to a forum. Little do they know I've been lurking for years and a Smash veteran xDIf you guys are going to be negative to Calico, then you might as well keep it to yourself.
You literally said Cuccos star in Zelda. No they don't. That is a fact. Characters like Tingle have their own games. Just because my name has to do with Pokemon doesn't mean I want thousands of Pokemon in Smash. I love the Pokemon franchise, that doesn't mean anything Pokemon I worship. And why would I be jealous of characters I don't think should be in Smash. I hate none of these characters, hell I love Cuccos in Zelda, but a lot of them have no place or reason in Smash. I'm leaving this because you don't see the fault in your logic and I don't think you ever will.Nice opinions and excuses to validate your own logic.
You know with someone with a name like yours you do have a ton of hate for the thread.
Ironic considering my Pokemon Trainers idea was the most fleshed out and included 18 extra Pokemon in one slot plus 3 Pokemon stages including a Pokken Tournament stage.
Leave the Cuccos alone buddy. I'm sensing either some jealousy or personal hate here....
"Thousands of Pokemon"You literally said Cuccos star in Zelda. No they don't. That is a fact. Characters like Tingle have their own games. Just because my name has to do with Pokemon doesn't mean I want thousands of Pokemon in Smash. I love the Pokemon franchise, that doesn't mean anything Pokemon I worship. And why would I be jealous of characters I don't think should be in Smash. I hate none of these characters, hell I love Cuccos in Zelda, but a lot of them have no place or reason in Smash. I'm leaving this because you don't see the fault in your logic and I don't think you ever will.
Did even you read it? I provided reasons and a few facts. Or let me guess, you were expecting the same 10 unispired characters that you hear on repeat? If so then go read the millions of posts about them. You might find Waluigi and Wolf in there.Is this thread serious...
No, these are all just really wierd suggestions.Did even you read it? I provided reasons and a few facts. Or let me guess, you were expecting the same 10 unispired characters that you hear on repeat? If so then go read the millions of posts about them. You might find Waluigi and Wolf in there.
Something to get the uncreative mad: Did you know Rabbids are now more popular than Rayman? More people now recognize the Rabbids than the limb-less fellow. Go cry now :'(
OMG I just thought of a bad a** moveset and stage for Hippie.
If your looking for important characters that are rarely spoken about, may I nominate Dark Matter (The floating eyeball in my signature) from Kirby? The character's the closest thing the series has to a main antagonist outside King Dedede (and you could argue it's more of a antagonist than him too but that's debatable) and I honestly think the character's pretty important. It's your decision though .So what characters are important but rarely mentioned?
Did I miss any viable character alternates?
Oh believe me I don't like Ubisoft either. Not sure what "wrong" they did but Rabbids was a massive hit. These guys are in books and have a TV show now. This is good for them. The creator himself loves Nintendo and did a great job, he was actually protesting the Rayman Legends Wii U delay and I think he left Ubisoft(Need to verify) over it.Ubisoft had created a monster and they should have realized what they've done was wrong in the past. But they are the same guys who can't come up with a valuable excuse for not having female playable characters in Assassin's Creed.
And no, I will never love those bunnies (as charming as they are) more than Rayman. Not against the idea of them in Smash, but I still haven't gotten over what happened since their debut.
Oh cool I'd love to hear them! It's surprise characters that get me the most excited. I can't stand hearing the b****ing and moaning over the same 10 characters over and over....No, these are all just really wierd suggestions.
I do agree with like, 2 but some are just really silly. I've seen other obscure characters that work better.
Hmmm... Nice nominee. My only concern would be how recognizable he'd be in public for example, or how important he is to Nintendo history. When and how often does Dark Matter appear?(Sorry I haven't played many Kirby games but I'll take your word for it)If your looking for important characters that are rarely spoken about, may I nominate Dark Matter (The floating eyeball in my signature) from Kirby? The character's the closest thing the series has to a main antagonist outside King Dedede (and you could argue it's more of a antagonist than him too but that's debatable) and I honestly think the character's pretty important. It's your decision though .
To be fair, Luigi's Mansion sold 5 million.I don't miss any of these characters. Except for maybe e. gadd
Thread should be renamed "characters no one cared about enough to remember"
The difference is, no one bought The Legend of Zelda because "OMG cucckkos I so need that game NOW!!!"
New Zelda game with chickens? I, and 99% of everyone else, couldn't give a ****.
New Zelda game starring Midna? I'd be ecstatic.