But if you're going to accept homosexuality as permissable, why is it wrong for a person to lust over children if they would never harm them?Alright, alright, let's back up here.
Children aren't consenting adults. Age is a huge ****ing deal. Heterosexuals and Homosexuals can both be pedophiles. Not all heterosexuals and homosexuals are pedophiles. There's a large difference between being attracted to a certain age than a certain gender. Love between two consenting adults is perfectly healthy, love between a man and a kid is not.
I agree with you that a pedophile who never harms a child is in fact, not a bad person, but holy ****, how thick do you have to be to not see the difference between lusting after a child, and lusting after an adult?
This has absolutely nothing to do with natural order and gender, and everything to do with age, consent, and common sense-- a trait you seem to have a hard time grasping.
The argument for homosexuality is that it doesn't harm anyone against their will, it's not about what they're attracted to. The person in the above sentence isn't harming anyone .The same goes for a good-hearted person who dreams of ****** women. He wouldn't do it in real life so why is it wrong?
Both of these scenarios are examples of people attempting to attain sexual gratification outside of the procreation act, without infringing on the rights of any other person.
So how is this different from homsoexuality?