BronzeGreekGod
Smash Lord
- Joined
- May 26, 2012
- Messages
- 1,638
Lol wel I hope he gets in just so u guys can be upset
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That's kind of a douchey thing to sayLol wel I hope he gets in just so u guys can be upset
Lol I'm just being a d***That's kind of a douchey thing to say
Good thing I won't be upset then, eh?
There's just one little problem however...Third parties like Snake, Sonic and Cloud have already ruined the purity of Smash. There's a large support for a guy who hangs with Disney movie characters. The Pokémon anime is bigger in pop culture than the Pokémon games but that didn't stop Pokémon from being the most over represented series in Smash. Lucario appeared in the eighth Pokémon movie two years before Diamond and Pearl. ROB was actually a toy. Smash is a mash-up of characters that would not fit the same universe. Kirby and Snake? Samus and Ike? Wii Fit Trainer and Mr. Game & Watch? In fact, the 2-Dimensional Mr. Game & Watch looks really weird next to the 3D cast. And the Dragon Ball fighting games are rising in popularity. So Goku would fit in perfectly in Smash.
Who cares? That's such an arbitrary argument. When has Sakurai explicitly said "only video game characters"? And even f he did the guy changes his mind every moment he breaths.There's just one little problem however...
Goku isn't a video game character
Plenty of quotes out there suggesting he's only looking at video game characters.Who cares? That's such an arbitrary argument. When has Sakurai explicitly said "only video game characters"? And even f he did the guy changes his mind every moment he breaths.
It literally is a good argument lol. He's broken every "rule" he's ever come up withPlenty of quotes out there suggesting he's only looking at video game characters.
Besides it was even written on the ballot.
Also that whole "changes his mind" argument is really not a good argument
What are these rules you speak of?It literally is a good argument lol. He's broken every "rule" he's ever come up with
Uhh, no 3rd party characters, he's said each smash would be his last since melee, too many characters would create repetitive movesets, ridley is too big... shall I go on?What are these rules you speak of?
That was never a rule. Even the fact that Snake was suppossed to be in melee but couldn't due to the game being to far in development proves that there never was a "3rd party rule"Uhh, no 3rd party characters, ?
Little did Sakurai know that the demand for a new smash was high. Also it was Nintendo that suggested a new smash game to Sakurai.he's said each smash would be his last since melee,
What?too many characters would create repetitive movesets?
That never was a rule. The reason Ridley never made it in before was due Sakurai not knowing how to implement him well with his size. Looks like he figured it out as of june 12th.ridley is too big... shall I go on?
Upset? No. That implies I care enough about Goku to really dislike him.Let me ask this.. would anyone here actually be UPSET if Goku was in?
Seriously. Frankly if any Goku supporter doesn't think Spider-Man or TMNT or Mickey Mouse deserve to be in as well, then they are trolls. Every argument for Goku not only favors those as well, but favors them more than Goku.Upset? No. That implies I care enough about Goku to really dislike him.
Disapointed, dumbfounded, and confused? yes. Totally.
Now let me ask the people who WANT Goku something.
Most of the arguments I've seen for Goku say things like, he's iconic, he defineed his genre, he appears in lots of games ...
Would you be okay is INSTEAD of Goku we got Sailor Moon, Spider-man, Optimus Prime, Sherlock Holmes, The Ninja Turtles, Indiana Jones, or Barbie? If not, then why?
This line of thinking is dangerous. People don't think of the repercussions of character inclusions like Goku. I can only hope Sakurai agrees with that sentiment.Who cares? That's such an arbitrary argument. When has Sakurai explicitly said "only video game characters"? And even f he did the guy changes his mind every moment he breaths.
I'd go so far as to say that Ronald McDonald belongs in Smash bros more than Goku. McDonald's has done some huge promotions for Nintendo and Ronald and Mario have appeared in commercials together.Seriously. Frankly if any Goku supporter doesn't think Spider-Man or TMNT or Mickey Mouse deserve to be in as well, then they are trolls. Every argument for Goku not only favors those as well, but favors them more than Goku.
Giving hardcore dragon ball fans a reason to own a nintendo console, I guessWhat's Goku ever done for Nintendo?
I mean, I'm not saying that any popular genre-defining character can get in. They have to have highly significant games on top of that. Popularity outside of games is just a bonus.I feel that still leaves the flood gates open far too wide.
The Terminator defined his genre, had games across multiple generations yada yada yada. Same for Indian Jones, Sherlock Holmes, Big Bird.
I'd say that it doesn't matter if they defined their own genre or how big their fan base is. I'd limit the licensed to characters that have had a major impact on videogames, Nintendo in particular. Goku has had a lot of games, sure, but I don't feel he's every felt like he ever made a huge impact on the game scene. Frankly, a huge majority of the games he has been in on Nintendo systems have been horrible and quickly forgotten. I'd say james Bond, Turok, or the Ninja Turtles have far more of a right to be in Smash than Goku does.
I'm kind of playing Devil's Advocate here since I don't personally care for him either way, but I'd answer that those characters would be fine as long as they had a largely significant game. Spider-Man I'd say comes the closest of that group. Spider-Man 2 on Gamecube was a great game, on top of him being a constant in Marvel vs Capcom, which is a huge franchise for the fighting game community.Now let me ask the people who WANT Goku something.
Most of the arguments I've seen for Goku say things like, he's iconic, he defineed his genre, he appears in lots of games ...
Would you be okay is INSTEAD of Goku we got Sailor Moon, Spider-man, Optimus Prime, Sherlock Holmes, The Ninja Turtles, Indiana Jones, or Barbie? If not, then why?
Goku is literally the ambasador of Japan. Literally. He's japan's icon. Nintendo is a Japanese company. So it makes sense for Goku more than other characters from other IPs. Goku is also part of the most popular anime to ever exist, so again, he defines all of anime. Sailor moon is no where near gokus legend status.Upset? No. That implies I care enough about Goku to really dislike him.
Disapointed, dumbfounded, and confused? yes. Totally.
Now let me ask the people who WANT Goku something.
Most of the arguments I've seen for Goku say things like, he's iconic, he defineed his genre, he appears in lots of games ...
Would you be okay is INSTEAD of Goku we got Sailor Moon, Spider-man, Optimus Prime, Sherlock Holmes, The Ninja Turtles, Indiana Jones, or Barbie? If not, then why?
Funimation has no saying in Goku being in Smash at all. They aren't allowed to make the decisions for Shueisha. Funimation is just a distributor of Dragon Ball in the west.Now let's also go to the logistic part of things. Funimation already has teased stuff about Goku in smash. They've made it clear they're down to get him in there.
That's not how licensing works. We would've gotten him already in smash 4 if it were that easy. Konami has the rights for Yugi-oh, why isn't there support for yugi?Furthermore, bandai who's worked on smash is the game company that has Goku licensing.
Are you seriously comparing YUGI to GOKU? What mushrooms are you on? YUGI??? YUGIIIIIII????? I'm so offended right now. Yugio sucks a bag of horse poo. You lose all future arguments from now on.Funimation has no saying in Goku being in Smash at all. They aren't allowed to make the decisions for Shueisha. Funimation is just a distributor of Dragon Ball in the west.
That's not how licensing works. We would've gotten him already in smash 4 if it were that easy. Konami has the rights for Yugi-oh, why isn't there support for yugi?
Now you're just acting childishAre you seriously comparing YUGI to GOKU? What mushrooms are you on? YUGI??? YUGIIIIIII????? I'm so offended right now. Yugio sucks a bag of horse poo. You lose all future arguments from now on.
I digress.. no one likes Yugio, that's why they dont want Yugi in smash.
And I'm more than 100 percent certain that dealing with konami was already hard enough. Those guys are grade a a**holes.
And I'm not saying licensing is easy, but since Goku is with Bandai, it's certainly a lot more possible to do than a number of other characters, plus Goku is actually popular.
That's the worst mispelling off Godzilla I have ever seen.Goku is literally the ambasador of Japan. Literally. He's japan's icon.
By that arguement, Captain Crunch fits into the Avengers. After all they are from the same country.Nintendo is a Japanese company. So it makes sense for Goku more than other characters from other IPs.
Pretty much, yeah.While I'd actually love spiderman in smash, does he really define all of marvel?
Let me argue that on your level. Goku sucks. He has sucked more than anything that has sucked before. As a character he is horribly bland and for a move set, he's got the most generic attacks you could think of.Optimis prime.. transformers sucks lol. It's sucked for years. And it was originally created as a show just to sell toys. Also wtf would his moveset be? Having a viable,iconic moveset is highly important not just how much of an icon the character is.
Yes. I would compare them. The Ninja Turtles at the height of their popularity were easily the equal of anything DB has ever done and they have had far more highly acclaimed games on Nintendo. Is this more of your "they suck because they're not Japanese" biase?Ninja Turtles would be awesome, but they're just not important enough. You really gona compare ninja turtles to Goku?
People want Shrek for Smash.And bottom line is, people want Goku. Do people want all your mentioned characters? There's a reason people want Goku. Whatever the reason is, he's popular.
I shouldn't need to correct you on this one but I mustAs for some memey characters like Mickey Mouse.. he is not portrayed as a fighter. Yes, he has "fighting" experience, but that's not his iconic position. (Keyblade Master Mickey would be .
Gah quoting everything is so hard. I'm on my phone.That's the worst mispelling off Godzilla I have ever seen.
By that arguement, Captain Crunch fits into the Avengers. After all they are from the same country.
Pretty much, yeah.
Let me argue that on your level. Goku sucks. He has sucked more than anything that has sucked before. As a character he is horribly bland and for a move set, he's got the most generic attacks you could think of.
Yes. I would compare them. The Ninja Turtles at the height of their popularity were easily the equal of anything DB has ever done and they have had far more highly acclaimed games on Nintendo. Is this more of your "they suck because they're not Japanese" biase?
People want Shrek for Smash.
There was a huge online petition to get Britney Spears into Smash.
People can be stupid and they aren't always worth listening to.
Nah man, that's just your bias showingGodzilla: you know Goku was the ambassador of the Japan Olympics right?
I learned something today.Godzilla was a cultural ambassador of Japan
Also...
Remind me again who has a star on the hollywood walk of fame? Not Goku
Godzilla is a much, much more bigger icon than goku wil ever be
Uhh.. Goku being the ambassador of the Olympics is my bias? LolNah man, that's just your bias showing
Godzilla was a cultural ambassador of Japan
Also...
Remind me again who has a star on the hollywood walk of fame? Not Goku
Godzilla is a much, much more bigger icon than goku wil ever be
Well yeahI learned something today.
I really really really doubt it, which is a large part of why the Goku support is annoying. I don't believe Goku Supporters think Goku is good for Smash, just that Smash would be good for Goku. Mario or Superman in Jump Force would be bad for the Shonen Jump brand so they don't want it.Would fans of anime fighting games who don't play Smash welcome Nintendo characters and the floodgates it would open if the tables were turned? That's the real question.
I disagree. Being a fighter is definitely not the ONLY factor, but it absolutely can still influence a characters odds.I shouldn't need to correct you on this one but I must
A character being a fighter or not was never ever a factor
Your views on the topic are biasUhh.. Goku being the ambassador of the Olympics is my bias? Lol
So, you can insult people and you're objecdtivly right, and when I do it I'm trolling.Goku sucking: I'm not sure if you're just trolling me now lol. Dbz being good or bad is subjective. the transformers movies being bad is objective lol. Michael Bay needs to die, or stick to directing specific scenes, not entire movies. Dbz has always been popular, and it's made a comeback now.
Goku throws punches and shoots fireballs. That wasn't even original when he STARTED doing it and there are plenty of character in Smash that already do that sort of thing.Transformers was fun for kids in the 90s. Gokus moveset is the mostt iconic moveset of all time. Kamehameha, spirit bomb, kayoken, instant transmission, and supersajin? You realize everything after DB that would make you think Gokus moveset is generic was a ripoff of DB right? Optimis prime can transform and has a gun. That's pretty much it. What is iconic about that?
Again, all your saying is that other people's opinions are stupid and that yours isn't. It's not a good arguement.Shrek and britney spears: yes people ask for dumb crap. When a fat oger with no moveset, and a singer are being requested, you ignore them. When an iconic fighting character from Japan is requested, you at least entertain the idea.