WhiteDragon
Smash Cadet
You're still misusing it. "Example of how ignorant people are to an alternate suggestion." - How can be showing a lack of knowledge to an alternate suggestion? By not knowing what the heck you're talking about because you're being illogical?
"Someone else said something and people rejected their ideas. They were proven right, as such, I'm probably right as well!"
Yeah, nice try. Come up with valid arguments instead.
And also, pot - kettle, much? Who's being ignorant here, bub? Who's ignoring already established facts about Tripping in favour of their illogical theory? Who here's refusing to accept that certain things have already been proven about tripping simply because it goes against their theory?
Or maybe you just don't know enough about tripping.
Say what?
Anyway, it's not alternate suggestions in general that aren't accept. It's stupidity. We've already said this (me, others), we don't care that you're a newly registered user. We don't care that what you suggest is new. We care that your suggestion is illogical and has already been proven to be false, yet you insist it isn't using nothing but "Because I say so" and Strawman's arguments and whatnot.
You act as if you're right because someone else somewhere was proven right once.
No I'm not. Still misusing the word.
All of which are illogical and based on bupkis.
Tripping is something based on opinion now? As opposed to based on fact? Wow, my opinion is that Fox's Shine doesn't spike. Must mean I'm right.
We're flaming you for being wrong and refusing to see reason despite mounds of evidence on the contrary of what you're saying.
Also, you still have not answered a question I've had to ask, what, thrice now! Have you ever seen this fabled animation where both of a characters' feet are off the ground?! Have you?!
All of your "arguments" insofar have been refuted. I don't understand why you can't see that. You make a lot of baseless assumptions based on nothing but your own opinion what you believe to be true. That's OK. We present you with evidence on why you're wrong. You ignore them and tell us we're being ignorant/insulting/bla. bla. bla. That's not OK.
Just because you're wrong and we're pointing out why you're wrong does not mean we're being ignorant, insulting your intelligence or even flaming. I have yet to outright flame you in this thread, mind you.
Just to clear things up, what is your current theory on why tripping occurs (because it seems to fluctuate a lot. Each time new evidence is presented (evidence you should be aware of had you not been so ignorant on what's already been established about tripping), your "theory" on why tripping occurs changes drastically. Whenever something you claim is proven spectacularly wrong, instead of admitting defeat, you ignore it as if you'd never said it in the first place and formulate new (and illogical) theorems.
Here's a question, Mr. Pot:
Who's the one being "ignorant" to alternate suggestions here?
You have a theory (which changes with every other post you write). We present you with evidence on why Tripping is Random. Instead of admitting that our evidence is sound (which it is), you resolutely state "No, tripping can in no way be random!" and refuse to accept even the possibility of it being random.
You're dead serious on that you're the only one who's right and that anyone who says tripping is random is wrong despite the fact that we have proof and clinical tests proving our point whilst you have nothing.
Some people just aren't worth it after a while