LoneKonWolf
Lazy Lonely Lurker☕
Nothing of particular use.
. . . . . . . . . . i. . . I think i just got an aneurysm.Oh, I am Wallace the Jailer.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Nothing of particular use.
. . . . . . . . . . i. . . I think i just got an aneurysm.Oh, I am Wallace the Jailer.
Oh that was not a sweet play.. . . . . . . . . . i. . . I think i just got an aneurysm.
How is it suspicious that Shish probing youI mentioned that because it's helluva suspicious that Shish wants to make me out to be shady when he himself is in the hotseat. Not only that but he had me pegged as potentially suspicious even before then.
Guy is clearly looking for an out.
How wouod that take suspicion off him when I'm voting for you, not him?You want to redirect suspicion when you yourself are in the hotseat. And in the event that Shadow was Mafia, it would take suspicion off him as well.
You're using your own play to frame him as guilty, this is his first game, how are you two related?I outlined my reasoning on why I think Shadow could very well be Mafia. Specifically referencing my play in Villains Mafia as evidence of that.
You've brought it up more than once thoughYou're attempting to use my link between you and Uni earlier on in the game as a means to incriminate me when I said myself that it wasn't a thought that held much weight. Just me theorizing early on in the game
You're using flavor as reasoning in a game where flavor doesn't matter.) I asked the Mafia question because in a game where the flavor suggests that one guy poisoned Dorcas, it's not completely unreasonable to think that Mafia could only be one person. Unlikely? Maybe but I don't think impossible.
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...........Hot take: hotseat warms my butt
I did not know my role was THAT important.Sigh....shiny why....
What’s done is done just protect someone and don’t tell anyone who it is.I did not know my role was THAT important.
This is a quick flip on this, is it his posting that really bothers you? I find it easy to see it as overreacting right now.Ehhh I think it would be better to just get a claim at this point, I actually. I don't think we're going to get much else out of this.
Vote: Shishce
Because he's been pointing fingers left and right to get out of a stick situation. And now he wants to use Shadow and a bunch of other straw graspy theories to incriminate me. Doesn't this seem suspicious to you?How is it suspicious that Shish probing you
When even you admit that he had you pegged as suspicious "even before" he was in the hotseat?
That clearly means that he's just suspicious of you. And not that he's looking for a way out.
1) Because it points Town towards me right after I voted for him. An easy scum play to make.How wouod that take suspicion off him when I'm voting for you, not him?
You're using your own play to frame him as guilty, this is his first game, how are you two related?
You've brought it up more than once though
You're using flavor as reasoning in a game where flavor doesn't matter.
Maybe this is really why I put pause on this.Not the only thing that makes me wary of him. But the fact that he went that far just to make me look like a scum is frankly dissapointing.
Lol stick situation. This is one typo i'll never live down lmao.Because he's been pointing fingers left and right to get out of a stick situation.
You're trying to make a scum plan on your head when there's none again, you guys think Mafia thinks of this game in a "I know you know I know you know" situation while theorising about complex plans when... it's not.Because it points Town towards me right after I voted for him. An easy scum play to make.
If you're looking for a reaction, maybe don't say it in public?) I said it sounded really oddly familiar to what I did. Inexperience doesn't mean much because I got a lot of guidance from more experience Mafia teammates as to what I should do and say. Hence I voted for him to see how he would react similar to what Holder did to me before.
You still believed it enough to mention it though.I did only because so many people asked me about it. At every instance, I made sure to clarify that it was just a theory that didn't have much weight behind it.
You claim to have made this assumption based on the OP yet you can't come to the conclusion flavor is worthless in this game when it tries to make that fact as explicit as possible?When was that stated? Now i'm just confused here
1) Says the guy who threw the fit about being voted for. Huh?You're trying to make a scum plan on your head when there's none again, you guys think Mafia thinks of this game in a "I know you know I know you know" situation while theorising about complex plans when... it's not.
Yet you now believe me to be scum simply because I voted for you and you created this whole thing in your head that proves it. It seems more like it's you who's getting all flustered over one vote.
If you're looking for a reaction, maybe don't say it in public?
You still believed it enough to mention it though.
You claim to have made this assumption based on the OP yet you can't come to the conclusion flavor is worthless in this game when it tries to make that fact as explicit as possible?
My vote stays.
He was coming off as being really abrasive (his phrasing, which included saying things like Uni was "ass-kissing" him, and that he "fails to understand" why I would ask a question (which could be an implication that he thinks I am dumb), while also not answering my question. Saying he doesn't care if he gets lynched, etc. is also ). Turns out it was just this really wild miscommunication based on the interpretation of the word "who"...This is a quick flip on this, is it his posting that really bothers you? I find it easy to see it as overreacting right now.
What are you talking about?1) Says the guy who threw the fit about being voted for. Huh?
What2) Literally how can I accomplish this in this Day Phase? PM's aren't allowed and even then in the theoretical event that Shadow was Mafia, it would give him a closed avenue to get info off me and share it with his buddies without anyone knowing that.
Fair enough3) To mention it yes but we're so early in the game that we have to say something about our observations. Which is why I wanted to stress the fact that Town shouldn't take what I said there to heart.
Yeah, sure4) Legit I had no idea of that. I asked the question because I was genuinely confused and had no idea
1) Literally all of yesterday.What are you talking about?
What
Fair enough
Yeah, sure
When did I ever double down on that? Bruh have you even been reading?It's interesting that Ura is doubling down on a theory that can't be true unless we're in some weird cult game. It seems like an out-of-the-blue comment that tries to come off as attempting to be useful for the Town with speculation as opposed to attempting to be misleading.
I think the biggest selling point for Ura being scum is that he suggested that Uni and Shish had potentially planned their argument in advance, then withdrew from his position when prodded about it.
I should also add that if I were scum, I wouldn't want to make any indications as to the size of Mafia's team. It would be completely asinine for any Mafia member to get Town to speculate how many of them their could be.Clarification: Ura is a big null for me because I don't know if he would, as scum, try to pass off a statement like "there might be a 1-man mafia team" when something like that just isn't true unless we're in a cult game of sorts. Basically, as scum, he would be knowingly providing fraudulent information based on flavor to come off as speculating for the good of Town while actively attempting to mislead them.
Whereas the Town side of things is that he is just incorrect about the possibility of there being a single man mafia team and doesn't understand mafia game balance, but was trying to be helpful through speculation.
Is Mafia a one-man force in this game?
I mean traditionally it's usually 3-4 people but the flavor implies it was one guy that poisoned Dorcas.
I realize that I need to be less ambiguous when I make my posts to ensure optimal communication, lol.4) I asked the Mafia question because in a game where the flavor suggests that one guy poisoned Dorcas, it's not completely unreasonable to think that Mafia could only be one person. Unlikely? Maybe but I don't think impossible.
I was saying all that because I was confused dude. A suggestion that I thought could hold some weight until Shish pointed out the flavor had no barring on the amount of Mafia members.Ura this is what I was referring to when I said you were doubling down:
I realize that I need to be less ambiguous when I make my posts to ensure optimal communication, lol.
I questioned "why you said you were looking for a reaction" in public. Telling everyone you want a reaction kills the point of fishing for one.You're questioning why I wanted to get info out of Shadow in public when I told you I wanted to do what Holder did to me the last game. I also brought up the fact that Shadow could potentially get rid of me in the Night phase through a private PM.
You keep trying to push me and that's not making your case any better. Why don't you try to defend yourself before trying to incriminate me? And I have no reason to believe you're telling the truth on you being confused when that's what finally tipped me over that you were acting suspicious.Honestly if this is your lousy attempt at trying to incriminate me then buddy you need to try harder. Even when I went out of my way to explain why I was confused.
It's 3, this is a 13-person game. 2 is too little, 4 is too much. What else would it be?I should also add that if I were scum, I wouldn't want to make any indications as to the size of Mafia's team. It would be completely asinine for any Mafia member to get Town to speculate how many of them their could be.
1) You questioned me so I had to give out my though process on it. Otherwise i'd look like an idiot saying nothing when people are asking me about why I voted for Shadow.I questioned "why you said you were looking for a reaction" in public. Telling everyone you want a reaction kills the point of fishing for one.
You keep trying to push me and that's not making your case any better. Why don't you try to defend yourself before trying to incriminate me? And I have no reason to believe you're telling the truth on you being confused when that's what finally tipped me over that you were acting suspicious.
It's 3, this is a 13-person game. 2 is too little, 4 is too much. What else would it be?
So that vote is now pointless1) You questioned me so I had to give out my though process on it. Otherwise i'd look like an idiot saying nothing when people are asking me about why I voted for Shadow.
2) Except that I literally wasn't trying to incriminate you with that post. Please re-read it. You were the one doing that to me by saying "yeah sure" as if to paint me as a liar. And ironically enough you're still trying to press me and paint me as suspicions. Huh?
3) As I said, it was a thought that crossed my mind until it was clarified that the flavor had no barring. Why do you keep going back to his point?
No it's not. I still have a suspicion of him being Mafia based on the comparison I made before. I feel like i'm going circles here.So that vote is now pointless
"If this is your lousy attempt to incriminate me" how is that not trying to incriminate me? You're implying I'm trying to mislynch.
Because your clarification is meaningless to me. I saw three things stack up and the last one is the most suspicious of them all, I'm not gonna discard it so easily just because you, the suspect, told me to.
Don't tempt fate Shiny lol.I WILL LIVE!
MAFIA, YOU CAN NOT GET ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
...
Okay I will probably be killed by the mafia anyway.
Vote: ShadowTheHedgehogZVote: ShadowTheHedgehogZ
Don’t feel good with a Shish lynch gut feel of town that got in over their head. The abrasive ness doesn’t look like scum motivation.
What made you turn to Shadow from Ura/Opossum?Vote: ShadowTheHedgehogZ
Don’t feel good with a Shish lynch gut feel of town that got in over their head. The abrasive ness doesn’t look like scum motivation.
Haven’t Reread them yet, at work atm, want to push this since that slot is either lurking or doing nothing.What made you turn to Shadow from Ura/Opossum?
I agree about the Shish point.
Unvote
I think at least one out of Ura/Shish might be Mafia. Then again, we had a Pent claim to go along with Clarisse. Shadow's silence makes me want to vote for them, but I'll hold off for now.It's interesting that Ura is doubling down on a theory that can't be true unless we're in some weird cult game. It seems like an out-of-the-blue comment that tries to come off as attempting to be useful for the Town with speculation as opposed to attempting to be misleading.
I think the biggest selling point for Ura being scum is that he suggested that Uni and Shish had potentially planned their argument in advance, then withdrew from his position when prodded about it.
He was coming off as being really abrasive (his phrasing, which included saying things like Uni was "***-kissing" him, and that he "fails to understand" why I would ask a question (which could be an implication that he thinks I am dumb), while also not answering my question. Saying he doesn't care if he gets lynched, etc. is also ). Turns out it was just this really wild miscommunication based on the interpretation of the word "who"...
Opossum there's been a lot of content. Who do you think are the bad baddies?
What's up with you confusing other characters with Clarisse?Clarisse
Deep down I'm still salty the role died on day one.What's up with you confusing other characters with Clarisse?
Hey, don't compare best girl Louise to Tsundere With A BowDeep down I'm still salty the role died on day one.
Clarisse, Louise, same thing.