I wish more people use 1964, rather than PJ64

[leviathan_]

It runs much faster for me -.- Everyone hogs the olden Project64 k

 

[SuPeRbOoM]

its big and purple

 

[TJK1997]

Agree with boom

 

[Thino]

Its just more popular

 

[dwp171]

can it play online?

 

[leviathan_]

Yes, 1964 plays online as equally well as PJ64k does. Plus, it's much faster. That's a fact.

EDIT: PJ64 is more popular, I see; and that is despite the fact that, standalone, PJ64k is very weak. Then let's get the word out about 1964. >_> I can't believe this.

 

[hebrewhammer]

Fúck that. If your computer is too shítty to play pj64k you should upgrade that shít anyway.

 

[DreDay]

1964 is only good for playing certain games and playing offline.

Besides if your ping is 70-109 your bound to get some lag even if you do have a good comp.

 

[SmashThugZ]

You can't really ask 50+ people to change emulators just because you feel 1964 is better
Perhaps you should try using Project64 instead

 

[TJK1997]

Did you say Project 64 IS WEAK!**** YOU

 

[JaimeHR]

If we were going to change emulators I would rather prefer the Japanese Nemu64 more than 1964

 

[hebrewhammer]

If we were going to change emulators I would rather prefer the Japanese Nemu64 more than 1964

With rice video or something, yea.

 

[Zantetsu]

I Wouldnt Mind Switching. Because I Have A Friend That Can Only Play 1964. PJ64k Just Dosent Work And He Wants To Play Smash Online SOOOOOOOOOOO Bad. Maybe U Could Buy A Server For 1964 Only And Maybe Alot Will Come...

 

[Thino]

Buying and setting up a server is a bit harder than it sounds.

 

[JaimeHR]

Yes, 1964 plays online as equally well as PJ64k does. Plus, it's much faster. That's a fact.

EDIT: PJ64 is more popular, I see; and that is despite the fact that, standalone, PJ64k is very weak. Then let's get the word out about 1964. >_> I can't believe this.

I just gave it a try and it doesn't play online as equal as PJ64k.

Pros

1.-Runs some games offline faster than PJ64k.

Cons

1.- lots of delay, how we can fix this?

2.- some graphics issues with the default video plug-in, any suggestions for a better one?

3.- not as easy to set up as PJ64k


PJ64k > 1964

end