How the hell is this a good reason?
"This tactic gimps my character!" - Yes, and? There are plenty of combos and chaingrabs that complete gimp certain characters. NTSC Sheik alone pretty much shaped the entire Low Tier Tier List of Melee (the PAL Tier List is undoubtedly a bit different since she can't chaingrab anyone in it).
No, this is just johning. If you want to win, then don't pick a character against whom there's a horrible, horrible matchup. It's like picking Pichu in Melee and forbidding people from using Upsmashes because he dies at, like, 70% from Fox's Upsmash.
I meant that this would be a good indication that Ness would be completely worthless in the competetive scene. If you find people still able to use Ness and do well then where is your grounding for looking to ban it in the first place? He might have been bumped down the tiers but he still has a (small) chance in a competetive match. If a complete idiot can truly beat an experienced Ness just be learning how to infinite, he has NO chance at all.
People have been running around yelling that Ness is "unplayable" now. I may be wrong but I take this to mean that even a drastic difference in skill between the two players will be disregarded by the technique in question.
If this proves true then there may be reasoning to start appealing for a ban.
I may be slightly ignorant on the subject but was there an incredibly simple technique a melee newcomer could learn and be able to take out a bowser or mewtwo of note?
There is a difference between lower tier and complete uselessness.
To sum it up-
I was not stating that that was grounds for a ban on its own, merely grounds to start looking for a ban.
If Ness is now low tier but still usable in some sense of the word, I dont think a ban is necessary.
If Ness is now so weak that any novice can beat an experienced Nesser.. There may be a problem.
God, I find myself re-reading every post 4-5 times before I hit "submit reply."
Even the slightest mis-wording will have people jumping on you left and right <_<
Ah well. 'Tis good for me as a writer, I suppose.