Fate/Mafia --- ENDGAME: Town Victory: The Dragon Slayer's Judgement

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

So, 3 votes for Z so far.

Only 5 more, then everyone else vote No Lynch.

 

[Coricus]

OK, but what happens if somebody votes something other than No Lynch or Z25?

 

[Jojalole]

*The Reinhardt is on the opening*
10/10 game

Actually it's tripple.

I know this, because I'm the mayor.

Also we have a mayor, a step up from the last town and game

Wut triple vote? Guess Shish had fun with the roles. So, if we tie in votes we'll confirm that his vote is more valuable, but should we also try proving his triple vote? It might be risky.

Either way...
Vote: Z25

 

[Pokechu]

Would it even be a tie with No Lynch? I think in Opossum's game if it was a tie between No Lynch and a player then the player would still get killed.

But IDK I could be wrong.

 

[Z25]

Perfect! Now we can prove it. If we make sure two fewer people vote for No Lynch than the target, and you vote No Lynch with the remainder, you should live through today and have your role proven.

Unvote: No Lynch
Vote: Z25

I say we use the supposed mayor to test this. That way if they lied, we lynched a liar.
But if you ARE mayor, no one will be lynched,

I love it when Day One gets stuff done.

So what side should I vote for? No lunch?

Because this way, the worst case scenario is that someone dies after PRETENDING to be mayor. Lynch All Liars. If he's actually mayor, let him prove it. No risk involved. If someone sabotages it, we lynch them next.

Simple.

i hope that doesn’t happen, the town would have quite some trouble proving that and the mayor would be gone.

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

OK, but what happens if somebody votes something other than No Lynch or Z25?

It throws the whole system off, but at the same time, if we take into account that someone, we can still approximate whether Z's claim was right or wrong.

It's just easier to determine if everyone participates.

 

[Deleted member]

Ties result in a 30-minute Tiebreaker phase immediately after Day phase ends. Players who did not vote for the tied players may cast their vote during this. Another tie results in both users getting lynched.

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

...

You're a monster, Gudako...

 

[praline]

God damn it Shish.

 

[Pokechu]

@Shishœ
What if it was like 3 votes for Z25 and 3 for No Lynch? I think in either Swamp's or Opossum's game it wouldn't have been a tie (the person would still get killed) but idk

 

[Pokechu]

especially if the whole town gets involved, since normally both would get lynched. how would a z25/no lynch tie work?

 

[Jojalole]

Would it even be a tie with No Lynch? I think in Opossum's game if it was a tie between No Lynch and a player then the player would still get killed.

But IDK I could be wrong.

We had tie breaker on Opo's game, same as this one. With a tie, we prove that he has more value on his vote, and it's less risky than having more votes on someone.

So what side should I vote for? No lunch?

I think yeah, that's who you should vote. We first need some votes on you though, there's lot of people left.

Also, I just realized, the title is a crit quote from Reinhardt. You outdid yourself Shish, hahaha.

 

[Opossum]

We should have two less people voting No Lynch than Z25. That way Z's three votes makes No Lynch win by one.

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

No lunch?

NEVER SKIP A MEAL, Z!

 

[Pokechu]

Jojalole It's possible for there to be tiebreakers, but since there's been different policies on no lynch being in them that's why I'm asking. Since we'd all be looking pretty stupid if it turns out that a tie (including a tiebreaker phase) with no lynch and Z25 would still get Z25 lynched.

 

[Jojalole]

Jojalole It's possible for there to be tiebreakers, but since there's been different policies on no lynch being in them that's why I'm asking. Since we'd all be looking pretty stupid if it turns out that a tie (including a tiebreaker phase) with no lynch and Z25 would still get Z25 lynched.

If there's a tie then on the tie breaker we save his butt, but it would mean that he's lying. Either way, done correctly, we can prove his role without the need of a tie breaker (We did this on the FEH mafia).

So yeah, we need for example, 7 votes on Z25 and 5 votes on NoLynch, one of them being from Z25. If he has triple vote, NoLynch wins and no one gets killed. Easy a that.

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

If there's a tie then on the tie breaker we save his butt, but it would mean that he's lying. Either way, done correctly, we can prove his role without the need of a tie breaker (We did this on the FEH mafia).

So yeah, we need for example, 7 votes on Z25 and 5 votes on NoLynch, one of them being from Z25. If he has triple vote, NoLynch wins and no one gets killed. Easy a that.

Huh. That works out well.

But we'd need someone who votes for someone else, to ensure this strategy works out perfectly.

 

[Pokechu]

math is surprisingly hard for me im dumb lol

Your strategy would work pretty well Jojalole but I was questioning if everyone voted, what'd the result be. If we have 14 people, and one can triplevote, then that's 16 votes. If eight vote for Z25 and the remaining six votes for No Lynch, and that group of 6 includes Z25, then Z25 and No Lynch would be tied. Since that's the whole town and there couldn't be any more votes, there couldn't be a tiebreaker. So would the result of that be Z25 being lynched, or would there just be no lynch for the day?

 

[Jojalole]

Huh. That works out well.

But we'd need someone who votes for someone else, to ensure this strategy works out perfectly.

Or not voting at all... It's not compulsory to vote (at least I think it isn't), so if we have the right set up people don't need to vote. If it's obligatory to vote, then yeah, the rest should vote at random.

Also it's like 4AM, I don't know why I'm even here hahahaha. I'll keep talking later.

 

[Deleted member]

So what side should I vote for? No lunch?

YOU MONSTER!

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

Or not voting at all... It's not compulsory to vote (at least I think it isn't), so if we have the right set up people don't need to vote. If it's obligatory to vote, then yeah, the rest should vote at random.

I just re-read the rules and it's not specified. However...

Host may have forgotten an important rule because they're dumb dumb, if so, please notify me.

We should make sure that's the case.

 

[Deleted member]

If a player and No Lynch get tied, the result will be the same as a player/player tie meaning the tied player will still be lynched.
Voting is not mandatory, there's no punishment for not voting.

 

[Deleted member]

I am not the mayor, just letting you all know.
Vote: No Lynch

 

[Deleted member]

I love how everyone's so eager to do the same exact thing that a Mafioso lead them to do before.

 

[Opossum]

I love how everyone's so eager to do the same exact thing that a Mafioso lead them to do before.

A good plan that is used by an evil person doesn't stop the plan from being good.

 

[Swamp Sensei]

A good plan that is used by an evil person doesn't stop the plan from being good.

A good plan that is used by an evil person

used by an evil person

evil person

 

[Deleted member]

*takes imaginary cupcake off imaginary tray and hands it to Shiny*

Thank you!
*Chews very slowly until it is a liquid-like material and swallows the cake*

This is confirming something!

YOU MONSTER!

I got your back.
*calls pizza company*
What toppings do you want on your pizza?

 

[Deleted member]

A good plan that is used by an evil person doesn't stop the plan from being good.

A new rule after this game should be that whoever initiates the plan makes themselves the bait.

If it's such a good plan, they have nothing to fear, right?

 

[Deleted member]

I got your back.
*calls pizza company*
What toppings do you want on your pizza?

Pepperoni, sausage, mushroom, jalapeno.

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

I love how everyone's so eager to do the same exact thing that a Mafioso lead them to do before.

Opo also did that last game, and he was the cop.

 

[Deleted member]

Opo also did that last game, and he was the cop.

A rather blood-thirsty cop, I might add.

 

[Deleted member]

Opo also did that last game, and he was the cop.

In his defense, he was too depressed to care what the game was about.

Pepperoni, sausage, mushroom, jalapeno.

Got it.
*Calls pizza guy what you want, pays credit and tax*
Hot pizza coming soon, Golden.

 

[Jojalole]

A new rule after this game should be that whoever initiates the plan makes themselves the bait.

If it's such a good plan, they have nothing to fear, right?

Reminder that Swamp made himself the bait on the FEH even though he was a mafioso? This plan it's just helpful, and makes the mayor able to prove his role, thing that would be difficult otherwise.

 

[Deleted member]

Reminder that Swamp made himself the bait on the FEH even though he was a mafioso? This plan it's just helpful, and makes the mayor able to prove his role, thing that would be difficult otherwise.

Swamp ended up being the bait by coincidence.
He didn't willingly step up to do so.

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

A rather blood-thirsty cop, I might add.

But a cop nonetheless.

 

[Deleted member]

But a cop nonetheless.

Following in the footsteps of a Mafioso.

 

[The Stoopid Unikorn]

Following in the footsteps of a Mafioso.

I'm not following anyone's footsteps. Simply stating a fact.

 

[Deleted member]

Following in the footsteps of a Mafioso.

You think that? Opossum was not trying to be bad or anything.
Here is your hot pizza!

Eat up man.

 

[Deleted member]

I'm not following anyone's footsteps. Simply stating a fact.

....I was saying that he was following in the footsteps of a Mafioso.

 

[Deleted member]

You think that? Opossum was not trying to be bad or anything.
Here is your hot pizza!

Eat up man.

OLIVES?!

.....I'll let this slide for now.
-eats-