With Laundry kind of being on the hot seat and him being a likely candidate for the pool tomorrow (plus we're getting close to deadline and anything can happen ex: with this Nabe vote), my thoughts on him
I get that he's "controlling" the town, but generally scum attempts at controlling the town involve strong-manning things and limiting discussion in specific spots instead of trying to get everyone involved. While I think you can "fake" this, I don't think it's beneficial to do so. The only time I recall Laundry actually limiting discussion was saying that we couldn't lynch Z, which made sense because we were right next to deadline and the vote count gave us two options. Outside of that, Laundry's focus has been on getting everyone else into the game and getting them involved, and he hasn't been biased in this, either. He also has been contributing a LOT with his own reads while doing so, being pretty transparent even. I just can't see scum intent in Laundry's play.
If we're going to go down the controlling town route and get a scummy vibe from it, I'd much rather look at Ryker than Laundry. Ryker's controlling of the town has been way more closed than Laundry's, and when it comes to deadlines, he's way more forceful in limiting the pool and isolating discussions (even if it's imo justified to get people to think outside of the box ex: Kantrip). I don't like this route personally, and I'm not going to go down it, but if we're going to go down this route, I'd rather see it on Ryker than Laundry.
I've seen the posts viewing Laundry as suspect, and I'm really not buying it. Wasn't a fan of Soup's reasoning, Z's case was straight up horrible, and most other people are just in the "too good to be true slight doubt" type of pool which isn't anywhere near enough to make a case.